Literature DB >> 32360640

Glycoproteome in silkworm Bombyx mori and alteration by BmCPV infection.

Feifei Zhu1, Dong Li2, Dandan Song2, Shuhao Huo3, Shangshang Ma2, Peng Lü2, Xiaoyong Liu2, Qin Yao2, Keping Chen4.   

Abstract

The biological functions of protein glycosylation have been increasingly recognized but not yet been very well understood, especially in lower organisms. Silkworm as a model lepidopteran insect and important economic insect, has been widely studied in life science, however, the current knowledge on the glycosylation status of its proteome is not satisfactory, and little is known about how pathogenic infections could affect the glycosylation status. This study performed large scale glycosite mapping for the silkworm Bombyx mori P50 strain, and quantitatively compared with that infected with the Bombyx mori cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (BmCPV). Some 400 glycoproteins were mapped in the silkworm, including N- and O-glycoproteins. Upon virus infection, the glycosylation levels of 41 N-glycopeptides were significantly changed, some of them belonging to transmembrane glycoproteins. The O-glycosylation profiles were also affected. In addition, 4 BmCPV-encoded viral proteins were found to be glycosylated for the first time, including polyhedrin, P101, VP3, and the NS protein. This study drafted a silkworm protein glycosylation map and underlined the potential impact of virus infection on glycosylation. SIGNIFICANCE: This study reveals the characteristics of the glycoproteome in the silkworm strain P50, and quantitatively compared to that infected by the virus BmCPV, which underlines the impact of virus infection on the alteration of protein glycosylation in invertebrate species. Our findings add to the knowledge of the post translational modifications of this model organism, and also uncovered for the first time the glycosylation status of the viral proteins expressed by BmCPV.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BmCPV; Bombxy mori; Glycoproteome; O-glycans; Silkworm

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32360640      PMCID: PMC7194664          DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


Introduction

Silkworm Bombyx mori is an economically important Lepidopteran insect. Since its genome revealed in 2004 [1], it has become an increasingly popular model organism for molecular biology [2]. However, compared to the current knowledge on the silkworm's genome and transcriptome, we do not know much at the proteomic level, especially the status of post translational modifications (PTMs) of the proteome. Glycosylation, being one of the most common and diverse PTMs, has been widely acknowledged in vertebrates as an important indicator of their physiological or pathological state [3], however, very little is known about how glycosylation are altered in lower organisms, like during a pathogen invasion. Such investigations can provide clues to the interactions between glycosylation pathways, inflammatory responses and viral immune escape [4]. The initial steps of viral infections always involve the attachment of viral particles to the receptors on the host cell surface. An important class of the receptors is transmembrane glycoproteins, which play vital roles cell adhesion and receptor bindings [5]. Therefore, glycosylation patterns of the host cell, especially on the cell surface, can influence the interactions between an infecting virus and the host, and identifying such molecules are critical to the understanding of viral infection mechanisms and host immune responses. Once a virus enters the host cell, it hijacks the host's cellular machinery for viral replication, altering numerous biological pathways of the cell, which is evidenced by changes in the expression levels of many genes, transcripts, and proteins. Although several studies have performed transcriptomic and proteomic comparisons on the silkworm upon virus infection, such as by the Bombyx mori cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (BmCPV) [6,7], whether the glycosylation profiles are affected have not been reported. BmCPV is one of the earliest identified viruses infecting silkworms, and often results in significant economic loss to the sericulture industry. BmCPV is a double stranded RNA virus belonging to the Cypovirus genus, Reoviridae family. Its genome contains 10 discrete copacked RNA segments [8], but only a few of them has been cloned and characterized so far [9,10]. The RNA genome is wrapped by 5 structural proteins, namely VP1–5 [11]. The virus forms occlusion bodies in infected silkworm midgut, which is composed of the matrix protein polyhedrin that encloses many visions within the matrix [12]. In this study, we performed large scale glycosylation site mapping on the silkworm strain P50, and quantitatively compared to that infected by BmCPV. The mapping strategy, which was first introduced by Zielinska et al. [13], uses high precision mass spectrometer for detection of a + 2.988 Da mass shift after enzymatic deamidation of the N-glycosylated asparagine residue in O18 water. Taking advantage of the greatly reduced glycosylation complexity due to removal of the N-glycans, we were also able to simultaneously map the O-glycosites and their associated glycans by searching against an insect O-glycan panel. Additionally, the glycosylation profile of the virus-encoded proteins were obtained. Transmembrane glycoproteins and significantly regulated glycoproteins upon virus infection were marked, which provides clues for future investigation of the role of glycosylation during viral infection in invertebrate systems.

