Literature DB >> 32361849

Value of CXCL8-CXCR1/2 axis in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer patients: a retrospective pilot study.

Ruo-Xi Wang1,2, Peng Ji1,2, Yue Gong1,2, Zhi-Ming Shao1,2,3, Sheng Chen4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study we investigate the prediction and prognostic value of CXCL8-CXCR1/2 axis for Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) following standard radical surgery.
METHODS: A total of 303 TNBC patients were included in this study. The NAC regimen was weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) for all patients. Serum CXCL8 level was measured at baseline and at surgery via Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Immunohistochemistry was used to detect CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression in patients with residual tumors after NAC. Correlations between variables and treatment response were studied, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was implemented for prognostic evaluation.
RESULTS: Of the 303 patients, 103 (34.0%) patients experienced pathological complete response (pCR) after completion of NAC. CXCL8 level was significantly upgraded after NAC in CXCR1/2+ patients and downgraded after NAC in CXCR1/2- patients. Higher pCR rate was more likely observed in patients with lower CXCL8 level at surgery (P = 0.004, HR 0.939, 95% CI 0.900-0.980). In the multivariate survival model, CXCR1/2 expression was of an independent prognostic value for survival (CXCR1/2+, HR 2.149, 95% CI 0.933-4.949; CXCR1/2++, HR 3.466, 95% CI 1.569-7.655, CXCR1/2- was used as a reference; P = 0.003). Patients with higher level of CXCR1/2 expression were more likely to suffer unfavorable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the clarification of the value of serum CXCL8 level to predict pCR for TNBC patients, and prognostic performance of CXCR1/2 in non-pCR responders after NAC. The CXCL8-CXCR1/2 might play an important role in tailoring and modifying the NAC strategy for advanced TNBCs; however, further confirmatory studies are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; CXCR1; CXCR2; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathological complete response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32361849     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05660-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  3 in total

1.  Prognostic value of using glucosylceramide synthase and cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A1 expression levels for patients with triple-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jiannan Liu; Shuhua Wang; Congcong Wang; Xiangshuo Kong; Ping Sun
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers and Emerging Therapies for Chemotherapy Resistant TNBC.

Authors:  Paola Ferrari; Cristian Scatena; Matteo Ghilli; Irene Bargagna; Giulia Lorenzini; Andrea Nicolini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  The AGEs/RAGE Transduction Signaling Prompts IL-8/CXCR1/2-Mediated Interaction between Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) and Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Maria Francesca Santolla; Marianna Talia; Francesca Cirillo; Domenica Scordamaglia; Salvatore De Rosis; Asia Spinelli; Anna Maria Miglietta; Bruno Nardo; Gianfranco Filippelli; Ernestina Marianna De Francesco; Antonino Belfiore; Rosamaria Lappano; Marcello Maggiolini
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 7.666

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.