Literature DB >> 32356122

Evaluation of callus formation in distal femur fractures after carbon fiber composite versus stainless steel plate fixation.

Seong-Eun Byun1, David R Vintimilla1, Yehia H Bedeir2, Chase S Dean1, Joshua A Parry3, David J Hak4, Cyril Mauffrey1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR) composite plates have a more favorable stress modulus than stainless steel (SS) plates that may confer an advantage to bridge plating. The purpose of this study was to compare callus formation after CFR and SS plating of distal femur fractures.
METHODS: A retrospective review identified distal femoral fractures treated with CFR (n = 10) and SS (n = 21) plate fixation. Callus formation was measured using the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibia (mRUST) at 3- and 6-month follow-up by three orthopedic trauma surgeons. Loss of alignment, implant failure, and revision surgeries were reviewed.
RESULTS: At 3 months, the mRUST in the CFR and SS groups was 9.0 (range, 6.3-12.3) and 6.9 (range, 4.3-11.7), respectively (p = 0.01). At 6 months, the mRUST in the CFR and SS groups was 11.4 (range, 7.7-16.0) and 10.5 (range, 6.0-15.7), respectively (p = 0.3). CFR and SS groups had a loss of fracture alignment in 1 (10%) and 1 (5%) patient, respectively (p = 0.5), and an unplanned revision surgery in 0 (0%) and 3 (15%) patients, respectively (p = 0.2). All three revisions surgeries in the SS group were for nonunion repair.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of distal femur fractures with CFR versus SS plating resulted in greater callus formation at 3 months. At 6 months, there was no difference in callus formation between groups. A larger series of patients is necessary to determine if the observed early increased callus formation confers a benefit to clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bridge plating; Callus; Carbon fiber plates; Distal femoral fractures; Secondary bone healing; Stainless steel plates; Union

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32356122     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02681-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  5 in total

1.  Response to letter: Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kanthan Theivendran; Faizan Arshad; Umar-Khetaab Hanif; Aleksi Reito; Xavier Griffin; Clary J Foote
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-01-29

Review 2.  Carbon fibre reinforced PEEK versus traditional metallic implants for orthopaedic trauma surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kanthan Theivendran; Faizan Arshad; Umar-Khetaab Hanif; Aleksi Reito; Xavier Griffin; Clary J Foote
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-28

3.  Fracture fixation in extremity trauma with carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) plates: evidence today.

Authors:  George D Chloros; Apostolos D Prodromidis; Jo Wilson; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Experimental testing of fracture fixation plates: A review.

Authors:  Shiling Zhang; Dharmesh Patel; Mark Brady; Sherri Gambill; Kanthan Theivendran; Subodh Deshmukh; John Swadener; Sarah Junaid; Laura Jane Leslie
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  [Clinical application of lower extremity axial distractor in closed reduction and retrograde intramedullary nail fixation of distal femoral fractures].

Authors:  Nan Zhou; Mingliang Ma; Hongzhi Liu; Dongyang Zhao; Zhigang Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.