Experimental procedures

Silkworm breeding and viral administration

The silkworm P50 strain was obtained from the Institute of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, and the BmCPV virus was graciously given by Prof. Chengxiang Hou at the Sericultural Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhenjiang. The silkworm were reared on fresh mulberry leaves at 25 ± 1 °C and 70–90% relative humidity. On the first day of 5th instar, the silkworm was fed with 5 μL of BmCPV virion at 108 polyhedra/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and the control larvae were fed with PBS. After 72 h, silkworms were harvested and residual mulberry leaves were removed from the gut and then preserved at −80 °C. Biological triplicates in each group were prepared for the following sample processing and analysis.

Protein extraction and digestion

To the silkworm sample, 1.5 mL SDT lysis buffer containing 4% SDS, 100 mM Tris/HCl, and 0.1 M DTT at pH 7.6 was added, and the sample was homogenized in a tissue lyser (Shanghai Jingxin Co., Shanghai, China) using three beating cycles at 120 Hz, 60 s at 4 °C. The solution was then sonicated in an ice bath for 10 min, boiled for 15 min, and then centrifuged at 14000g for 40 min. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was determined by Bradford analysis (ThermoFisher scientific) and stored at −80 °C for further use. The protein extract was aliquoted to a tube containing 400 μg of total protein and was boiled for 5 min, cooled to room temperature, and then mixed with 200 μL of UA buffer (8 M urea, 150 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0). The mixture was transferred to a 10 kD ultrafiltration tube (Merck Millipore) and centrifuged at 14000g at 4 °C for 15 min. The filtrate was discarded and this step was repeated before 100 μL of 100 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) in UA buffer was added. After mixing at 600 rpm for 1 min, the samples were incubated for 20 min in darkness. The filters were washed three times with UA buffer at 14000g, 4 °C for 15 min, then 100 μL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 were added to the filter and the sample was centrifuged for 15 min under the same conditions. This step was repeated twice. Trypsin was added at a ratio of trypsin: protein = 1:50 to the samples and gently mixed for 1 min, and then incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. The filtrate was then collected by centrifugation. The filter was washed with 40 μL 25 mM NH4HCO3 and the filtrate was combined.

Glycopeptide enrichment, O18 deamidation, and LC-MS analysis

The digested peptides was transferred to a new 10 kD filter and mixed with 100 μL lectin mixture containing 2.5 mg/mL Con A, 2.5 mg/mL WGA, and 0.8 mg/mL RCA in buffer A (buffer A = 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 0.5 M NaCl in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.3). After gentle mixing at 600 rpm for 1 min, the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 1 h and then centrifuged at 14000 g for 10 min. The samples were washed by 200 μL buffer A three times. Afterwards, 50 μL of 25 mM NH4HCO3 in H2 18O was added to precondition the filter and discarded by centrifugation. This step was repeated twice. The filter was placed in new collection tube and 40 μL PNGase F (500 units) in 25 mM NH4HCO3 made in H2 18O was added to the filter and the samples were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. The deglycosylated (or deamidated) peptides were eluted by centrifugation and the filter was washed with 25 mM NH4HCO3 in H2 18O twice and the elution was combined. The samples were then desalted using a Zip-Tip (Merck Millipore) protocol according to the manufacture's protocol and ready for LC-MS analysis. The deamidated peptides were loaded onto an Acclaim PepMap100 sample concentrating column (100 μm × 2 cm, Thermo Scientific) and then separated by an C18 capillary column (75 μm × 10 cm, 3 μm). Buffer A contained 0.1% formic acid in water and buffer B was 0.1% formic acid in 84% acetonitrile. The peptide sample was separated at a flow rate of 250 nL/min using a 2 h gradient. MS analysis was performed on a LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). After each full scan, top ten intense precursor ions were isolated and fragmented using HCD at an isolation window of 2 m/z and normalized collision energy of 30 eV.

