Literature DB >> 3236061

The accessory optic system of rabbit. II. Spatial organization of direction selectivity.

J I Simpson1, C S Leonard, R E Soodak.   

Abstract

1. To compare the spatial organization of the direction selectivity of neurons in the medial terminal nucleus (MTN) of the accessory optic system with that of neurons in the adjacent ventral tegmentum, extracellular single-unit recordings were made in the anesthetized rabbit. The ventral tegmental neurons were located in a region called the visual tegmental relay zone (VTRZ), which is defined by the ventral tegmental terminal field of contralaterally projecting MTN neurons. 2. Some of the present sample of MTN neurons (5 of 34) had monocular receptive fields composed of two parts distinguished by a marked difference in the orientation of their respective direction-selective tuning curves. For one part of the receptive field the preferred excitatory direction was "up," while for the other part it was "down." Such receptive fields for one eye were called bipartite, whereas the more usually encountered MTN receptive fields, which could be characterized by a single direction-selective tuning curve, were called uniform. 3. Of the 16 neurons recorded from the VTRZ, all but one were binocular. For these neurons, both uniform and bipartite receptive fields were found for each eye alone. The only monocular neuron encountered in the VTRZ had a contralateral, bipartite receptive field. 4. The spatial organization of the direction selectivity of bipartite receptive fields strongly suggests that they are suited to represent rotation of the visual field about a horizontal axis located in the vertical plane that divides the receptive field into two parts. 5. The boundary between the two parts of the bipartite receptive fields was found using handheld visual stimuli at one of two azimuthal locations, either close to 45 degrees or between 95 and 125 degrees (the 0 degree reference was rostral in the midsagittal plane). This particular structure of the bipartite receptive fields suggests that their preferred rotation axes have a close spatial relation to the best-response axes of the semicircular canals. 6. Seven VTRZ neurons were antidromically activated by electrical stimulation of the ipsilateral dorsal cap of the inferior olive. Since the receptive fields of VTRZ neurons have many of the structural features characteristic of the receptive fields of rostral dorsal cap neurons we conclude that the spatial organization of the receptive fields of dorsal cap neurons is, for the most part, synthesized prior to the inferior olive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3236061     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1988.60.6.2055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  27 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent spatiotemporal tuning properties of non-eye movement related vestibular neurons to three-dimensional translations in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Chiju Chen-Huang; Barry W Peterson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Synaptic inputs and timing underlying the velocity tuning of direction-selective ganglion cells in rabbit retina.

Authors:  Benjamin Sivyer; Michiel van Wyk; David I Vaney; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Purkinje cells in the vestibulocerebellum of the pigeon respond best to either translational or rotational wholefield visual motion.

Authors:  D R Wylie; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The visual response properties of neurons in the nucleus of the basal optic root of the pigeon: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  D R Wylie; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Patterns of neck muscle activation in cats during reflex and voluntary head movements.

Authors:  E A Keshner; J F Baker; J Banovetz; B W Peterson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Direction tuning of individual retinal inputs to the turtle accessory optic system.

Authors:  N Kogo; D M Rubio; M Ariel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Comparison of optomotor and optokinetic reflexes in mice.

Authors:  Friedrich Kretschmer; Momina Tariq; Walid Chatila; Beverly Wu; Tudor Constantin Badea
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Genetic access to neurons in the accessory optic system reveals a role for Sema6A in midbrain circuitry mediating motion perception.

Authors:  Brendan N Lilley; Shai Sabbah; John L Hunyara; Katherine D Gribble; Timour Al-Khindi; Jiali Xiong; Zhuhao Wu; David M Berson; Alex L Kolodkin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-11-11       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Nonvisual complex spike signals in the rabbit cerebellar flocculus.

Authors:  Beerend H J Winkelman; Tim Belton; Minah Suh; Michiel Coesmans; Menno M Morpurgo; John I Simpson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Receptive field organization of climbing fiber afferents responding to optokinetic stimulation in the cerebellar nodulus and flocculus of the pigmented rabbit.

Authors:  M S Kano; M Kano; K Maekawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.