Kwan Hong1, Hari Hwang2, Helin Han3, Jaeeun Chae3, Jimi Choi3, Yujin Jeong3, Juneyoung Lee3, Kyung Ju Lee4. 1. Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Epidemiology and Health Informatics, Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Health Informatics, Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Public Health, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Public Health, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: drlkj52551@korea.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many studies on the relation between maternal health and infant health, including the effect of structured antenatal education, have been published and expanded over the years. AIM: Investigate the impact of various antenatal education programmes on pregnancy outcomes to aid the development of future guidelines related to maternal and foetal health. METHODS: Bibliographic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Korean Studies Information Service System) were searched up to November 2018, following the PICO criteria: population (pregnant women), intervention (antenatal education), comparison (not specified), and outcome (maternal and foetal outcome including physical or mental health components). FINDINGS: We included 23 eligible studies consisting of 14 controlled trials and 9 observational studies. The maternal physical outcomes depending on participation in antenatal education were not significantly different; however, the caesarean birth rate was lower in the antenatal education group (relative risk, RR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.82-0.99), as was the use of epidural anaesthesia (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96). The maternal mental health outcomes of stress and self-efficacy significantly improved in the antenatal education group, although there was no difference in anxiety and depression. The foetal outcomes of birth weight or gestational age at birth were also not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Antenatal education can reduce maternal stress, improve self-efficacy, lower the caesarean birth rate, and decrease the use of epidural anaesthesia; however, there is limited evidence of its effects on maternal or foetal physical outcomes. Therefore, antenatal education should be standardised to elucidate its actual mental and physical health effects.
BACKGROUND: Many studies on the relation between maternal health and infant health, including the effect of structured antenatal education, have been published and expanded over the years. AIM: Investigate the impact of various antenatal education programmes on pregnancy outcomes to aid the development of future guidelines related to maternal and foetal health. METHODS: Bibliographic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Korean Studies Information Service System) were searched up to November 2018, following the PICO criteria: population (pregnant women), intervention (antenatal education), comparison (not specified), and outcome (maternal and foetal outcome including physical or mental health components). FINDINGS: We included 23 eligible studies consisting of 14 controlled trials and 9 observational studies. The maternal physical outcomes depending on participation in antenatal education were not significantly different; however, the caesarean birth rate was lower in the antenatal education group (relative risk, RR, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.82-0.99), as was the use of epidural anaesthesia (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96). The maternal mental health outcomes of stress and self-efficacy significantly improved in the antenatal education group, although there was no difference in anxiety and depression. The foetal outcomes of birth weight or gestational age at birth were also not different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Antenatal education can reduce maternal stress, improve self-efficacy, lower the caesarean birth rate, and decrease the use of epidural anaesthesia; however, there is limited evidence of its effects on maternal or foetal physical outcomes. Therefore, antenatal education should be standardised to elucidate its actual mental and physical health effects.
Authors: Rodrigo M Carrillo-Larco; Kim N Cajachagua-Torres; Wilmer Cristobal Guzman-Vilca; Hugo G Quezada-Pinedo; Carla Tarazona-Meza; Luis Huicho Journal: Lancet Reg Health Am Date: 2021-09