BACKGROUND: The unfavourable safety profile of aminoglycosides and the synergistic effects observed in vitro have prompted the development of novel dual β-lactam therapies, e.g. ampicillin/ceftriaxone or ampicillin/ceftaroline, for the treatment of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis. OBJECTIVES: For comparison with in vitro chequerboard assay results, a partial chequerboard setup of ampicillin/gentamicin, ampicillin/ceftriaxone and ampicillin/ceftaroline against E. faecalis was established in the Galleria mellonella larval infection model. METHODS: Discrimination of synergistic and additive interactions was based on the evaluation of larval survival, bacterial quantity in the haemolymph and a pathology score index (internal to the workgroup). Single and multiple dosing schemes based on the half-life of ampicillin were applied. Pharmacokinetic data of the antibiotics in the larvae were determined via agar plate diffusion assays. RESULTS: Ampicillin and ceftriaxone exhibited strain-specific synergistic interactions in the larvae under both dosing regimens, while the other two combinations showed additive effects. Ampicillin/ceftaroline was inferior to ampicillin/ ceftriaxone. Not all synergistic effects observed in vitro could be replicated in the larvae. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest superior efficacy of ampicillin/ceftriaxone for the treatment of high-inoculum enterococcal infections, for at least some strains, but question the benefit of the current standard of adding the nephrotoxic gentamicin compared with the safer ceftriaxone. This is the first study to develop a scheme for differentiation between additive and synergistic effects in larvae and apply a multiple-antibiotic dosing scheme based on the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin. The model allows the analysis of synergistic effects of antimicrobials in an in vivo setting, but the clinical correlation warrants further study.
BACKGROUND: The unfavourable safety profile of aminoglycosides and the synergistic effects observed in vitro have prompted the development of novel dual β-lactam therapies, e.g. ampicillin/ceftriaxone or ampicillin/ceftaroline, for the treatment of Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis. OBJECTIVES: For comparison with in vitro chequerboard assay results, a partial chequerboard setup of ampicillin/gentamicin, ampicillin/ceftriaxone and ampicillin/ceftaroline against E. faecalis was established in the Galleria mellonella larval infection model. METHODS: Discrimination of synergistic and additive interactions was based on the evaluation of larval survival, bacterial quantity in the haemolymph and a pathology score index (internal to the workgroup). Single and multiple dosing schemes based on the half-life of ampicillin were applied. Pharmacokinetic data of the antibiotics in the larvae were determined via agar plate diffusion assays. RESULTS:Ampicillin and ceftriaxone exhibited strain-specific synergistic interactions in the larvae under both dosing regimens, while the other two combinations showed additive effects. Ampicillin/ceftaroline was inferior to ampicillin/ ceftriaxone. Not all synergistic effects observed in vitro could be replicated in the larvae. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest superior efficacy of ampicillin/ceftriaxone for the treatment of high-inoculum enterococcal infections, for at least some strains, but question the benefit of the current standard of adding the nephrotoxicgentamicin compared with the safer ceftriaxone. This is the first study to develop a scheme for differentiation between additive and synergistic effects in larvae and apply a multiple-antibiotic dosing scheme based on the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin. The model allows the analysis of synergistic effects of antimicrobials in an in vivo setting, but the clinical correlation warrants further study.