Oleh Andrukhov1, Christian Behm2, Alice Blufstein2, Christian Wehner2, Johannes Gahn2, Benjamin Pippenger3, Raphael Wagner3, Xiaohui Rausch-Fan2. 1. Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: oleh.andrukhov@meduniwien.ac.at. 2. Division of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 3. Straumann Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The impact of the implant surface material and roughness on inflammatory processes in peri-implantitis is not entirely clear. Hence, we investigated how titanium and zirconia surfaces with different roughness influence the susceptibility of primary human gingival fibroblasts to different inflammatory stimuli. METHODS: Primary human gingival fibroblasts were isolated from 8 healthy individuals and cultured on following surfaces: smooth titanium machined surface (TiM), smooth zirconia machined surface (ZrM), moderately rough titanium surface (SLA), or moderately rough zirconia surface (ZLA). Subsequently, stimulation with one of the following stimuli was performed: Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide (LPS), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β. The resulting production of IL-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 was measured by qPCR and ELISA. RESULTS: P. gingivalis LPS induced IL-6 and MCP-1 production was slightly higher on titanium surfaces compared to zirconia surfaces. IL-1β induced IL-6 production was not affected by any surface characteristic. The production of MCP-1 in response to IL-1β was higher on smooth compared to rough surfaces and was not affected by the material. The production of IL-6 and MCP-1 in response to TNF-α was most strongly affected by surface characteristics. Higher production of these cytokine was observed on smooth compared to rough surfaces and on titanium compared to zirconia surfaces. Surface characteristics had only minor effects on IL-8 production. SIGNIFICANCE: The susceptibility of primary gingival fibroblasts to inflammation depends on various factors, such as surface material, surface roughness and the nature of inflammatory stimuli. All these factors might determine susceptibility to peri-implantitis.
OBJECTIVES: The impact of the implant surface material and roughness on inflammatory processes in peri-implantitis is not entirely clear. Hence, we investigated how titanium and zirconia surfaces with different roughness influence the susceptibility of primary human gingival fibroblasts to different inflammatory stimuli. METHODS: Primary human gingival fibroblasts were isolated from 8 healthy individuals and cultured on following surfaces: smooth titanium machined surface (TiM), smooth zirconia machined surface (ZrM), moderately rough titanium surface (SLA), or moderately rough zirconia surface (ZLA). Subsequently, stimulation with one of the following stimuli was performed: Porphyromonas gingivalislipopolysaccharide (LPS), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β. The resulting production of IL-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 was measured by qPCR and ELISA. RESULTS: P. gingivalis LPS induced IL-6 and MCP-1 production was slightly higher on titanium surfaces compared to zirconia surfaces. IL-1β induced IL-6 production was not affected by any surface characteristic. The production of MCP-1 in response to IL-1β was higher on smooth compared to rough surfaces and was not affected by the material. The production of IL-6 and MCP-1 in response to TNF-α was most strongly affected by surface characteristics. Higher production of these cytokine was observed on smooth compared to rough surfaces and on titanium compared to zirconia surfaces. Surface characteristics had only minor effects on IL-8 production. SIGNIFICANCE: The susceptibility of primary gingival fibroblasts to inflammation depends on various factors, such as surface material, surface roughness and the nature of inflammatory stimuli. All these factors might determine susceptibility to peri-implantitis.
Authors: William A Lackington; Lada Fleyshman; Peter Schweizer; Yvonne Elbs-Glatz; Stefanie Guimond; Markus Rottmar Journal: Mater Today Bio Date: 2022-05-22
Authors: Marco Aoqi Rausch; Hassan Shokoohi-Tabrizi; Christian Wehner; Benjamin E Pippenger; Raphael S Wagner; Christian Ulm; Andreas Moritz; Jiang Chen; Oleh Andrukhov Journal: Biology (Basel) Date: 2021-04-22
Authors: Michael Nemec; Christian Behm; Vera Maierhofer; Jonas Gau; Anastasiya Kolba; Erwin Jonke; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Oleh Andrukhov Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: Alice Blufstein; Christian Behm; Barbara Kubin; Johannes Gahn; Andreas Moritz; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan; Oleh Andrukhov Journal: Oral Dis Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 4.068
Authors: Rodrigo A da Silva; Geórgia da Silva Feltran; Marcel Rodrigues Ferreira; Patrícia Fretes Wood; Fabio Bezerra; Willian F Zambuzzi Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-09-13 Impact factor: 3.411