Data analysis

LC-MS raw data were directed processed by Peaks Studio software (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc.) for identification of proteins and post translational modifications as described previously [14]. Briefly, Silkworm reference proteome (Uniprot ID UP000005204) was used as the protein database, and the parameters used for database searching was: 10 ppm as parent mass tolerance, 0.1 Da as fragment mass tolerance, 2 missed cleavages for tryptic digestion, carbamidomethyl as the fixed modification, methionine oxidation, protein N-terminal acetylation, and asparagine deamidation (+2.988 Da) as the variable modifications. For post translational modifications (PTMs), a series of 38 O-glycan compositions (Table S1) were set as the variable modifications to the threonine or serine residues. A maximum of 5 PTMs were allowed per peptide. The results were further filtrated using the following parameters: de novo average localized score ≥ 50%, unique peptide ≥2, PTM Ascore ≥20, and false discover rate ≤ 1%. For quantitative analysis, Perseus software [15] was used for further data processing and visualization. Briefly, the raw intensities obtained by Peaks software were transformed using natural log, and those had at least two valid intensities among the triplicate in at least one group (control or infected) were retained, and the remaining missing values were replaced with normal distribution (width = 0.3; downshift = 2.6). Student's t-test was performed to obtain statistically different (p < .05) (glyco)peptides between the groups. Gene ontology enrichment was performed using the ShinyGo webserver [16]. Transmembrane topology was predicted using the Phobius web server [17].

Results and discussion

Viral glycoprotein expression in the BmCPV-infected P50 group

Viral glycoproteins play important roles in virus attachment, penetration and uncoating, and serve as a protective shield from the host immune systems [18,19]. Alteration of the glycans on the virus particle can alter the virulence and change the host range [[20], [21], [22]]. Therefore, profiling the glycosylation of virus-encoded proteins are necessary to the functional characterization the protein as well as to the understanding of the mechanisms of viral infection. The glycosylation status of BmCPV viral proteins have not been explored to date. In this study, effective viral propagation in the silkworm was confirmed by expression of the viral proteins in the host body. In the total glycoproteome of the virus-infected silkworm, 4 N-glycoproteins were found to be BmCPV-encoded, whereas no O-glycosylation was detected (Table 1 ). These viral glycoproteins were not found in the control P50 group.
Table 1

N-glycoproteins encoded by the BmCPV virus.

Protein IDProtein namesM.W. (kDa)N-glycosites
B8YCR2Polyhedrin28.5N77
C6K2M9NS Protein44.3N69,N48,N138
C7EWL8P101101.0N684
D3JWE7VP3120.0N801
N-glycoproteins encoded by the BmCPV virus. Polyhedrin, encoded by the genome segment 10 of the BmCPV virus and organized in octameric or dodecameric forms [23], is the major matrix protein surrounding the virus envelope and protects the virions against long term harsh environments. Polyhedrin has typical molecular weight of 27–31 kDa, but no significant sequence similarities were found between the polyhedrins derived from the CPVs of different host species [9,24,25]. While baculovirus polyhedrin has been found with glycosylation potential [23], there has been controversy on whether the cypovirus polyhedrin is glycosylated or not. It has been previously suggested to be glycosylated based on positive color-reactions with acid-Schiff reagent [11], however, molecular cloning of this protein showed that polydedrin does not contain a transmembrane signal peptides which guide peptide glycosylation [9]. In this study, glycosite mapping showed that BmCPV polyhedrin is N-glycosylated at the single site N77, confirming that it is a glycoprotein, and it is speculated that the sugar coating could further enhance the stability and protection of the virion. Another glycoproteins P101, which is a 101 kDa protein encoded by the genome segment 5, was identified with a single glycosylation site at N684, although this protein was predicted with three possible N-glycosylation sites based on motif analysis [26]. The other two viral glycoproteins were VP3, a capping protein [8], which was glycosylated at N801 and the non-structural (NS) protein, which was mapped with three glycosylation sites at N69, N48, and N138. The functions of these viral proteins have not been clarified or experimentally validated so far, and even less is known about what their glycosylation does for these proteins during virus infections. Therefore, it would be of great interest to investigate these glycosylated viral proteins and their roles during virus infection.

