Akshara R Balachandra1, Erik Kaestner1, Naeim Bahrami1, Anny Reyes1, Sanam Lalani1, Anna Christina Macari1, Brianna M Paul1, Leonardo Bonilha1, Carrie R McDonald2. 1. From the Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics (A.R.B., E.K., N.B., A.R., A.C.M., C.R.M.) and Department of Psychiatry (C.R.M.), University of California, San Diego; San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology (A.R., C.R.M.); Department of Neurology (S.L., B.M.P.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and Boston University School of Medicine (A.R.B.), MA. 2. From the Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics (A.R.B., E.K., N.B., A.R., A.C.M., C.R.M.) and Department of Psychiatry (C.R.M.), University of California, San Diego; San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology (A.R., C.R.M.); Department of Neurology (S.L., B.M.P.), University of California, San Francisco; Department of Neurology (L.B.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; and Boston University School of Medicine (A.R.B.), MA. camcdonald@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive power of white matter neuronal networks (i.e., structural connectomes [SCs]) in discriminating memory-impaired patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) from those with normal memory. METHODS: T1- and diffusion MRI (dMRI), clinical variables, and neuropsychological measures of verbal memory were available for 81 patients with TLE. Prediction of memory impairment was performed with a tree-based classifier (XGBoost) for 4 models: (1) a clinical model including demographic and clinical features, (2) a hippocampal volume (HCV) model, (3) a tract model including 5 temporal lobe white matter association tracts derived from a dMRI atlas, and (4) an SC model based on dMRI. SCs were derived by extracting cortical-cortical connections from a temporal lobe subnetwork with probabilistic tractography. Principal component (PC) analysis was then applied to reduce the dimensionality of the SC, yielding 10 PCs. Multimodal models were also tested combining SCs and tracts with HCV. Each model was trained on 48 patients from 1 epilepsy center and tested on 33 patients from a different center. RESULTS: Multimodal models that included the SC + HCV model yielded the highest classification accuracy (81%; 0.90 sensitivity; 0.67 specificity), outperforming the clinical model (61%; p < 0.001) and HCV model (66%; p < 0.001). In addition, the unimodal SC model (76% accuracy) and tract model (73% accuracy) outperformed the clinical model (p < 0.001) and HCV model (p < 0.001) for classifying patients with TLE with and without memory impairment. Furthermore, the SC identified that short-range temporal-temporal connections were important contributors to memory performance. CONCLUSION: SCs and tract-based models are stronger predictors of memory impairment in TLE than HCVs and clinical variables. However, SCs may provide additional information about local cortical-cortical connectivity contributing to memory that is not captured in large association tracts.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive power of white matter neuronal networks (i.e., structural connectomes [SCs]) in discriminating memory-impaired patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) from those with normal memory. METHODS: T1- and diffusion MRI (dMRI), clinical variables, and neuropsychological measures of verbal memory were available for 81 patients with TLE. Prediction of memory impairment was performed with a tree-based classifier (XGBoost) for 4 models: (1) a clinical model including demographic and clinical features, (2) a hippocampal volume (HCV) model, (3) a tract model including 5 temporal lobe white matter association tracts derived from a dMRI atlas, and (4) an SC model based on dMRI. SCs were derived by extracting cortical-cortical connections from a temporal lobe subnetwork with probabilistic tractography. Principal component (PC) analysis was then applied to reduce the dimensionality of the SC, yielding 10 PCs. Multimodal models were also tested combining SCs and tracts with HCV. Each model was trained on 48 patients from 1 epilepsy center and tested on 33 patients from a different center. RESULTS: Multimodal models that included the SC + HCV model yielded the highest classification accuracy (81%; 0.90 sensitivity; 0.67 specificity), outperforming the clinical model (61%; p < 0.001) and HCV model (66%; p < 0.001). In addition, the unimodal SC model (76% accuracy) and tract model (73% accuracy) outperformed the clinical model (p < 0.001) and HCV model (p < 0.001) for classifying patients with TLE with and without memory impairment. Furthermore, the SC identified that short-range temporal-temporal connections were important contributors to memory performance. CONCLUSION: SCs and tract-based models are stronger predictors of memory impairment in TLE than HCVs and clinical variables. However, SCs may provide additional information about local cortical-cortical connectivity contributing to memory that is not captured in large association tracts.
Authors: Bruce Hermann; Michael Seidenberg; Brian Bell; Paul Rutecki; Raj D Sheth; Gary Wendt; Daniel O'Leary; Vince Magnotta Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Jeffrey D Riley; David L Franklin; Vicky Choi; Ronald C Kim; Devin K Binder; Steven C Cramer; Jack J Lin Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2010-02-03 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: C R McDonald; M E Ahmadi; D J Hagler; E S Tecoma; V J Iragui; L Gharapetian; A M Dale; E Halgren Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Emily C Edmonds; Joel Eppig; Mark W Bondi; Kelly M Leyden; Bailey Goodwin; Lisa Delano-Wood; Carrie R McDonald Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Raul Rodriguez-Cruces; Jessica Royer; Sara Larivière; Dani S Bassett; Lorenzo Caciagli; Boris C Bernhardt Journal: Netw Neurosci Date: 2022-06-01