Literature DB >> 32360478

Emerging key laboratory tests for patients with COVID-19.

Peter A Kavsak1, Kerstin de Wit2, Andrew Worster2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Clinical chemistry; Emergency setting; Laboratory tests

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32360478      PMCID: PMC7192114          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


× No keyword cloud information.
Listed below are six key laboratory tests/areas that have an important role in monitoring patients with COVID-19 with specific tests/scores highlighted in Table 1 . Additional resources for laboratory related testing may be found at the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine website (IFCC Information Guide on COVID-19: https://www.ifcc.org/ifcc-news/2020–03-26-ifcc-information-guide-on-covid-19/).
Table 1

Emerging key laboratory tests for patients with COVID-19.

Laboratory TestRole in COVID-19
Lymphocyte count

At least 75% of patients have a count <1.5 × 109/L [1], [2], [3].

Patients with persistently low counts during hospitalization have a poor prognosis [1].

C-reactive protein (CRP)

CRP median concentrations differ between non-survivors (n = 113) versus survivors (n = 161) (113 mg/L vs. 26 mg/L) as does ferritin (1418 µg/L vs. 481 mg/L) and IL-6 (72 ng/L vs. 13 ng/L) [2].

Before convalescent plasma transfusion the median CRP concentration in 5 COVID-19 patients was 163 mg/L and at 12-days post-transfusion with no virus detected the median CRP concentration was 6 mg/L [4]. Of note, CRP concentrations <10 mg/L typically indicate no appreciable acute phase response.

Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

Using an overall cutoff of >40 U/L approximately 30% of COVID-19 patients had liver injury at admission [1], [3].

The rate of liver injury could be higher in females as the upper limit of normal is typically lower in females as compared to males.

D-dimer

At admission 50% of patients who survived had concentrations <0.6 µg/mL while the non-survivors at least 75% had concentrations >1.3 µg/mL [1], [2].

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin

At admission, 50% of the survivors had a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentration ≤3 ng/L (a low normal level) [1], [2].

Clinical Scores

Creatinine, total bilirubin, pO2 and platelet count are used for the SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score; while urea is used for the CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age ≥65 years) score [1]. Lactate levels are also used to identify septic shock.

Complete blood count (CBC) with differential The three CBC findings of poor prognosis are: leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, and lymphocytopenia [1], [2], [3]. Lymphocytopenia occurs across populations regardless of co-infection. Whether poor prognosis is associated with lymphocytopenia below the reference interval or absolute count is unclear. Acute phase response and inflammatory biomarkers COVID-19 patients have high concentrations of the acute phase response proteins (i.e., c-reactive protein [CRP] and ferritin) and inflammatory biomarkers (i.e., cytokines such as Interleukin-6; IL-6) at admission [1], [2]. CRP is more widely available, and is a sensitive biomarker of inflammation and tissue damage that is increased at admission and during hospitalization [2], [4]. Kidney, liver and cardiac injury Kidney injury prevalence (via creatinine measurement) at admission is unknown but 11–15% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients may have acute kidney injury [1], [2]. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations at admission range from 22% to 32% and cardiac injury (via cardiac troponin measurement) has been reported to range from 15% to 44% [1], [2], [3]. Other liver biomarkers are reported to be increased; however, ALT is more specific for liver injury and is also less affected by pre-analytical factors such as hemolysis. Tests which may indicate improvement Following recovery and 7-days post-convalescent plasma transfusion, CRP levels decreased by >10-fold, which was more pronounced than IL-6 and procalcitonin (~2-fold difference) [4]. Procalcitonin is a useful indicator for bacterial infections, though not all patients with COVID-19 have bacterial co-infections [3], [4]. Prognostic biomarkers D-dimer and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin can also identify COVID-19 patients who are at low- and high-risk for death [1], [2], [5]. D-dimer is used in decision making for disseminated intravascular coagulation, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and is given a high priority of testing in patients with COVID-19 [5]. While for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin, normal or low concentrations (typically below 5 ng/L, but cutoffs are assay specific) identifies patients at low-risk for cardiovascular outcomes and death in many different populations, including COVID-19 patients [1], [2]. Clinical scores Two clinical scores that may also identify patients with COVID-19 at low- and high-risk for death are the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score used in sepsis and the confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and age ≥65 years (CURB-65) score in the assessment of severity in patients with community acquired pneumonia. Both clinical scores require laboratory testing. Emerging key laboratory tests for patients with COVID-19. At least 75% of patients have a count <1.5 × 109/L [1], [2], [3]. Patients with persistently low counts during hospitalization have a poor prognosis [1]. CRP median concentrations differ between non-survivors (n = 113) versus survivors (n = 161) (113 mg/L vs. 26 mg/L) as does ferritin (1418 µg/L vs. 481 mg/L) and IL-6 (72 ng/L vs. 13 ng/L) [2]. Before convalescent plasma transfusion the median CRP concentration in 5 COVID-19 patients was 163 mg/L and at 12-days post-transfusion with no virus detected the median CRP concentration was 6 mg/L [4]. Of note, CRP concentrations <10 mg/L typically indicate no appreciable acute phase response. Using an overall cutoff of >40 U/L approximately 30% of COVID-19 patients had liver injury at admission [1], [3]. The rate of liver injury could be higher in females as the upper limit of normal is typically lower in females as compared to males. At admission 50% of patients who survived had concentrations <0.6 µg/mL while the non-survivors at least 75% had concentrations >1.3 µg/mL [1], [2]. At admission, 50% of the survivors had a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentration ≤3 ng/L (a low normal level) [1], [2]. Creatinine, total bilirubin, pO2 and platelet count are used for the SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score; while urea is used for the CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure and age ≥65 years) score [1]. Lactate levels are also used to identify septic shock. Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr. Kavsak has received grants/reagents/consultant/advisor/ honoraria from serval diagnostic companies, including Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Point of Care, Beckman Coulter, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Randox Laboratories, Roche Diagnostics and Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. McMaster University has filed patents with Dr. Kavsak listed as an inventor in the acute cardiovascular biomarker field. Dr de Wit has received a research grant from Bayer.
  5 in total

1.  Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma.