Characteristics of the P50 silkworm N-glycoproteome

A total of 762 N-glycopeptides belonging to 389 N-glycoproteins were identified in the P50 control and BmCPV-infected groups (Table S2), revealing a high level of glycosylation in this lepidopteran insect. More than 95% of the mapped glycoproteins were within 200 kDa, and a significant portion of them were closely resided within 10–100 kDa (Fig. 1a). The N-glycoproteins were predominantly singly or doubly glycosylated, although 14 of them were mapped with more than 5 glycosites per protein (Fig. 1b). Fig. 1c showed that all the 762 identified glycosylation site has the consensus sequence N-X-T/S, demonstrating the highly conserved motif required for N-glycosylation. Among the 389 identified N-glycoproteins, 118 were predicted to be transmembrane glycoproteins (Table S3), which can be interesting candidates to explore as potential cell surface receptors to outside pathogens. The total glycoproteins identified in the silkworm were analyzed by gene ontology (GO) enrichment in the category of biological process, indicating that the silkworm glycoproteome mainly involve in metabolic processes, cell adhesion, and proteolysis processes (Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1

Characteristics of the silkworm N-glycoproteome. (a) Molecular weight distribution of silkworm N-glycoproteins in the P50 strain, (b) distribution of the number of N-glycoproteins having a particular number of N-glycosites, (c) sequence motif analysis centered on the N-glycosylation site, and (d) top10 enriched GO terms in biological processes (p < .05) for the 389 total glycoproteins identified in silkworm.

Characteristics of the silkworm N-glycoproteome. (a) Molecular weight distribution of silkworm N-glycoproteins in the P50 strain, (b) distribution of the number of N-glycoproteins having a particular number of N-glycosites, (c) sequence motif analysis centered on the N-glycosylation site, and (d) top10 enriched GO terms in biological processes (p < .05) for the 389 total glycoproteins identified in silkworm. Table 2 lists the top 20 most abundant N-glycoproteins in the P50 silkworm. The silkworm storage protein is the most abundant glycoprotein in the P50 silkworm. It plays important roles in insect metamorphosis and development, and may involve in the innate immune response to pathogens [27,28]. Previous study indicated that it is a glycoprotein [29], but the specific sites were not known. In this study, the storage protein is mapped with three N-glycosites at N208, N519, and N598. The second most abundant silkworm N-glycoprotein is a putative cuticle protein glycosylated at N66. Although many insect cuticle proteins were found to be glycosylated [30], the functions of these modifications are not yet clear. The protein containing the highest number of glycosite was H9JRT0, with 10 N-glycosites, and was the eighth most abundant N-glycoprotein. However, it has not been characterized at the protein level. As Table 2 shows, a lot of the glycoproteins are “uncharacterized”, thus continued effort are needed to investigate their structures and functions, including their glycosylation status.
Table 2

