Literature DB >> 32359856

The influence of contralateral breast augmentation on the development of complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Bo Young Park1, Seung Eun Hong1, Min Ki Hong2, Kyong-Je Woo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous contralateral augmentation in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction may increase the risk of skin flap necrosis on the reconstruction side due to increased tension on the skin flap when implants are larger than the original breast size. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the contralateral augmentation procedure affects complications in unilateral DTI breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Patients who underwent immediate unilateral DTI breast reconstruction from January 2013 to July 2017 were included in this study. Data were collected through retrospective review of individual medical records. The primary outcome variable was the development of perioperative complications including skin flap necrosis. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for complications.
RESULTS: A total of 121 patients who underwent unilateral immediate DTI breast reconstruction were included in this study. Twenty-one patients (17.4%) underwent simultaneous contralateral augmentation mammoplasty and 100 patients (82.6%) underwent DTI without contralateral augmentation. Overall complications were not different between the contralateral augmentation and no-augmentation groups (23.8% vs. 31%, respectively, p = 0.512). The frequency of skin flap necrosis in the augmentation group (14.3%) was not significantly different from that in the no-augmentation group (18.0%, p > 0.999). In multivariable analysis, mastectomy weight was the only predictor for complications (p = 0.053) and contralateral augmentation was not associated with development of complications.
CONCLUSION: Contralateral breast augmentation in DTI breast reconstruction is not a risk factor for complications and can be safely performed in selected patients.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; Contralateral augmentation; Implant; One stage

Year:  2020        PMID: 32359856     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

1.  Effects of antihypertensive drugs on surgical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a nationwide population-based claim study.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Hae Yeon Park; Minsu Park; Mi Yang; Goo-Hyun Mun
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-07

2.  Intraoperative Intercostal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Pre-Pectoral versus Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Park; Jeong Hoon Kim; Kyong-Je Woo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Optimizing Symmetry after Unilateral Mastectomy and Reconstruction with a Less Form-stable Prepectoral Implant.

Authors:  Jean-Claude D Schwartz; Michael Binstock
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-12-15

4.  Effect of Orthodontic Combined with Implant Repair on Aesthetic Effect and Gingival Crevicular Fluid Factor in Patients with Dentition Defect and Periodontitis.

Authors:  Min Liu; Zhengmao Xu; Hao Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.246

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.