Literature DB >> 32360633

Live birth after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: which endometrial preparation protocol is better?

Gulnaz Sahin1, Ferruh Acet2, Nilufer Calimlioglu2, Reci Meseri3, Ege Nazan Tavmergen Goker2, Erol Tavmergen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of modified natural cycle (mNC) and artificial cycle (AC) protocols for frozen embryo transfers.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 490 frozen-thawed autologous embryo transfer cycles, performed in a single tertiary IVF center, between January 2015 and September 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 214 cycles were performed after mNC and 276 cycles were performed after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist plus sequential estrogen and progestin priming protocol. The primary outcome was live birth and secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, implantation and miscarriage rates. Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust covariates on clinical outcome.
RESULTS: The rates of live birth (33.6 % vs. 29.3 %, respectively), clinical pregnancy (40.2 % vs. 36.6 %, respectively), implantation (32.3 % vs. 28.5 %, respectively), and miscarriage (5.1 % vs. 6.9 %, respectively) were not different between the mNC and AC groups. Multivariate analysis also showed that the method for endometrial preparation had no significant effect on clinical pregnancy and live birth. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) of live births and clinical pregnancies were 0.97 (95 % CI 0.64-1.48) and 0.98 (95 % CI 0.65-1.46) for the AC compared to mNC group. However, there was a significant difference between mNC and AC in cycles in which double embryo transfer was performed. The live birth (48 % vs. 31.4 %P= 0.01) and clinical pregnancy rates (53.9 % vs. 38.8 %, P= 0.02) were significantly higher in the mNC group than the AC group for double embryo transfers.
CONCLUSION: The live birth and clinical pregnancy rates are comparable between mNC and AC with GnRH agonists in frozen thawed embryo transfer cycles. In ovulatory patients with planned double embryo transfer, mNC can be considered. Further well-designed prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial cycle; Endometrial preparation; Live birth rates; Modified natural cycle; frozen–thawed embryo transfer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32360633     DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod        ISSN: 2468-7847


  5 in total

1.  Analysis of Relevant Factors Affecting the Pregnancy Rate of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycle.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Yuhong Wang; Jing Lu; Xihui Zhang; Yunjing Zhang; Haijun Zhao; Yijiao Zhang; Wenliang Chang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Comparison of natural and artificial cycles in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A retrospective analysis of 1696 cycles.

Authors:  Erhan Demirdağ; İsmail Güler; Münire Funda Cevher Akdulum; Esin Şahin; Ayşe Duygu Tufan; Ahmet Erdem; Mehmet Erdem
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Frozen Blastocyst Embryo Transfer: Comparison of Protocols and Factors Influencing Outcome.

Authors:  Aikaterini Eleftheriadou; Abraham Francis; Mark Wilcox; Kanna Jayaprakasan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Clinical outcomes of personalized frozen-thawed embryo transfer timing for patients with recurrent implantation failure.

Authors:  Lifei Li; Zhijian Kou; Yujie Fu; Lanlan Liang; Lin Liu; Xuehong Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

5.  Treatment outcomes of blastocysts thaw cycles, comparing the presence and absence of a corpus luteum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joscelyn Gan; Genia Rozen; Alex Polyakov
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.006

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.