Top 20 most abundant N-glycoproteins in the silkworm P50 strain.a

Protein IDProtein namesM.W. (kDa)N-glycositesGene names
H9JHM9Silkworm storage protein82.8N208, N519, N598sp3
C0H6L5Putative cuticle protein12.6N66BmorCPR24
H9J9M0Chitin-binding type-2 domain-containing protein61.4N244, N296, N274, N300101,740,647
H9J8C7Uncharacterized protein16.4N51, N67
H9J9M1Uncharacterized protein65.3N330
H9J1A5SERPIN domain-containing protein44.4N23, N140, N334
H9JPK1Uncharacterized protein58.0N93101,736,296
H9JRT0Uncharacterized protein425.7N43, N959, N1164, N1385, N2105, N2374, N2688,N2745, N2866, N3597,
H9JWX6Collagen IV NC1 domain-containing protein178.1N16, N220
H9JIA9Uncharacterized protein22.2N80
H9JPG9Transferrin71.7N318
G9FL14DNA supercoiling factor38.0N177LOC692759
Q9XXV0Phenoloxidase-activating enzyme48.0N239, N334PPAE
H9JRS9SEA domain-containing protein40.5N225, N138
H9J1S1Uncharacterized protein78.9N130, N315, N591
H9JTG9Aldo-keto reductase AKR2E434.4N161akr2e
H9JRR1Uncharacterized protein81.1N170, N345, N463, N534
H9JB73Uncharacterized protein23.8N111
H9J1X5Uncharacterized protein57.1N43, N237
H9JXY5Uncharacterized protein44.7N202, N317101,741,915

Based on the average intensity of its most abundant N-glycopeptides.

Top 20 most abundant N-glycoproteins in the silkworm P50 strain.a Based on the average intensity of its most abundant N-glycopeptides.

Quantitative comparison of the N-glycoproteomes between control and BmCPV-infected P50 strains

To understand how protein glycosylation status is affected by viral infection, the total glycoproteomes in the P50 control and BmCPV-infected groups were analyzed and compared. For reliable quantitative comparison between the glycoproteomes, the data were further filtered retaining those detected at least twice in the triplicate in at least one group. This yields 489 glycopeptides belonging to 287 glycoproteins (Table S4), which were then used for quantitative comparison between the control and BmCPV-infected group. The glycopeptide intensities within each group are highly replicable (Fig. 2a), as demonstrated by low discrepancy in intensity between the replicates. Majority of the glycopeptide intensities in the replicates were within 10% from each other.
Fig. 2

Quantitative comparison between the N-glycoproteomes of the control and virus-infected groups. (a) Data discrepancy of the glycopeptide intensities within the triplicate measurement for each group, (b) GO analysis in terms of biological process for the 41 differentially regulated glycoproteins upon BmNPV infection, the heat maps of the (c) significantly downregulated and (d) significantly upregulated N-glycopeptides between the control and BmCPV-infected P50 strains.

Quantitative comparison between the N-glycoproteomes of the control and virus-infected groups. (a) Data discrepancy of the glycopeptide intensities within the triplicate measurement for each group, (b) GO analysis in terms of biological process for the 41 differentially regulated glycoproteins upon BmNPV infection, the heat maps of the (c) significantly downregulated and (d) significantly upregulated N-glycopeptides between the control and BmCPV-infected P50 strains. A heat map was constructed to compare the identified glycopeptides in the two groups (Fig. S1), which showed that majority of the N-glycopeptides had a similar profile between the control and the virus-infected groups. Statistically significant (p < .05) glycopeptides between the two groups were shown in Fig. 2c and d. A total of 14 glycopeptides were significantly downregulated in the virus-infected group, and another 27 glycopeptides significantly upregulated. Among them, 9 were predicted transmembrane proteins (Table S3). These 41 differentially regulated glycoproteins were categorized in metabolic processes, cell adhesion as well as in response to stimulus (Fig. 2b), indicating a change of molecular interactions by the virus infection. There have been evidences that pathogens can hijack host's glycosylation system to manipulate immune responses to the advantage of the pathogen [4]. Thus, the changes in the glycosylation level can modulate cellular and molecular functions, which is likely for the purpose of increasing the host susceptibility to the infection. Again, a lot glycoproteins were uncharacterized, and further investigations on these proteins may be necessary and insightful for understanding the molecular mechanisms during the virus infection. Among the 14 downregulated glycopeptides, the signal sequence receptor (SSR, Q2F5L0) showed the most significant difference (p = 2.5 × 10−6) (Fig. 2c). SSR is an integral, glycosylated protein of the rough ER membrane and mediates the translocation of a peptide across the ER membrane [31]. The significant downregulation of SSR indicates that BmCPV infection may induce ER stress and influence the glycosylation level of SSR as a part of the ER stress response. The significantly upregulated glycopeptides include several enzyme classes such as oxidases and peptidases, and several other proteins including DNA supercoiling factor, serpin, and integrin beta (Fig. 2d). Among these, integrin beta are a family of evolutionarily conserved transmembrane glycoproteins that mediate bidirectional transmembrane signaling and cell to cell interactions, and are important in many physiological and pathological processes [32]. Previous studies showed that silkworm integrin beta interacts with the BmCPV virion, and that silencing integrin beta gene could inhibit viral infection to the silkworm [33]. Our data showed that integrin beta was upregulated during BmCPV infection, indicating its potential role as a cell adhesion receptor facilitating viral propagation. Sepin, a glycosylated serin protease inhibitor, was previously found significantly upregulated in the bacteria-infected fat body of the silkworm [34], similar to what we observed in the silkworm upon viral infection in this study. It is noted that the ecdysone oxidase and another glycoprotein (H9IUI0) both contain two glycopeptides that were downregulated. However, another interesting observation is that while the glycopeptide (N181) of SSR was downregulated, its glycopeptide at N126 wass upregulated. The results indicate that while viral infection affects the level of protein glycosylation, it may or may not influence in the same way. Therefore, to evaluate or compare the profiles of multiply glycosylated proteins, it is necessary to locate individual glycopeptides instead of the glycoprotein as a whole, because each glycosylation site might change independently from the rest of the glycosylation sites upon perturbation or stimuli.

