| Literature DB >> 32359133 |
Dawei Tang1, Junhua Bao1, Gang Bai1, Miaomiao Hao1, Rui Jin1, Fang Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estrogen has an important role in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA). Polymorphisms of the ESR1 gene and the ESR2 gene have been identified as risk factors for URSA, but with varied associations in Chinese populations. This study aimed to compare the role of gene polymorphisms of ESR1 and ESR2 and the risk of URSA in the Chinese Hui and Chinese Han populations. MATERIAL AND METHODS Chinese Hui women (n=171) and Chinese Han women (n=234) with URSA were compared with healthy controls (n=417) matched by ethnicity and age. Genotyping was performed using direct sequencing and identified three polymorphisms of the ESR1 gene (rs9340799, rs2234693, and rs3798759) and three polymorphisms of the ESR2 gene (rs207764, rs4986938, and rs1256049). The association between ESR1 and ESR2 gene polymorphisms and the risk of URSA was evaluated statistically using the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS No association was detected between the allelic, dominant, and recessive models of ESR1 and ESR2 gene polymorphisms and the risk of URSA in Chinese Han and Hui populations (p>0.05). The distribution of the AGT haplotype containing ESR2 gene polymorphisms rs2077647A, rs4986938G, and rs1256049T was significantly reduced in patients with URSA compared with controls in the Chinese Hui population (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14-0.62; p=0.0009; padj=0.005). CONCLUSIONS The AGT haplotype of the ESR2 gene containing the polymorphism rs2077647A, rs4986938G, and rs1256049T (ESR2 hapAGT) was a protective factor for URSA in women in the Chinese Hui population when compared with the Chinese Han population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32359133 PMCID: PMC7212806 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.921102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Characteristics of Chinese Han and Chinese Hui women with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) and the controls.
| Chinese Han (n=234) | Control (n=240) | P-value | Chinese Hui (n=171) | Control (n=177) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year, mean±SD) | 28.0±4.3 | 30.16±4.1 | 0.052 | 29.06±4.46 | 30.55±3.56 | 0.076 |
| Menarche (year, mean±SD) | 14.2±1.2 | 14.7±1.4 | 0.131 | 13.38±1.98 | 13.98±2.14 | 0.152 |
| Smoking (%) | 26.1 | 23.1 | 0.247 | 17.4 | 15.6 | 0.315 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.5±1.4 | 26.3±2.2 | 0.566 | 26.6±1.6 | 27.1±1.8 | 0.547 |
| T4 (ng/dL) | 1.2±0.36 | 1.2±0.31 | 0.423 | 1.2±0.44 | 1.2±0.41 | 0.416 |
| TSH (mU/mL) | 2.0±0.24 | 2.0±0.31 | 0.475 | 2.0±0.42 | 2.0±0.38 | 0.517 |
| Miscarriages (%) | ||||||
| 3 | 227 | 164 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||
| 5 | 2 | 1 |
URSA – unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion; SD – standard deviation; BMI – body mass index; TSH – thyroid stimulating hormone; T – thyroid.
The patterns of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the ESR1 and ESR2 genes in Chinese Han and Chinese Hui women with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA).
| Chinese Hui women (171/177) | Chinese Han women (234/240) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESR1 | ||||||
| rs9340799 | 0.236 | 0.018 | rs9340799 | 0.294 | 0.027 | |
| rs2234693 | – | 0.016 | rs2234693 | – | 0.021 | |
| ESR2 | ||||||
| rs2077647 | 0.003 | 0.053 | rs2077647 | 0.005 | 0.068 | |
| rs4986938 | – | 0.004 | rs4986938 | – | 0.028 | |
Distribution of the ESR1 and ESR2 gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Chinese Han and Chinese Hui women with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) and the controls.
