Literature DB >> 32359322

Influence of bilateral cochlear implants on vocal control.

Abbigail Kirchner1, Torrey M Loucks2, Elizabeth Abbs1, Kevin Shi3, Jeff W Yu3, Justin M Aronoff1.   

Abstract

Receiving a cochlear implant (CI) can improve fundamental frequency (F0) control for deaf individuals, resulting in increased vocal pitch control. However, it is unclear whether using bilateral CIs, which often result in mismatched pitch perception between ears, will counter this benefit. To investigate this, 23 bilateral CI users were asked to produce a sustained vocalization using one CI, the other CI, both CIs, or neither. Additionally, a set of eight normal hearing participants completed the sustained vocalization task as a control group. The results indicated that F0 control is worse with both CIs compared to using the ear that yields the lowest vocal variability. The results also indicated that there was a large range of F0 variability even for the relatively stable portion of the vocalization, spanning from 6 to 46 cents. These results suggest that bilateral CIs can detrimentally affect vocal control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32359322      PMCID: PMC7173977          DOI: 10.1121/10.0001099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

Review 1.  Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters; Marc Moonen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of lung volume on the glottal voice source.

Authors:  J Iwarsson; M Thomasson; J Sundberg
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 4.  Asymmetric Hearing During Development: The Aural Preference Syndrome and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Karen Gordon; Yael Henkin; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Joshua Kuang-Chao Chen; Ann Yi Chiun Chuang; Catherine McMahon; Jen-Chuen Hsieh; Tao-Hsin Tung; Lieber Po-Hung Li
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Links of Prosodic Stress Perception and Musical Activities to Language Skills of Children With Cochlear Implants and Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Ritva Torppa; Andrew Faulkner; Marja Laasonen; Jari Lipsanen; Daniela Sammler
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The effect of lung volume on selected phonatory and articulatory variables.

Authors:  C Dromey; L O Ramig
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Clinically Paired Electrodes Are Often Not Perceived as Pitch Matched.

Authors:  Justin M Aronoff; Monica Padilla; Julia Stelmach; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Benefits of Music Training for Perception of Emotional Speech Prosody in Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Arla Good; Karen A Gordon; Blake C Papsin; Gabe Nespoli; Talar Hopyan; Isabelle Peretz; Frank A Russo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Hongmei Hu; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  1 in total

1.  Adaptation to pitch-altered feedback is independent of one's own voice pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Alexandre Lehmann; Mickael L D Deroche
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.