O-glycan profiles of the control and BmCPV-infected P50 silkworms

Unlike N-glycosylation, O-glycosylation sites do not have a consensus sequence, and deglycosylation could not be achieved by a universal enzyme currently. Due to the high diversity of O-glycosylation and its close association with various pathological and physiological states, the ability to reveal the O-glycans and their attached sites, especially in a large scale, becomes very demanding. In this study, due to the deamidation process that removes the N-glycans from the peptide, the workload for database searching was greatly reduced, which makes it possible to perform large scale O-glycosylation mapping at the same time during N-glycosite mapping. The O-glycosylation mapping results for the P50 control and virus-infected groups were shown in Table 3 . Only those identified at least twice in the triplicate were retained for comparison purposes. A total of 13 O-glycoproteins were mapped in the P50 and its BmCPV-infected strains. The most frequently occurred O-glycans were fucose (F) and HexNAc (N), followed by Hex1HexNAc2 (H1N2), HexNAc2 (N2), HexNAc3 (N3) and HexHexNAcFuc (H1N1F1). A lot of the O-glycoproteins are also N-glycosylated (Table 3). It was noticed that the uncharacterized protein H9IXN5 contain a surprisingly large number of N-glycosite: a total of 20, in addition to the O-glycosite identified (Table 3). A protein coverage map with its supporting peptides for this unknown but interesting protein was shown in Fig. S2, demonstrating a reliable glycosite mapping of this protein.
Table 3

O-glycosylation profiles of control and BmCPV-infected P50 silkworms.a

Protein IDProtein namesM.W. (kDa)N-glycositesO-glycosites (glycan)
ControlCPV-infected
H9JXG1Uncharacterized protein123.6N152S824(H1N2)S824(H1N2)
H9JRT0Uncharacterized protein425.7N43, N959, N1164, N1385, N2105, N2374, N2688, N2745, N2866, N3597T2673(N1)
H9IXN5Uncharacterized protein405.1N177, N411, N908, N1035, N1260, N1317, N1689, N2015, N2091, N2114, N2241, N2276, N2341, N2451, N2491, N2759, N3024, N3097, N3109, N3525T1905(H1)
H9J6Y6Uncharacterized protein15.8N72T70(F1); S71(F1)T70(F1); S71(F1)
H9JHM9Silkworm storage protein82.8N208, N519, N598S210(F1)
O02387Larval cuticle protein LCP-1715.3N52, N97S104(N1)
H9JTY5Uncharacterized protein69.3N403S412(N3)
H9J9M1Uncharacterized protein65.3N330T151(N1)T151(N1)
Q1HPS0Myosin regulatory light chain 222.0S104(F1); S124(F1)S121(F1)
H9J9M0Chitin-binding type-2 domain-containing protein61.4N244, N296, N274, N300S295(H1)
H9JTA0Dynein light chain10.4S14(N2)
H9J609Uncharacterized protein100.2S765(H1N1F1)

The O-glycosites and glycans were detected at least twice among the triplicate.

