Literature DB >> 32356313

The Impact of Extended Half-Life Factor Concentrates on Prophylaxis for Severe Hemophilia in The United States.

Lynn M Malec1,2, Dunlei Cheng3, Char M Witmer4, Julie Jaffray5, Peter A Kouides6, Kristina M Haley7, Robert F Sidonio8, Kelsey Johnson1, Michael Recht3,7, Gilbert White1,2, Stacy E Croteau9, Margaret V Ragni10,11.   

Abstract

With licensure of extended half-life (EHL) factor products and the changing landscape of available hemophilia products, patients and providers have options for less treatment-intense prophylaxis. The impact of these products in clinical practice to date remains understudied. We aimed to quantify the use of EHL products in prophylaxis in the US using the ATHNdataset, a database of 145 ATHN-affiliated hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs). Further, we aimed to quantify the impact of EHL on key hemophilia indicators including annualized bleed rates (ABRs), hemophilia joint health scores (HJHS) and quality of life (QOL) metrics. The use of EHL versus SHL products severe hemophilia was compared between June 2018 and March 2019 using the ATHNdataset. A cohort of patients was also recruited from 7 participating HTCs in order to compare ABR, HJHS and QOL between product classes. By March 2019 the number of individuals with SHA receiving EHLs remained relatively stable (28.4%) whereas the number prescribed non-factor products increased to 7.1%, with a diminishing majority of patients (64.0%) continuing to receive SHLs. The majority of patients with SHB received treatment with EHLs including 57.5%. There was a trend toward lower ABR with use of EHLs in SHA and SHB, although this did not result in improved HJHS nor QOL. EHL use in the United States in severe hemophilia continues to increase, although at a slower rate in SHA with the availability of non-factor therapy. The impact of the EHL therapies in clinical practice should continue to be examined prospectively. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32356313     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  4 in total

1.  Resource utilization and treatment costs of patients with severe hemophilia A: Real-world data from the ATHNdataset.

Authors:  Michael Recht; Chunla He; Er Chen; Dunlei Cheng; Paul Solari; David Hinds
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2022-03-27

2.  Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe hemophilia B in the United States: Results from the CHESS US and CHESS US+ population surveys.

Authors:  Tom Burke; Sohaib Asghar; Jamie O'Hara; Eileen K Sawyer; Nanxin Li
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe haemophilia B in adults receiving factor IX prophylaxis: findings from the CHESS II real-world burden of illness study in Europe.

Authors:  Tom Burke; Sohaib Asghar; Jamie O'Hara; Margaret Chuang; Eileen K Sawyer; Nanxin Li
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.123

4.  The Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 Validation in Adult Patients Study: A multicenter international study.

Authors:  Jean St-Louis; Audrey Abad; Sharon Funk; Merlyn Tilak; Stephen Classey; Nichan Zourikian; Paul McLaughlin; Sébastien Lobet; Grace Hernandez; Stacie Akins; Anna J Wells; Marilyn Manco-Johnson; Judy John; Steve Austin; Pratima Chowdhary; Cedric Hermans; Diane Nugent; Nihal Bakeer; Sarah Mangles; Pamela Hilliard; Victor S Blanchette; Brian M Feldman
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-03-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.