| Literature DB >> 32357436 |
Kacper Nijakowski1, Anna Walerczyk-Sas2, Anna Surdacka1.
Abstract
Tooth erosion is becoming an increasingly common dental problem among teenagers. The study aimed to determine risk factors for erosive lesions in young sports professionals. Participants were 155 students-102 physically active and 53 controls. The method included dental examination (including Basic Erosive Wear Examination) and a questionnaire concerning sports activity, dietary and hygienic habits. The sporting activity significantly correlated with erosive lesions (RSpearman = 0.344). The regression model incorporating the kind of sports activity, special diet and (non-)drinking water was statistically significant (p = 0.922 for the Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and strong enough to predict erosive lesions in young athletes (AUC = 0.758). Water sports professionals were almost 14 times more likely to suffer from erosive lesions than control students. Drinking water as the main beverage decreased the odds by about 70%. The graphical interpretation of multidimensional correspondence analysis confirms the predictive value of these factors. The kind of sports activity adjusted by the main beverage and a special diet was the best variable to predict erosive lesions among teenagers. Early proper diagnosis with defined risk factors leads to better prevention and successful treatment.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; erosive lesion; physical activity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32357436 PMCID: PMC7246606 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Erosive lesions on labial surfaces of central incisors (personal collection).
Figure 2Erosive lesions on palatal surfaces of incisors and canines (personal collection).
Distribution of students by type of sport.
| Female | Male | All | |
|---|---|---|---|
| team sports | 28 | 30 | 58 |
| fighting sports | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| water sports | 7 | 14 | 21 |
| individual sports | 12 | 3 | 15 |
| control group | 35 | 18 | 53 |
| 83 | 72 | 155 |
Selected potential risk factors for erosive lesions.
| BEWE > 0 [%] | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| kind of sports activity | team sports | 51.72 |
|
| fighting sports | 50.00 | ||
| water sports | 80.95 | ||
| individual sports | 60.00 | ||
| control group | 22.64 | ||
| main beverage | water | 41.67 | 0.070 |
| isotonic drinks | 80.95 |
| |
| fruit juices | 45.33 | 0.103 | |
| carbonated drinks | 53.85 | 0.732 | |
| tendency to hold the drink in the mouth | 57.14 | 0.136 | |
| brushing method | horizontal | 50.00 | 0.401 |
| circular | 45.21 | ||
| sweeping | 20.00 | ||
| gastric disorders | 77.78 | 0.052 | |
| gender | female | 37.35 |
|
| male | 56.94 | ||
Bold for statistical significance p-value <0.05, according to the Pearson’s Chi2 test.
Parameters of predictors incorporated into the logistic regression model.
| β | SE | Wald Stat. | Odds Ratio | Confidence OR -95% | Confidence OR 95% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| intercept | −0.616 | 0.388 | 2.520 | 0.112 | 0.540 | 0.252 | 1.155 |
| team sports | 1.418 | 0.462 | 9.423 |
| 4.129 | 1.670 | 10.209 |
| individual sports | 1.908 | 0.655 | 8.489 |
| 6.736 | 1.867 | 24.306 |
| fighting sports | 1.329 | 0.824 | 2.604 | 0.107 | 3.778 | 0.752 | 18.982 |
| water sports | 2.636 | 0.682 | 14.921 |
| 13.957 | 3.664 | 53.171 |
| special diet: 1 | 1.326 | 0.719 | 3.400 | 0.065 | 3.766 | 0.920 | 15.415 |
| water: 1 | −1.160 | 0.420 | 7.633 |
| 0.314 | 0.138 | 0.714 |
Bold for statistical significance p-value <0.05.
Figure 3V-fold cross validation—learning ROC curves. Blue solid line—training curve, blue dashed line—test curve, red line—reference line.
Figure 4Plot for multidimensional correspondence analysis.
Figure 5Multidimensional correspondence analysis—3-dimensional plot.
Figure 6Multidimensional correspondence analysis—2-dimensional plot.
Multidimensional correspondence analysis—parameters of determined points.
| x | y | z | Quality | Relative Inertia | x | y | z | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inertia | cos^2 | Inertia | cos^2 | Inertia | cos^2 | ||||||
| team sports | −0.166 | 0.801 | −0.467 | 0.530 | 0.104 | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.207 | 0.383 | 0.082 | 0.131 |
| individual sports | −0.553 | 0.259 | −0.090 | 0.041 | 0.151 | 0.021 | 0.033 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| fighting sports | −0.111 | 0.539 | 4.211 | 0.982 | 0.158 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.013 | 0.016 | 0.915 | 0.965 |
| water sports | −1.503 | −0.669 | −0.068 | 0.425 | 0.144 | 0.219 | 0.354 | 0.052 | 0.070 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| control group | 0.950 | −0.766 | −0.072 | 0.777 | 0.110 | 0.221 | 0.469 | 0.173 | 0.305 | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| BEWE: 0 | 0.792 | 0.074 | 0.000 | 0.729 | 0.077 | 0.240 | 0.723 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| BEWE: 1 | −0.913 | −0.086 | −0.000 | 0.729 | 0.089 | 0.277 | 0.723 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| water: 0 | −0.212 | −1.204 | −0.000 | 0.651 | 0.116 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.379 | 0.631 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| water: 1 | 0.092 | 0.524 | 0.000 | 0.651 | 0.051 | 0.004 | 0.020 | 0.165 | 0.631 | 0.000 | 0.000 |