O-glycosylation profiles of control and BmCPV-infected P50 silkworms.a The O-glycosites and glycans were detected at least twice among the triplicate. Myosin regulatory light chain (RLC), an important structural element of myosin, is critical to cell movement and muscle contractions. RLC is a well-known phosphoprotein and its dynamic phosphorylation state is tissue-specific and case-specific [35,36]. However, it has not been reported to be glycosylated before. In this study, silkworm RLC was found to be O-fucosylated at S104, S121 or S124, depending on whether the silkworm was infected with the virus or not. The silkworm larval cuticle protein LCP-17 was found to be N-glycosylated at N52 and N97 in both groups but only O-glycosylated in the control group at site S104 (Table 3). On the other hand, the silkworm storage protein (H9JHM9) and the uncharacterized proteins H9JRT0, H9JTY5, H9J9M0, H9JTA0, and H9J609 were not detected with O-glycosylation in the control, but were found with O-glycosylation in the virus-infected group. The glycosylation profiles of the proteins H9JXG1, H9J9M1 and H9J6Y6, all of which are uncharacterized proteins, remain unchanged after virus infection. Previously, we have characterized the glycoproteome for two other silkworm strains, 306 and NB. By comparing to the current study, it was noticed that the arylphorin protein, a type of the storage proteins, was heavily O-glycosylated in the 306 and NB strains [14], however, it was not being modified by O-glycosylation in the P50 strain, neither in the control nor BmCPV-infected groups. The silkworm storage protein (H9JHM9), myosin regulatory light chain 2 (Q1HPS0), and several other uncharacterized proteins (H9JRT0, H9JXG1, H9J9M0) were found to be O-glycosylated in all P50, 306 and NB strains, although the glycosylation site and glycan profiles were somewhat different (Table S5). The changes in glycosylation states, together with other molecular differences such as genetic mutations, may contribute to the different responses these strains develop to virus invasions. It has been well established that alteration of glycosylation is closely associated with changes in physiological and pathological states. Our previous study also showed that baculovirus resistant and susceptible silkworm strains were differentially glycosylated [14]. Combining the results from this study, which showed that viral infection altered protein glycosylation in the silkworm, the relationships between host glycosylation and virus/microbe infection can be intertwined: 1) host glycosylation changes lead to infection and inflammation, 2) infection and inflammation lead to host glycosylation changes, which leads to molecular and cellular functional differences. Glycosylation modification is highly dynamic and can be affected by many cellular factors and processes. During BmCPV infection, the silkworm's cellular machinery was hijacked and many biological pathways were altered, including the glycosylation pathway. In this study, the total glycoproteome in the silkworm P50, including the N- and O-glycosylation status was uncovered. Some 400 N- and O-glycoproteins were confidently mapped, including 118 transmembrane glycoproteins, indicating a rich, complex and yet much unknown glycoproteome. Quantitative comparison showed that the glycosylation levels of about 40 proteins, including the transmembrane glycoproteins signal sequence receptor and integrin beta, were significantly changed after the virus infection. These glycoproteins are therefore of particular interest to study the relation between glycosylation level, inflammatory responses, and the virus immune escape. Additionally, four proteins encoded by the BmCPV genome were mapped with N-glycosylation, revealing for the first time the glycosylation status of the BmCPV-encoded viral proteins.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.
  33 in total

1.  The dsRNA viruses.

Authors:  Peter Mertens
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.303

