Jie Zang1,2, Qingxing Liu1,2, Huimin Sui1,2, Rongxi Wang1,2, Orit Jacobson3, Xinrong Fan4, Zhaohui Zhu1,2, Xiaoyuan Chen5. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Diagnosis and Therapy in Nuclear Medicine, Beijing, China. 3. Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and. 4. Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. 5. Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and pumcfxr@126.com chen9647@gmail.com 13611093752@163.com.
Abstract
This study was designed to assess the safety and therapeutic response to 177Lu-labeled Evans blue-modified prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 617 (EB-PSMA-617) treatment with escalating doses in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: With institutional review board approval and informed consent, patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: group A (n = 10) was treated with a 1.18 ± 0.09 GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA. Group B (n = 10) was treated with a 2.12 ± 0.19 GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA. Group C (n = 8) was treated with a 3.52 ± 0.58 GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA. Eligible patients received up to 3 cycles of 177Lu-EB-PSMA therapy, at 8-wk intervals. Results: Because of disease progression or bone marrow suppression, 4 of 10, 5 of 10, and 5 of 8 patients completed 3 cycles of therapy as planned in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The prostate-specific antigen response was correlated with treatment dose, and the prostate-specific antigen disease control rates were higher in groups B (70%) and C (75%) than in group A (10%) (P = 0.007), but no correlation between groups B and C was found. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed a response in all treatment groups; however, there was no significant difference among the 3 groups. A hematologic toxicity study found that platelets decreased more in groups B and C than in group A and that grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 (25.0%) patients in group C. No serious nephritic or hepatic side effects were observed. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a 2.12-GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA seems to be safe and adequate in tumor treatment. Further investigations with an increased number of patients are warranted.
This study was designed to assess the safety and therapeutic response to 177Lu-labeled Evans blue-modified prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 617 (EB-PSMA-617) treatment with escalating doses in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: With institutional review board approval and informed consent, patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: group A (n = 10) was treated with a 1.18 ± 0.09 GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA. Group B (n = 10) was treated with a 2.12 ± 0.19 GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA. Group C (n = 8) was treated with a 3.52 ± 0.58 GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA. Eligible patients received up to 3 cycles of 177Lu-EB-PSMA therapy, at 8-wk intervals. Results: Because of disease progression or bone marrow suppression, 4 of 10, 5 of 10, and 5 of 8 patients completed 3 cycles of therapy as planned in groups A, B, and C, respectively. The prostate-specific antigen response was correlated with treatment dose, and the prostate-specific antigen disease control rates were higher in groups B (70%) and C (75%) than in group A (10%) (P = 0.007), but no correlation between groups B and C was found. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed a response in all treatment groups; however, there was no significant difference among the 3 groups. A hematologic toxicity study found that platelets decreased more in groups B and C than in group A and that grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 (25.0%) patients in group C. No serious nephritic or hepatic side effects were observed. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a 2.12-GBq dose of 177Lu-EB-PSMA seems to be safe and adequate in tumor treatment. Further investigations with an increased number of patients are warranted.
Authors: Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Walter M Stadler; Celestia Higano; Ethan Basch; Karim Fizazi; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Tomasz M Beer; Michael A Carducci; Kim N Chi; Paul G Corn; Johann S de Bono; Robert Dreicer; Daniel J George; Elisabeth I Heath; Maha Hussain; Wm Kevin Kelly; Glenn Liu; Christopher Logothetis; David Nanus; Mark N Stein; Dana E Rathkopf; Susan F Slovin; Charles J Ryan; Oliver Sartor; Eric J Small; Matthew Raymond Smith; Cora N Sternberg; Mary-Ellen Taplin; George Wilding; Peter S Nelson; Lawrence H Schwartz; Susan Halabi; Philip W Kantoff; Andrew J Armstrong Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Axel Bräuer; Lena Sophie Grubert; Wolfgang Roll; Andres Jan Schrader; Michael Schäfers; Martin Bögemann; Kambiz Rahbar Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Shawn M Hillier; Ashley M Kern; Kevin P Maresca; John C Marquis; William C Eckelman; John L Joyal; John W Babich Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Kambiz Rahbar; Stefan Kürpig; Martin Bögemann; Michael Claesener; Elisabeth Eppard; Florian Gärtner; Sebastian Rogenhofer; Michael Schäfers; Markus Essler Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 3.138