Literature DB >> 32359127

Examining the self-reported advantages and disadvantages of socially networking about body image and eating disorders.

Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg1, Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft1, Melissa J Krauss1, Nnenna Anako1,2, Christine Xu1,2, Erin Kasson1, Shaina J Costello1, Denise E Wilfley1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to understand the self-reported advantages and disadvantages of socially networking about body image/eating disorders (EDs) and to examine the openness of these participants to online outreach and support for ED symptoms.
METHOD: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a sample of N = 598. Eligible participants were ≥15 years old, English-speaking, and U.S. residents who endorsed posting or following thin-ideal/body-image content on social media. Quantitative measures were used to assess online peer support and online interaction preferences, and to identify ED symptoms. Deductive and inductive qualitative approaches were used to analyze open-ended items about the advantages and disadvantages of social networking about thin-ideal content on social media platforms (SMPs).
RESULTS: Among those who posted about the thin-ideal on social media, 70% felt that the peer responses were positive and supportive. Participants generally favored online interaction, and a third stated that they would accept support from someone they did not know online (38%). The most common advantages noted for posting/following thin-ideal content on SMPs were motivation/encouragement to engage in a certain behavior, socializing, and information giving/seeking. The most common disadvantages mentioned for posting/following thin-ideal content on SMPs were that the content elicits negative/bad feelings, having to deal with the negative consequences/reactions of others when socially networking about this topic, and that it triggers a desire to engage in ED behaviors. DISCUSSION: With these findings, researchers, health practitioners, and social media administrators can devise ways to reduce harmful consequences of posting/following body-image/ED content on social media.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body image; eating disorders; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32359127      PMCID: PMC8135099          DOI: 10.1002/eat.23282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  25 in total

Review 1.  The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; W F Velicer
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

2.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  A pilot evaluation of a social media literacy intervention to reduce risk factors for eating disorders.

Authors:  Siân A McLean; Eleanor H Wertheim; Jennifer Masters; Susan J Paxton
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  Negative eating attitudes and behaviors among adolescents: The role of parental control and perceived peer support.

Authors:  Ugo Pace; Giulio D'Urso; Carla Zappulla
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 5.  A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Holland; Marika Tiggemann
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2016-03-18

6.  Examining an elaborated sociocultural model of disordered eating among college women: the roles of social comparison and body surveillance.

Authors:  Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Anna M Bardone-Cone; Cynthia M Bulik; Stephen A Wonderlich; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2014-08-20

7.  Beyond Traditional Newspaper Advertisement: Leveraging Facebook-Targeted Advertisement to Recruit Long-Term Smokers for Research.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; Rebecca Bartlett Ellis; Adam Warrick; Susan Rawl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 8.  The Egosyntonic Nature of Anorexia: An Impediment to Recovery in Anorexia Nervosa Treatment.

Authors:  Eva C Gregertsen; William Mandy; Lucy Serpell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-22

9.  Pro-ana versus Pro-recovery: A Content Analytic Comparison of Social Media Users' Communication about Eating Disorders on Twitter and Tumblr.

Authors:  Dawn B Branley; Judith Covey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-11

10.  Facebook as an effective recruitment strategy for mental health research of hard to reach populations.

Authors:  Rony Kayrouz; Blake F Dear; Eyal Karin; Nickolai Titov
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2016-01-06
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Xuejing Li; Meiqi Meng; Junqiang Zhao; Xiaoyan Zhang; Dan Yang; Jiaxin Fang; Junxin Wang; Liu Han; Yufang Hao
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  Users' perceptions of how an unmoderated eating disorder community may benefit or harm their recovery.

Authors:  Maegan E Jones; Elizabeth H Blodgett Salafia; Kerrie C Leonard
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-08-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.