| Gene | Ethnicity | SNP ID | Position | Minor allele | MAF (frequency) | P-value | P-value (corrected) | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case | Control | ||||||||
| ESR1 | Hui | rs9340799 | 6: 151842246 | G | 0.281 | 0.192 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 1.91 (1.02–3.59) |
| rs2234693 | 6: 151842200 | C | 0.439 | 0.458 | 0.61 | – | 0.93 (0.55–1.55) | ||
| rs3798759 | 6: 151959418 | C | 0.246 | 0.279 | 0.32 | – | 1.46 (0.82–2.59) | ||
| Han | rs9340799 | 6: 151842246 | G | 0.256 | 0.254 | 0.94 | – | 1.23 (0.73–2.07) | |
| rs2234693 | 6: 151842200 | C | 0.389 | 0.419 | 0.35 | – | 0.92 (0.58–1.43) | ||
| rs3798759 | 6: 151959418 | C | 0.295 | 0.275 | 0.49 | – | 0.71 (0.56–1.48) | ||
| ESR2 | Hui | rs2077647 | 14: 151807942 | G | 0.377 | 0.390 | 0.72 | – | 1.05 (0.62–1.79) |
| rs4986938 | 14: 64233098 | T | 0.213 | 0.163 | 0.09 | – | 1.61 (0.80–3.23) | ||
| rs1256049 | 14: 64257333 | T | 0.219 | 0.279 | 0.07 | – | 1.69 (0.94–3.04) | ||
| Han | rs2077647 | 14: 151807942 | G | 0.356 | 0.331 | 0.42 | – | 0.93 (0.59–1.47) | |
| rs4986938 | 14: 64233098 | T | 0.267 | 0.287 | 0.49 | – | 0.78 (0.45–1.36) | ||
| rs1256049 | 14: 64257333 | T | 0.376 | 0.364 | 0.70 | – | 1.15 (0.73–1.79) | ||
SNP – single nucleotide polymorphism; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; NC – not calculated; MAF – minor allele frequency.
The Bonferroni’s correction was performed to correct the P-value;
OR and 95% CI are calculated for the minor allele of each SNP.
The frequency of ESR1 and ESR2 genotypes in the Chinese Han and Chinese Hui women with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) and the controls.
| Gene | Ethnicity | SNPs, rs, (A>B) | Genotypes | OR [95% CI], P(Add model) AA/BB | P | OR [95% CI], P(Dom model) AA+AB/BB | P(adj) | OR [95% CI], P(Rec model) AA/AB+BB | P(adj) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case (AA/AB/BB) | Control (AA/AB/BB) | |||||||||
| ESR1 | Hui (171/177) | rs9340799G | 87/72/12 | 116/54/7 | 2.83 [0.48–16.48], – | – | 0.46 [0.08–2.64], – | – | 2.19 [1.03–4.70], 0.04 | 0.12 |
| rs2234693C | 51/90/30 | 51/90/36 | 0.83 [0.28–2.44], 0.74 | – | 1.20 [0.47–3.05], 0.69 | – | 0.95 [0.43–2.12], 0.92 | – | ||
| rs3798759C | 96/66/9 | 88/79/10 | 0.42 [0.096–1.85], – | – | 2.03 [0.48–8.57], – | – | 0.66 [0.32–1.37], 0.26 | – | ||
| Han (234/240) | rs9340799G | 135/78/21 | 128/92/20 | 0.93 [0.32–2.70], 0.89 | – | 1.29 [0.46–3.64], 0.64 | – | 1.52 [0.79–2.91], 0.20 | – | |
| rs2234693C | 90/102/42 | 87/105/48 | 0.85 [0.35–2.03], 0.71 | – | 1.14 [0.52–2.53], 0.74 | – | 0.91 [0.48–1.73], 0.78 | – | ||
| rs3798759C | 117/96/21 | 126/96/18 | 1.25 [0.38–4.06], 0.69 | – | 0.82 [0.26–2.56], 0.74 | – | 1.11 [0.59–2.06], 0.75 | – | ||
| ESR2 | Hui (171/177) | rs2077647C | 58/93/20 | 63/90/24 | 0.79 [0.23–2.67], 0.69 | – | 1.33 [0.43–4.12], 0.62 | – | 1.02 [0.48–2.19], 1.00 | |
| rs4986938T | 110/49/12 | 135/36/6 | 2.37 [0.41–13.65], – | – | 0.46 [0.08–2.64], – | – | 1.61 [0.71–3.63], 0.25 | |||
| rs1256049T | 102/63/6 | 88/79/10 | 0.31 [0.05–1.70], – | – | 2.55 [0.47–13.69], – | – | 0.53 [0.25–1.11], 0.09 | |||
| Han (234/240) | rs2077647C | 102/95/35 | 114/93/33 | 1.06 [0.47–2.37], 0.89 | – | 1.04 [0.49–2.21], 0.92 | – | 1.17 [0.62–2.19], 0.62 | ||
| rs4986938T | 131/81/22 | 128/86/26 | 0.7 2[0.28–1.85], 0.49 | – | 1.35 [0.54–3.41], 0.52 | – | 0.79 [0.39–1.62], 0.53 | |||
| rs1256049T | 85/122/27 | 92/121/27 | 0.78 [0.26–2.37], 0.66 | – | 0.97 [0.36–2.59], 1.00 | – | 0.69 [0.34–1.42], 0.32 | |||
SNP – single nucleotide polymorphism; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; NC – not calculated; MAF – minor allele frequency.
