| Literature DB >> 32356889 |
Miguel A Redondo1, Anna Berlin1, Johanna Boberg1, Jonàs Oliva2,3.
Abstract
Predicting fungal community assembly is partly limited by our understanding of the factors driving the composition of deposited spores. We studied the relative contribution of vegetation, geographical distance, seasonality and weather to fungal spore deposition across three vegetation types. Active and passive spore traps were established in agricultural fields, deciduous forests and coniferous forests across a geographic gradient of ∼600 km. Active traps captured the spore community suspended in air, reflecting the potential deposition, whereas passive traps reflected realized deposition. Fungal species were identified by metabarcoding of the ITS2 region. The composition of spore communities captured by passive traps differed more between vegetation types than across regions separated by >100 km, indicating that vegetation type was the strongest driver of composition of deposited spores. By contrast, vegetation contributed less to potential deposition, which followed a seasonal pattern. Within the same site, the spore communities captured by active traps differed from those captured by passive traps. Realized deposition tended to be dominated by spores of species related to vegetation. Temperature was negatively correlated with the fungal species richness of both potential and realized deposition. Our results indicate that vegetation may be able to maintain similar fungal communities across distances, and likely be the driving factor of fungal spore deposition at landscape level. © FEMS 2020.Entities:
Keywords: community assembly; dispersal limitations; fungal communities; high-throughput sequencing; spore traps
Year: 2020 PMID: 32356889 PMCID: PMC7239601 DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEMS Microbiol Ecol ISSN: 0168-6496 Impact factor: 4.194
Figure 1.(A) Distribution of sampling sites in southern Sweden. (B) Types of spore traps placed in each type of vegetation. The arrows indicate the possible pairwise comparisons between types of vegetation for the common spore traps.
Figure 2.Ordination plots of a principal coordinate analysis of the spore communities collected by (A) passive spore traps and (B) active spore traps. The 95% confidence ellipse is shown for each group. The R2 and P-values are based on a PERMANOVA analysis performed with the adonis2 function in R.
Figure 3.Comparison of relative abundances of fungal classes between vegetation types collected by (A) passive traps and (B) active traps. Bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Different letters or asterisks indicate significant differences after applying the Bonferroni correction (corrected P-value = 0.0012).
Figure 4.Ordination plots of a principal coordinate analysis and Venn diagrams of the spore communities collected in (A, B) agricultural fields and (C, D) deciduous forests by active and passive spore traps. The 95% confidence ellipse for each group is shown. The R2 values are based on a PERMANOVA analysis performed with the adonis2 function in R. Numbers in Venn diagrams display the number of species for each type of spore trap.
Figure 5.Correlation between species richness (rarefied) and temperature (A–C), and between dominance of pathogens and temperature (D–F) for each type of spore trap and vegetation type. In panels (A–C), each dot corresponds to a sample. In panels (D–F), each dot corresponds to the averaged dominance of pathogens for each month of the survey. Blue dots and solid lines correspond to deciduous forests. White dots and dashed lines correspond to agricultural fields. Gray dots and dotted lines correspond to coniferous forests.