2.  A draft sequence for the genome of the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori).

Authors:  Qingyou Xia; Zeyang Zhou; Cheng Lu; Daojun Cheng; Fangyin Dai; Bin Li; Ping Zhao; Xingfu Zha; Tingcai Cheng; Chunli Chai; Guoqing Pan; Jinshan Xu; Chun Liu; Ying Lin; Jifeng Qian; Yong Hou; Zhengli Wu; Guanrong Li; Minhui Pan; Chunfeng Li; Yihong Shen; Xiqian Lan; Lianwei Yuan; Tian Li; Hanfu Xu; Guangwei Yang; Yongji Wan; Yong Zhu; Maode Yu; Weide Shen; Dayang Wu; Zhonghuai Xiang; Jun Yu; Jun Wang; Ruiqiang Li; Jianping Shi; Heng Li; Guangyuan Li; Jianning Su; Xiaoling Wang; Guoqing Li; Zengjin Zhang; Qingfa Wu; Jun Li; Qingpeng Zhang; Ning Wei; Jianzhe Xu; Haibo Sun; Le Dong; Dongyuan Liu; Shengli Zhao; Xiaolan Zhao; Qingshun Meng; Fengdi Lan; Xiangang Huang; Yuanzhe Li; Lin Fang; Changfeng Li; Dawei Li; Yongqiao Sun; Zhenpeng Zhang; Zheng Yang; Yanqing Huang; Yan Xi; Qiuhui Qi; Dandan He; Haiyan Huang; Xiaowei Zhang; Zhiqiang Wang; Wenjie Li; Yuzhu Cao; Yingpu Yu; Hong Yu; Jinhong Li; Jiehua Ye; Huan Chen; Yan Zhou; Bin Liu; Jing Wang; Jia Ye; Hai Ji; Shengting Li; Peixiang Ni; Jianguo Zhang; Yong Zhang; Hongkun Zheng; Bingyu Mao; Wen Wang; Chen Ye; Songgang Li; Jian Wang; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Huanming Yang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Biochemical properties of polyhedra and virus particles of the cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus of Bombyx mori.

Authors:  C C Payne; J Kalmakoff
Journal:  Intervirology       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.763

4.  iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis of midgut in silkworm infected with Bombyx mori cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus.

Authors:  Kun Gao; Xiang-Yuan Deng; Meng-Ke Shang; Guang-Xing Qin; Cheng-Xiang Hou; Xi-Jie Guo
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 5.  Infection, inflammation and host carbohydrates: a Glyco-Evasion Hypothesis.

Authors:  Lori Sc Kreisman; Brian A Cobb
Journal:  Glycobiology       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.313

6.  Role of N-linked glycosylation of the 5-HT2A receptor in JC virus infection.

Authors:  Melissa S Maginnis; Sheila A Haley; Gretchen V Gee; Walter J Atwood
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  Phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain by myosin light chain kinase, and muscle contraction.

Authors:  Seiji Takashima
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 2.993

8.  Nucleotide sequence of the polyhedrin gene of Euxoa scandens cytoplasmic polyhedrosis virus (EsCPV).

Authors:  F Fossiez; S Belloncik; M Arella
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 9.  Glycosylation in health and disease.

Authors:  Colin Reily; Tyler J Stewart; Matthew B Renfrow; Jan Novak
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 42.439

10.  The Epstein-Barr Virus Glycoprotein gp150 Forms an Immune-Evasive Glycan Shield at the Surface of Infected Cells.

Authors:  Anna M Gram; Timo Oosenbrug; Marthe F S Lindenbergh; Christian Büll; Anouskha Comvalius; Kathryn J I Dickson; Joop Wiegant; Hans Vrolijk; Robert Jan Lebbink; Ron Wolterbeek; Gosse J Adema; Marieke Griffioen; Mirjam H M Heemskerk; David C Tscharke; Lindsey M Hutt-Fletcher; Emmanuel J H J Wiertz; Rob C Hoeben; Maaike E Ressing
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 6.823

View more
  1 in total

1.  BmCPV-Derived Circular DNA vcDNA-S7 Mediated by Bombyx mori Reverse Transcriptase (RT) Regulates BmCPV Infection.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Jun Pan; Xinyu Tong; Qunnan Qiu; Xing Zhang; Yaxin Zhang; Sufei Sun; Yongjie Feng; Renyu Xue; Guangli Cao; Xiaolong Hu; Chengliang Gong
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 7.561

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.