Sophia Braund1, Clotilde Hennetier1, Clemence Klapczynski1, Antoine Scattarelli1, Julien Coget2, Valérie Bridoux2, Jean Jacques Tuech2, Horace Roman3. 1. Expert Center in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis (Drs. Braund, Hennetier, Klapczynski, and Scattarelli). 2. Department of Surgery (Drs. Coget, Bridoux, and Tuech), Rouen University Hospital, Rouen. 3. Endometriosis Center, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux (Dr. Roman), France; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark (Dr. Roman).. Electronic address: horace.roman@gmail.com.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence, risk factors, and management of bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid using either disk excision (DE) or segmental resection (SR). DESIGN: Retrospective study using data from consecutive cases recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis database. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Four hundred thirty-one consecutive patients managed for rectosigmoid endometriosis were enrolled in our study. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic SR or DE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients underwent DE, and 266 patients underwent SR. Large nodules ≥3 cm in diameter were more frequent in the SR group (73.3% vs 66.1%), whereas nodules infiltrating the low rectum were 3 times more frequent in the DE group (35.9% vs 11.3%). The frequency of vaginal excision (67.9% vs 62%) and stoma (46.7% vs 44.4%) were comparable between the DE and SR groups. Twenty-three patients presented with postoperative colorectal stenosis after SR (8.6%) versus none after DE (p <.001). Treatment of colorectal stenosis involved dilatation in 20 (87%) cases and SR in 4 (17.4%) cases. For 1 patient, dilatation resulted in rectosigmoid injury requiring SR, followed by rectovaginal fistula. The logistic regression model identified a diverting stoma as the sole risk factor independently related to the risk of postoperative stenosis after SR. CONCLUSION: Bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis occurred in patients who underwent SR, most of them with a diverting stoma, whereas no cases of stenosis were reported in patients who underwent DE, with or without stoma.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence, risk factors, and management of bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectosigmoid using either disk excision (DE) or segmental resection (SR). DESIGN: Retrospective study using data from consecutive cases recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis database. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Four hundred thirty-one consecutive patients managed for rectosigmoid endometriosis were enrolled in our study. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic SR or DE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients underwent DE, and 266 patients underwent SR. Large nodules ≥3 cm in diameter were more frequent in the SR group (73.3% vs 66.1%), whereas nodules infiltrating the low rectum were 3 times more frequent in the DE group (35.9% vs 11.3%). The frequency of vaginal excision (67.9% vs 62%) and stoma (46.7% vs 44.4%) were comparable between the DE and SR groups. Twenty-three patients presented with postoperative colorectal stenosis after SR (8.6%) versus none after DE (p <.001). Treatment of colorectal stenosis involved dilatation in 20 (87%) cases and SR in 4 (17.4%) cases. For 1 patient, dilatation resulted in rectosigmoid injury requiring SR, followed by rectovaginal fistula. The logistic regression model identified a diverting stoma as the sole risk factor independently related to the risk of postoperative stenosis after SR. CONCLUSION:Bowel stenosis after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis occurred in patients who underwent SR, most of them with a diverting stoma, whereas no cases of stenosis were reported in patients who underwent DE, with or without stoma.
Authors: H Roman; B Merlot; D Forestier; M Noailles; E Magne; T Carteret; J-T Tuech; D C Martin Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 6.918