Literature DB >> 32361650

The evolutionary psychology of mass mobilization: how disinformation and demagogues coordinate rather than manipulate.

Michael Bang Petersen1.   

Abstract

Large-scale mobilization is often accompanied by the emergence of demagogic leaders and the circulation of unverified rumors, especially if the mobilization happens in support of violent or disruptive projects. In those circumstances, researchers and commentators frequently explain the mobilization as a result of mass manipulation. Against this view, evolutionary psychologists have provided evidence that human psychology contains mechanisms for avoiding manipulation and new studies suggest that political manipulation attempts are, in general, ineffective. Instead, we can understand decisions to follow demagogic leaders and circulate fringe rumors as attempts to solve a social problem inherent to mobilization processes: The coordination problem. Essentially, these decisions reflect attempts to align the attention of individuals already disposed for conflict.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32361650     DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol        ISSN: 2352-250X


  1 in total

1.  Do conspiracy theories efficiently signal coalition membership? An experimental test using the "Who Said What?" design.

Authors:  Mathilde Mus; Alexander Bor; Michael Bang Petersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.