Authors:  Chenguang Shen; Zhaoqin Wang; Fang Zhao; Yang Yang; Jinxiu Li; Jing Yuan; Fuxiang Wang; Delin Li; Minghui Yang; Li Xing; Jinli Wei; Haixia Xiao; Yan Yang; Jiuxin Qu; Ling Qing; Li Chen; Zhixiang Xu; Ling Peng; Yanjie Li; Haixia Zheng; Feng Chen; Kun Huang; Yujing Jiang; Dongjing Liu; Zheng Zhang; Yingxia Liu; Lei Liu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID-19.

Authors:  Jecko Thachil; Ning Tang; Satoshi Gando; Anna Falanga; Marco Cattaneo; Marcel Levi; Cary Clark; Toshiaki Iba
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  Covid-19 in Critically Ill Patients in the Seattle Region - Case Series.

Authors:  Pavan K Bhatraju; Bijan J Ghassemieh; Michelle Nichols; Richard Kim; Keith R Jerome; Arun K Nalla; Alexander L Greninger; Sudhakar Pipavath; Mark M Wurfel; Laura Evans; Patricia A Kritek; T Eoin West; Andrew Luks; Anthony Gerbino; Chris R Dale; Jason D Goldman; Shane O'Mahony; Carmen Mikacenic
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: retrospective study.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Di Wu; Huilong Chen; Weiming Yan; Danlei Yang; Guang Chen; Ke Ma; Dong Xu; Haijing Yu; Hongwu Wang; Tao Wang; Wei Guo; Jia Chen; Chen Ding; Xiaoping Zhang; Jiaquan Huang; Meifang Han; Shusheng Li; Xiaoping Luo; Jianping Zhao; Qin Ning
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-03-26

5.  Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fei Zhou; Ting Yu; Ronghui Du; Guohui Fan; Ying Liu; Zhibo Liu; Jie Xiang; Yeming Wang; Bin Song; Xiaoying Gu; Lulu Guan; Yuan Wei; Hui Li; Xudong Wu; Jiuyang Xu; Shengjin Tu; Yi Zhang; Hua Chen; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 79.321

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) prevention and treatment methods and effective parameters: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Amir Masoud Rahmani; Seyedeh Yasaman Hosseini Mirmahaleh
Journal:  Sustain Cities Soc       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 10.696

2.  Characteristics and laboratory findings on admission to the emergency department among 2873 hospitalized patients with COVID-19: the impact of adjusted laboratory tests in multicenter studies. A multicenter study in Spain (BIOCOVID-Spain study).

Authors:  Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo; Daniel Morell-García; Cristian Morales-Indiano; Josep Miquel Bauça; María José Alcaide Martín; Clara Esparza Del Valle; Jose I Gutiérrez Revilla; Eloisa Urrechaga; José M Álamo; Ana M Hernando Holgado; María-Carmen Lorenzo-Lozano; Silvia Sánchez Fdez-Pacheco; Patricia de la Hera Cagigal; María A Juncos Tobarra; Juan A Vílchez; Isabel Vírseda Chamorro; Irene Gutiérrez Garcia; Yolanda Pastor Murcia; Laura Sahuquillo Frías; Laura Altimira Queral; Elisa Nuez-Zaragoza; Juan Adell Ruiz de León; Alicia Ruiz Ripa; Paloma Salas Gómez-Pablos; Iria Cebreiros López; Amaia Fernández Uriarte; Álex Larruzea; María L López Yepes; Patricia Esteban Torrella; María C Zamorano Andrés; Jose Pedregosa Díaz; Cristina Acevedo Alcaraz; Alfonso-L Blazquez-Manzanera; Ana M L Padilla Jiménez; María C Baamonde Calzada; Marina Vera; Matilde Cháfer Rudilla; Magdalena Canalda Campás; Sara García Muñoz; Luis Vicente Gutiérrez; Laura Jiménez Añón; Alfonso Pérez Martínez; Aurelio Pons Castillo; Ruth González Tamayo; Jorge Férriz Vivancos; Olaia Rodríguez-Fraga; Vicente Ferrer Díaz de Brito Fernández; Vicente Aguadero; María G García Arévalo; María Arnaldos Carrillo; Mercedes González Morales; María Núñez Gárate; Cristina Ruiz Iruela; Natalia Sancho-Rodríguez; Marti Vila Pérez; José M Egea-Caparrós; Luis Sáenz; Álvaro Blasco Barbero; Amparo Galán Ortega
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.713

Review 3.  COVID-19 screening protocols for preoperative assessment of head and neck cancer patients candidate for elective surgery in the midst of the pandemic: A narrative review with comparison between two Italian institutions.

Authors:  Marco Ferrari; Alberto Paderno; Lorenzo Giannini; Diego Cazzador; Cristina Ciardiello; Giovanni Carretta; Cesare Piazza; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 4.  A Telemedicine Approach to Covid-19 Assessment and Triage.

Authors:  Allison B Reiss; Joshua De Leon; Isaac P Dapkins; George Shahin; Morgan R Peltier; Eric R Goldberg
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.