Literature DB >> 32357261

Bacterial contamination and septic transfusion reaction rates associated with platelet components before and after introduction of primary culture: experience at a US Academic Medical Center 1991 through 2017.

Sirisha Kundrapu1, Swati Srivastava1, Caryn E Good1, Hillard M Lazarus2, Robert W Maitta1, Michael R Jacobs1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high incidence of septic transfusion reactions (STRs) led to testing being mandated by AABB from 2004. This was implemented by primary culture of single-donor apheresis platelets (APs) from 2004 and prestorage pooled platelets (PSPPs) from 2007. STUDY DESIGN/
METHODS: Platelet (PLT) aliquots were cultured at issue and transfusion reactions evaluated at our hospital. Bacterial contamination and STR rates (shown as rates per million transfusions in Results) were evaluated before and after introduction of primary culture by blood centers that used a microbial detection system (BacT/ALERT, bioMerieux) or enhanced bacterial detection system (eBDS, Haemonetics).
RESULTS: A total of 28,457 PLTs were cultured during pre-primary culture periods (44.7% APs; 55.3% at-issue pooled PLTs [AIPPs]) and 97,595 during post-primary culture periods (79.3% APs; 20.7% PSPPs). Forty-three contaminated units were identified in preculture and 34 in postculture periods (rates, 1511 vs. 348; p < 0.0001). Contamination rates of APs were significantly lower than AIPPs in the preculture (393 vs. 2415; p < 0.0001) but not postculture period compared to PSPPs (387 vs. 198; p = 0.9). STR rates (79 vs. 90; p = 0.98) were unchanged with APs but decreased considerably with pooled PLTs (826 vs. 50; p = 0.0006). Contamination (299 vs. 324; p = 0.84) and STR rates (25 vs. 116; p = 0.22) were similar for PLTs tested by BacT/ALERT and eBDS primary culture methods. A change in donor skin preparation method in 2012 was associated with decreased contamination and STR rates.
CONCLUSION: Primary culture significantly reduced bacterial contamination and STR associated with pooled but not AP PLTs. Measures such as secondary testing near time of use or pathogen reduction are needed to further reduce STRs.
© 2020 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32357261     DOI: 10.1111/trf.15780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  5 in total

1.  Pathogen reduction of blood bank components: a matter of swings and roundabouts.

Authors:  Albert Farrugia; Vincenzo De Angelis
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Acquired platelet storage container leaks and contamination with environmental bacteria: A preventable cause of bacterial sepsis.

Authors:  Richard R Gammon; Rita A Reik; Marc Stern; Ralph R Vassallo; Dan A Waxman; Pampee P Young; Richard J Benjamin
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Expanded validation of the effect and quality of a pathogen inactivation system based on riboflavin photochemistry on platelet bacterial contamination.

Authors:  Bin Fan; Meng Yi; Guang Yang; Lu Yang; Wei Shang; Yi Liu; Xiaolong Zhong; Liguo Zhu; Deqing Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

4.  Performance profile of an updated safety measure rapid assay for bacteria in platelets.

Authors:  Remo P Vallejo; Lisa Shinefeld; David LaVerda; Nancy Best; Gregory Lawrence; Adam Lousararian; Nancy Hornbaker; Patricia Rasmusson; Paul D Mintz
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Evaluation of an improved rapid bacterial assay with untreated and pathogen-reduced platelets: Detection of Acinetobacter strains.

Authors:  David LaVerda; Lisa Shinefeld; Nancy Best; Johny Lisitu; Gary Tambolleo; Yli Remo Vallejo
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.337

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.