Literature DB >> 32361086

Miniaturized implantable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector (BIOMONITOR III): Insertion procedure assessment, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success.

Justin A Mariani1, Rukshen Weerasooriya2, Olivier van den Brink3, Uwais Mohamed4, Paul A Gould5, Rajeev K Pathak6, Tina Lin7, Andre Conradie8, Peter Illes9, Stephen Pavia10, Kushwin Rajamani11, Sam Lovibond12, Ian Matthews13, David DiFiore14, Deepak Arumugam15, Jürgen Schrader16, Dennis H Lau17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implantable Cardiac Monitors (ICMs) are used for long-term monitoring of arrhythmias. BIOMONITOR III is a novel ICM with a miniaturized profile, long sensing vector due to a flexible antenna, simplified implantation with a dedicated insertion tool for pocket formation and ICM placement in a single step, and daily automatic Home Monitoring (HM) function.
METHODS: In 47 patients undergoing BIOMONITOR III insertion for any ICM indication, 16 investigators at 10 Australian sites assessed handling characteristics of the insertion tool, R-wave amplitudes, noise burden, P-wave visibility, and HM transmission success. Patients were followed for 1 month.
RESULTS: All 47 attempted insertions were successful. Median time from skin incision to removal of the insertion tool after ICM insertion was 39 s (IQR 19-65) and to wound closure and cleaning was 4.7 min (IQR 3.5-7.8). All aspects of the insertion tool were rated as "good" or "excellent" in ≥97.9% and "fair" in ≤2.1% of patients, except for "force needed for tunnelling" (91.5% good/excellent, 8.5% fair). Based on HM data, R-waves in the first month were stable at 0.70 ± 0.37 mV. Median noise burden (disabling automatic rhythm evaluation) was 0.19% (IQR 0.00-0.93), equivalent to 2.7 min (IQR 0.0-13.4) per day. In HM-transmitted ECG strips with regular sinus rhythm, P-waves were visible in 89 ± 24% of heart cycles. Patient-individual automatic Home Monitoring transmission success was 98.0% ± 5.5%.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel ICM performed well in all aspects studied, including fast insertion, reliable R-wave sensing, good P-wave visibility, and highly successful HM transmissions.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrhythmia; Implantable cardiac monitor; Implantable loop recorder; Remote monitoring; Syncope

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32361086     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  6 in total

1.  Programming Optimization in Implantable Cardiac Monitors to Reduce False-Positive Arrhythmia Alerts: A Call for Research.

Authors:  Fabrizio Guarracini; Martina Testolina; Daniele Giacopelli; Marta Martin; Francesco Triglione; Alessio Coser; Silvia Quintarelli; Roberto Bonmassari; Massimiliano Marini
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15

2.  Factors affecting signal quality in implantable cardiac monitors with long sensing vector.

Authors:  Giovanni B Forleo; Claudia Amellone; Riccardo Sacchi; Leonida Lombardi; Maria Teresa Lucciola; Valentina Scotti; Maurizio Viecca; Marco Schiavone; Daniele Giacopelli; Massimo Giammaria
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-06-21

3.  New-generation miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Insertion procedure, sensing performance, and home monitoring transmission success in a real-world population.

Authors:  Thomas Deneke; Pilar Cabanas; Daniel Hofer; Thomas Gaspar; Bertrand Pierre; Giovanni Bisignani; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Victor Manuel Sanfins; Eimo Martens; Jacques Mansourati; Antonio Berruezo-Sanchez; Marcus Wiemer; Andreas Hain; Thomas Pezawas; Beate Wenzel; Dennis Lau
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-01-30

4.  Utility of a novel wearable electrode embedded in an undershirt for electrocardiogram monitoring and detection of arrhythmias.

Authors:  Kazuaki Amami; Akiomi Yoshihisa; Yuko Horikoshi; Shinya Yamada; Takeshi Nehashi; Naoko Hijioka; Minoru Nodera; Takashi Kaneshiro; Tetsuro Yokokawa; Tomofumi Misaka; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Revisiting where to apply preimplant mapping to improve P-wave sensing of insertable cardiac monitors.

Authors:  Yuhei Kasai; Jungo Kasai; Syuichi Sahashi; Sandeep Shakya; Hiroki Kuji; Naoki Hayakawa; Kotaro Miyaji; Junji Kanda
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-05-27

6.  The BIOMONITOR III Injectable Cardiac Monitor: Clinical Experience with a Novel Injectable Cardiac Monitor.

Authors:  Nico Reinsch; Anna Füting; Dennis Höwel; Kars Neven
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.