Synne Garder Pedersen1,2, Oddgeir Friborg3, Guri Anita Heiberg1,4, Cathrine Arntzen1,2, Henriette Holm Stabel5, Gyrd Thrane2, Jørgen Feldbæk Nielsen5, Audny Anke1,4,6. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 2. Department of Health and Care Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 3. Department of Psychology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway. 5. Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research Clinic, Aarhus University, Denmark, Denmark. 6. Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Model and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare stroke-specific health related quality of life in two country-regions with organisational differences in subacute rehabilitation services, and to reveal whether organisational factors or individual factors impact outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre study with one-year follow-up of 369 first-ever stroke survivors with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, recruited from stroke units in North Norway (n = 208) and Central Denmark (n = 161). The 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale was the primary outcome-measure. RESULTS: The Norwegian participants were older than the Danish (Mage= 69.8 vs. 66.7 years, respectively), had higher initial stroke severity, and longer stroke unit stays. Both cohorts reported more problems with cognitive, social, and emotional functioning compared to physical functioning. Two scale components were revealed. Between-country differences in the cognitive-social-mental component showed slightly better function in the Norwegian participants. Depression, anxiety, pre-stroke dependency, initial stroke severity, and older age were substantially associated to scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Successful improvements in one-year functioning in both country-regions may result from optimising long-term rehabilitation services to address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke could be explained by individual factors, such as pre-stroke dependency and mental health, rather than differences in the organisation of subacute rehabilitation services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe stroke-specific health related quality of life (SS-QOL) assessment tool captures multidimensional effects of a stroke from the perspective of the patient, which is clinically important information for the rehabilitation services.The cognitive-social-mental component and the physical health component, indicate specific functional problems which may vary across and within countries and regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services.For persons with mild to moderate stroke, longer-term functional improvements may be better optimised if the rehabilitation services particularly address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning.
PURPOSE: To compare stroke-specific health related quality of life in two country-regions with organisational differences in subacute rehabilitation services, and to reveal whether organisational factors or individual factors impact outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective multicentre study with one-year follow-up of 369 first-ever stroke survivors with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, recruited from stroke units in North Norway (n = 208) and Central Denmark (n = 161). The 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale was the primary outcome-measure. RESULTS: The Norwegian participants were older than the Danish (Mage= 69.8 vs. 66.7 years, respectively), had higher initial stroke severity, and longer stroke unit stays. Both cohorts reported more problems with cognitive, social, and emotional functioning compared to physical functioning. Two scale components were revealed. Between-country differences in the cognitive-social-mental component showed slightly better function in the Norwegian participants. Depression, anxiety, pre-stroke dependency, initial stroke severity, and older age were substantially associated to scale scores. CONCLUSIONS: Successful improvements in one-year functioning in both country-regions may result from optimising long-term rehabilitation services to address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke could be explained by individual factors, such as pre-stroke dependency and mental health, rather than differences in the organisation of subacute rehabilitation services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe stroke-specific health related quality of life (SS-QOL) assessment tool captures multidimensional effects of a stroke from the perspective of the patient, which is clinically important information for the rehabilitation services.The cognitive-social-mental component and the physical health component, indicate specific functional problems which may vary across and within countries and regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services.For persons with mild to moderate stroke, longer-term functional improvements may be better optimised if the rehabilitation services particularly address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning.
Entities:
Keywords:
Stroke; Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale; countries; health-related quality of life (HRQOL); rehabilitation services
Authors: Stephen C L Lau; Stephanie Judycki; Mikayla Mix; Olivia DePaul; Rachel Tomazin; Angela Hardi; Alex W K Wong; Carolyn Baum Journal: Am J Occup Ther Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Natasa K Rancic; Milan N Mandic; Biljana N Kocic; Dejan R Veljkovic; Ilija D Kocic; Suzana A Otasevic Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 2.430