Joshua Lukemire1, Yikai Wang1, Amit Verma1, Ying Guo2. 1. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: yguo2@emory.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Independent component analysis (ICA) is a popular tool for investigating brain organization in neuroscience research. In fMRI studies, an important goal is to study how brain networks are modulated by subjects' clinical and demographic variables. Existing ICA methods and toolboxes don't incorporate subjects' covariates effects in ICA estimation of brain networks, which potentially leads to loss in accuracy and statistical power in detecting brain network differences between subjects' groups. NEW METHOD: We introduce a Matlab toolbox, HINT (Hierarchical INdependent component analysis Toolbox), that provides a hierarchical covariate-adjusted ICA (hc-ICA) for modeling and testing covariate effects and generates model-based estimates of brain networks on both the population- and individual-level. HINT provides a user-friendly Matlab GUI that allows users to easily load images, specify covariate effects, monitor model estimation via an EM algorithm, specify hypothesis tests, and visualize results. HINT also has a command line interface which allows users to conveniently run and reproduce the analysis with a script. COMPARISON TO EXISTING METHODS: HINT implements a new multi-level probabilistic ICA model for group ICA. It provides a statistically principled ICA modeling framework for investigating covariate effects on brain networks. HINT can also generate and visualize model-based network estimates for user-specified subject groups, which greatly facilitates group comparisons. RESULTS: We demonstrate the steps and functionality of HINT with an fMRI example data to estimate treatment effects on brain networks while controlling for other covariates. Results demonstrate estimated brain networks and model-based comparisons between the treatment and control groups. In comparisons using synthetic fMRI data, HINT shows desirable statistical power in detecting group differences in networks especially in small sample sizes, while maintaining a low false positive rate. HINT also demonstrates similar or increased accuracy in reconstructing both population- and individual-level source signal maps as compared to some state-of-the-art group ICA methods. CONCLUSION: HINT can provide a useful tool for both statistical and neuroscience researchers to evaluate and test differences in brain networks between subject groups.
BACKGROUND: Independent component analysis (ICA) is a popular tool for investigating brain organization in neuroscience research. In fMRI studies, an important goal is to study how brain networks are modulated by subjects' clinical and demographic variables. Existing ICA methods and toolboxes don't incorporate subjects' covariates effects in ICA estimation of brain networks, which potentially leads to loss in accuracy and statistical power in detecting brain network differences between subjects' groups. NEW METHOD: We introduce a Matlab toolbox, HINT (Hierarchical INdependent component analysis Toolbox), that provides a hierarchical covariate-adjusted ICA (hc-ICA) for modeling and testing covariate effects and generates model-based estimates of brain networks on both the population- and individual-level. HINT provides a user-friendly Matlab GUI that allows users to easily load images, specify covariate effects, monitor model estimation via an EM algorithm, specify hypothesis tests, and visualize results. HINT also has a command line interface which allows users to conveniently run and reproduce the analysis with a script. COMPARISON TO EXISTING METHODS: HINT implements a new multi-level probabilistic ICA model for group ICA. It provides a statistically principled ICA modeling framework for investigating covariate effects on brain networks. HINT can also generate and visualize model-based network estimates for user-specified subject groups, which greatly facilitates group comparisons. RESULTS: We demonstrate the steps and functionality of HINT with an fMRI example data to estimate treatment effects on brain networks while controlling for other covariates. Results demonstrate estimated brain networks and model-based comparisons between the treatment and control groups. In comparisons using synthetic fMRI data, HINT shows desirable statistical power in detecting group differences in networks especially in small sample sizes, while maintaining a low false positive rate. HINT also demonstrates similar or increased accuracy in reconstructing both population- and individual-level source signal maps as compared to some state-of-the-art group ICA methods. CONCLUSION: HINT can provide a useful tool for both statistical and neuroscience researchers to evaluate and test differences in brain networks between subject groups.
Authors: Christian F Beckmann; Marilena DeLuca; Joseph T Devlin; Stephen M Smith Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2005-05-29 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Peter T Fox; Karla L Miller; David C Glahn; P Mickle Fox; Clare E Mackay; Nicola Filippini; Kate E Watkins; Roberto Toro; Angela R Laird; Christian F Beckmann Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bharat B Biswal; Maarten Mennes; Xi-Nian Zuo; Suril Gohel; Clare Kelly; Steve M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jonathan S Adelstein; Randy L Buckner; Stan Colcombe; Anne-Marie Dogonowski; Monique Ernst; Damien Fair; Michelle Hampson; Matthew J Hoptman; James S Hyde; Vesa J Kiviniemi; Rolf Kötter; Shi-Jiang Li; Ching-Po Lin; Mark J Lowe; Clare Mackay; David J Madden; Kristoffer H Madsen; Daniel S Margulies; Helen S Mayberg; Katie McMahon; Christopher S Monk; Stewart H Mostofsky; Bonnie J Nagel; James J Pekar; Scott J Peltier; Steven E Petersen; Valentin Riedl; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bart Rypma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Sein Schmidt; Rachael D Seidler; Greg J Siegle; Christian Sorg; Gao-Jun Teng; Juha Veijola; Arno Villringer; Martin Walter; Lihong Wang; Xu-Chu Weng; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Peter Williamson; Christian Windischberger; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong-Ying Zhang; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Erik Barry Erhardt; Srinivas Rachakonda; Edward J Bedrick; Elena A Allen; Tülay Adali; Vince D Calhoun Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jesper Andersson; Edward J Auerbach; Janine Bijsterbosch; Gwenaëlle Douaud; Eugene Duff; David A Feinberg; Ludovica Griffanti; Michael P Harms; Michael Kelly; Timothy Laumann; Karla L Miller; Steen Moeller; Steve Petersen; Jonathan Power; Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi; Abraham Z Snyder; An T Vu; Mark W Woolrich; Junqian Xu; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Uğurbil; David C Van Essen; Matthew F Glasser Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 6.556