The Bonfferoni correction was applied to correct the P-value.
Distribution of the haplotypes (>1%) in the ESR1 and ESR2 genes in the Chinese Han and Chinese Hui women with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) and the controls.
| Gene | Haplotype | Ethnicity | Case (freq.) | Control (freq.) | P | P-value (corrected) | OR [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESR1 | CCA | Hui | 0.151 | 0.158 | 0.88 | – | 0.95 [0.46–1.93] |
| Han | 0.201 | 0.133 | 0.12 | – | 1.61 [0.88–2.95] | ||
| CTA | Hui | 0.034 | 0.01 | 0.24 | – | 3.11 [0.42–22.85] | |
| Han | 0.015 | 0.025 | – | – | – | ||
| TCA | Hui | 0.156 | 0.218 | 0.23 | – | 0.67 [0.34–1.29] | |
| Han | 0.099 | 0.159 | 0.10 | – | 0.57 [0.29–1.13] | ||
| TCC | Hui | 0.035 | 0.081 | 0.14 | – | 0.42 [0.13–1.37] | |
| Han | 0.056 | 0.07 | 0.59 | – | 0.78 [0.31–1.95] | ||
| TTA | Hui | 0.413 | 0.291 | 0.05 | – | 1.72 [0.99–2.96] | |
| Han | 0.390 | 0.408 | 0.67 | – | 0.91 [0.58–1.43] | ||
| TTC | Hui | 0.114 | 0.241 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.41 [0.19–0.83] | |
| Han | 0.198 | 0.145 | 0.23 | – | 1.43 [0.79–2.59] | ||
| ESR2 | AAC | Hui | 0.095 | 0.082 | 0.72 | – | 1.83 [0.47–2.94] |
| Han | 0.113 | 0.108 | 0.87 | – | 1.06 [0.52–2.14] | ||
| AGC | Hui | 0.384 | 0.260 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 1.79 [1.03–3.15] | |
| Han | 0.249 | 0.216 | 0.48 | – | 1.21 [0.72–2.04] | ||
| AGT | Hui | 0.098 | 0.269 | 0.0009 | 0.005 | 0.29 [0.14–0.62] | |
| Han | 0.227 | 0.257 | 0.52 | – | 0.85 [0.51–1.42] | ||
| GAC | Hui | 0.043 | 0.040 | 0.91 | – | 1.08 [0.29–3.91] | |
| Han | 0.018 | 0.031 | 0.45 | – | 0.57 [0.13–2.53] | ||
| GGC | Hui | 0.259 | 0.296 | 0.54 | – | 0.83 [0.47–1.49] | |
| Han | 0.210 | 0.202 | 0.87 | – | 1.05 [0.61–1.81] | ||
| GGT | Hui | 0.057 | 0.040 | 0.54 | – | 1.46 [0.43–4.94] | |
| Han | 0.135 | 0.106 | 0.42 | – | 1.32 [0.67–2.61] |
OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; ‘–‘ – not significant.
The PLINK genome association online analysis tool was used to estimate common (frequency >0.01) haplotypes constructed by the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ESR1 (rs9340799, rs2234693, rs3798759) and ESR2 (rs2077647, rs4986938, rs1256049);
each haplotype was compared with the other haplotypes combined;
the Bonfferoni correction was applied to correct the P-value.