Literature DB >> 32357323

Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Spinal Cord Injury (TRACK-SCI): an overview of initial enrollment and demographics.

Rachel E Tsolinas1, John F Burke1,2, Anthony M DiGiorgio1,2, Leigh H Thomas1,2,3, Xuan Duong-Fernandez1,2,3, Mark H Harris1,2,3, John K Yue1,2, Ethan A Winkler1,2, Catherine G Suen1,2, Lisa U Pascual4,5, Adam R Ferguson1,2,3,6, J Russell Huie1,2,3, Jonathan Z Pan1,7, Debra D Hemmerle1,2,3, Vineeta Singh1,3,8, Abel Torres-Espin1,2, Cleopa Omondi1,2,3, Nikos Kyritsis1,2,3, Jenny Haefeli1,2, Philip R Weinstein2,3,9, Carlos A de Almeida Neto1,2,3, Yu-Hung Kuo10, Derek Taggard10, Jason F Talbott1,11, William D Whetstone12, Geoffrey T Manley1,2, Jacqueline C Bresnahan1,2,3, Michael S Beattie1,2,3, Sanjay S Dhall1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a dreaded condition that can lead to paralysis and severe disability. With few treatment options available for patients who have suffered from SCI, it is important to develop prospective databases to standardize data collection in order to develop new therapeutic approaches and guidelines. Here, the authors present an overview of their multicenter, prospective, observational patient registry, Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in SCI (TRACK-SCI).
METHODS: Data were collected using the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) common data elements (CDEs). Highly granular clinical information, in addition to standardized imaging, biospecimen, and follow-up data, were included in the registry. Surgical approaches were determined by the surgeon treating each patient; however, they were carefully documented and compared within and across study sites. Follow-up visits were scheduled for 6 and 12 months after injury.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in the TRACK-SCI study. In this overview, basic clinical, imaging, neurological severity, and follow-up data on these patients are presented. Overall, 78.8% of the patients were determined to be surgical candidates and underwent spinal decompression and/or stabilization. Follow-up rates to date at 6 and 12 months are 45% and 36.3%, respectively. Overall resources required for clinical research coordination are also discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors established the feasibility of SCI CDE implementation in a multicenter, prospective observational study. Through the application of standardized SCI CDEs and expansion of future multicenter collaborations, they hope to advance SCI research and improve treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AIS = ASIA Impairment Scale; ASIA = American Spinal Injury Association; BASIC = Brain and Spinal Injury Center; CDE = common data element; CMS = Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; CRC = clinical research coordinator; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; IRB = institutional review board; ISCI = International Spinal Cord Injury; ISCoS = International Spinal Cord Society; ISNCSCI = International Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury; ISS = Injury Severity Score; LAR = legally authorized representative; NINDS = National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; REDCap = Research Electronic Data Capture; SCI; SCI = spinal cord injury; TBI = traumatic brain injury; TRACK-SCI = Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in SCI; UCSF = University of California San Francisco; ZSFGH = Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital; data registries; spine trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32357323     DOI: 10.3171/2020.2.FOCUS191030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  5 in total

1.  Appendicular Fracture and Polytrauma Correlate with Outcome of Spinal Cord Injury: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Spinal Cord Injury Study.

Authors:  Theodore A Miclau; Abel Torres-Espin; Saam Morshed; Kazuhito Morioka; J Russell Huie; Ashraf N El Naga; Austin Chou; Lisa Pascual; Xuan Duong-Fernandez; Yu-Hung Kuo; Philip Weinstein; Sanjay S Dhall; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Michael S Beattie; Anthony Digiorgio; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.869

2.  Diagnostic blood RNA profiles for human acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Nikos Kyritsis; Abel Torres-Espín; Patrick G Schupp; J Russell Huie; Austin Chou; Xuan Duong-Fernandez; Leigh H Thomas; Rachel E Tsolinas; Debra D Hemmerle; Lisa U Pascual; Vineeta Singh; Jonathan Z Pan; Jason F Talbott; William D Whetstone; John F Burke; Anthony M DiGiorgio; Philip R Weinstein; Geoffrey T Manley; Sanjay S Dhall; Adam R Ferguson; Michael C Oldham; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Michael S Beattie
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 14.307

3.  Expert-augmented automated machine learning optimizes hemodynamic predictors of spinal cord injury outcome.

Authors:  Austin Chou; Abel Torres-Espin; Nikos Kyritsis; J Russell Huie; Sarah Khatry; Jeremy Funk; Jennifer Hay; Andrew Lofgreen; Rajiv Shah; Chandler McCann; Lisa U Pascual; Edilberto Amorim; Philip R Weinstein; Geoffrey T Manley; Sanjay S Dhall; Jonathan Z Pan; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Michael S Beattie; William D Whetstone; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fighting for recovery on multiple fronts: The past, present, and future of clinical trials for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Valerie A Dietz; Nolan Roberts; Katelyn Knox; Sherilynne Moore; Michael Pitonak; Chris Barr; Jesus Centeno; Scott Leininger; Kent C New; Peter Nowell; Matthew Rodreick; Cedric G Geoffroy; Argyrios Stampas; Jennifer N Dulin
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 6.147

5.  Factors related to improved American Spinal Injury Association grade of acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ci Tian; Yang Lv; Shu Li; Dai-Dai Wang; Yi Bai; Fang Zhou; Qing-Bian Ma
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.