Literature DB >> 32360730

Repeating or spacing learning sessions are strategies for memory improvement with shared molecular and neuronal components.

Verónica Cattaneo1, Alvaro San Martin1, Sergio E Lew2, Bruce D Gelb3, Mario R Pagani4.   

Abstract

Intellectual disability is a common feature in genetic disorders with enhanced RAS-ERK1/2 signaling, including neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and Noonan syndrome (NS). Additional training trials and additional spacing between trials, respectively, restores memory deficits in animal models of NF1 and NS. However, the relationship between the underlying mechanisms in these strategies remain obscure. Here, we developed an approach to examine the effect of adding training trials or spacing to a weak training protocol and used genetic and behavioral manipulations in Drosophila to explore such question. We found that repetition and spacing effects are highly related, being equally effective to improve memory in control flies and sharing mechanistic bases, including the requirement of RAS activity in mushroom body neurons and protein synthesis dependence. After spacing or repeating learning trials, memory improvement depends on the formation of long-term memory (LTM). Moreover, a disease-related gain-of-function RasV152G allele impaired LTM. Using minimal training protocols, we established that both learning strategies were also equally effective for memory rescue in the RasV152G mutant and showed non-additive interaction of the spacing and repetition effects. Memory improvement was never detected after Ras inhibition. We conclude that memory improvement by spacing or repeating training trials are two ways of using the same molecular resources, including RAS-ERK1/2-dependent signaling. This evidence supports the concept that learning problems in RAS-related disorders depend on the impaired ability to exploit the repetition and the spacing effect required for long-term memory induction.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; Memory improvement strategies; Memory rescue; RASopathies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32360730      PMCID: PMC7451235          DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  43 in total

1.  Inducible, pharmacogenetic approaches to the study of learning and memory.

Authors:  M Ohno; P W Frankland; A P Chen; R M Costa; A J Silva
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin reverses the learning and attention deficits in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Weidong Li; Yijun Cui; Steven A Kushner; Robert A M Brown; J David Jentsch; Paul W Frankland; Tyrone D Cannon; Alcino J Silva
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Memory phases in Drosophila.

Authors:  W G Quinn; Y Dudai
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Spaced training rescues memory and ERK1/2 signaling in fragile X syndrome model mice.

Authors:  Ronald R Seese; Kathleen Wang; Yue Qin Yao; Gary Lynch; Christine M Gall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Noonan syndrome and related disorders: genetics and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Marco Tartaglia; Bruce D Gelb
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  Long-distance integration of nuclear ERK signaling triggered by activation of a few dendritic spines.

Authors:  Shenyu Zhai; Eugene D Ark; Paula Parra-Bueno; Ryohei Yasuda
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The phosphatase SHP2 regulates the spacing effect for long-term memory induction.

Authors:  Mario R Pagani; Kimihiko Oishi; Bruce D Gelb; Yi Zhong
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Tully; W G Quinn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 9.  Growth factor signaling and memory formation: temporal and spatial integration of a molecular network.

Authors:  Ashley M Kopec; Thomas J Carew
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Effects of spaced retrieval training with errorless learning in the rehabilitation of patients with dementia.

Authors:  Jong Sik Jang; Jae Shin Lee; Doo Han Yoo
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30
View more
  2 in total

1.  Precise timing of ERK phosphorylation/dephosphorylation determines the outcome of trial repetition during long-term memory formation.

Authors:  Nikolay V Kukushkin; Tasnim Tabassum; Thomas J Carew
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Recognition Memory in Noonan Syndrome.

Authors:  Floriana Costanzo; Paolo Alfieri; Cristina Caciolo; Paola Bergonzini; Francesca Perrino; Giuseppe Zampino; Chiara Leoni; Deny Menghini; Maria Cristina Digilio; Marco Tartaglia; Stefano Vicari; Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.