M J Solomon1,2,3, S Loizides1, S Däster1, K K S Austin1,2, P J Lee1,2. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney Local Health District, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: Reoperative pelvic surgery is rarely hostile and unsafe. Kraske's procedure has historically been used to approach the mid-rectum and to resect retrorectal tumors. However, it provides limited access to the pelvis and is best in the 'virgin' pelvis. We have encountered a select group of patients who required completion proctectomy or resection of a disconnected ileoanal J-pouch where trans-abdominal access to the pelvis was not possible and access to the pelvis could only be safely gained by a prone en bloc sacrectomy. METHOD: We describe a prone approach that provides an alternative route of access to the hostile pelvis. After exposure of the sacrum and coccyx and transection of the sacrum, access to the mesorectal plane is achieved and a proctectomy (or resection of an ileoanal J-pouch) can be completed. The procedure is similar to the Kraske approach but requires a higher and wider exposure similar to the extent of an abdominal resection; however, the operation is performed in 'reverse'. RESULTS: We found that this approach was feasible and safe in the previously operated, hostile pelvis. We employed it in one patient to excise a disconnected J-pouch with chronic sepsis and in another patient for a completion proctectomy. Both patients had an uneventful recovery and clear margins were obtained with no complications. CONCLUSION: The en bloc prone sacrectomy approach is a useful alternative in a very select group of patients with difficult trans-abdominal access to the pelvis. Experience in pelvic surgery and identification of clear anatomical landmarks is paramount to avoid catastrophic uncontrollable bleeding. Colorectal Disease
AIM: Reoperative pelvic surgery is rarely hostile and unsafe. Kraske's procedure has historically been used to approach the mid-rectum and to resect retrorectal tumors. However, it provides limited access to the pelvis and is best in the 'virgin' pelvis. We have encountered a select group of patients who required completion proctectomy or resection of a disconnected ileoanal J-pouch where trans-abdominal access to the pelvis was not possible and access to the pelvis could only be safely gained by a prone en bloc sacrectomy. METHOD: We describe a prone approach that provides an alternative route of access to the hostile pelvis. After exposure of the sacrum and coccyx and transection of the sacrum, access to the mesorectal plane is achieved and a proctectomy (or resection of an ileoanal J-pouch) can be completed. The procedure is similar to the Kraske approach but requires a higher and wider exposure similar to the extent of an abdominal resection; however, the operation is performed in 'reverse'. RESULTS: We found that this approach was feasible and safe in the previously operated, hostile pelvis. We employed it in one patient to excise a disconnected J-pouch with chronic sepsis and in another patient for a completion proctectomy. Both patients had an uneventful recovery and clear margins were obtained with no complications. CONCLUSION: The en bloc prone sacrectomy approach is a useful alternative in a very select group of patients with difficult trans-abdominal access to the pelvis. Experience in pelvic surgery and identification of clear anatomical landmarks is paramount to avoid catastrophic uncontrollable bleeding. Colorectal Disease