| Literature DB >> 32355825 |
Ran Luo1, Yi Yang1, Yi-Chun Cheng1, Dan Chang1, Ting-Ting Liu1, Yue-Qiang Li1, Wei Dai1, Mei-Ying Zuo1, Yu-Lin Xu1, Chun-Xiu Zhang1, Shu-Wang Ge1, Gang Xu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few non-invasive biomarkers that have been identified to improve the risk stratification of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). CXCL16 has been shown to play a key role as a chemoattractant, adhesion, and fibrosis factor in inflammatory disease. This study evaluated the potential for CXCL16 plasma as a potential biomarker in patients with IgAN.Entities:
Keywords: CXCL16; IgA nephropathy (IgAN); inflammation cells; polymorphisms; prognosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32355825 PMCID: PMC7186753 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
The demographic and clinical parameters of the patients with IgAN (N=230)
| Parameters | Results |
|---|---|
| Age (years; mean ± SD) | 34.5±9.7 |
| Gender (female/male) | 139/91 |
| MAP (mmHg; mean ± SD) | 98.6±14.9 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 93 (40.4) |
| Microscopic hematuria, n (%) | 221 (96.1) |
| Gross hematuria, n (%) | 32 (13.9) |
| Albumin (g/L; mean ± SD) | 39.3±5.3 |
| Serum creatinine (μmol/L; median, IQR) | 80.0, 63.0–109.8 |
| eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2; median, IQR) | 93.2, 63.3–116.6 |
| 24-h urine protein (g/d; median, IQR) | 0.84, 0.40–1.74 |
| CXCL16 (ng/mL; mean ± SD) | 2.89±0.82 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, median (25th percentile–75th percentile), or number (percentage). MAP, mean arterial pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range. eGFR was calculated with the CKD-EPI equation. 24-h urine protein was missing in 10% of cases.
Figure 1The correlations between the plasma CXCL16 levels and Scr (A), eGFR (B), albumin (C), and 24-h urine protein (D) in univariate analysis.
Correlations between the levels of plasma CXCL16 and other clinical parameters in the patients with IgAN in univariate analysis and multivariate analysis (N=230)
| Parameters | Univariate linear regression | Multivariate linear regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r value | P value | β | P value | ||
| ALB(g/L) | −0.218 | 0.001 | −0.020 | 0.200 | |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 0.367 | <0.001 | −0.004 | 0.099 | |
| UA (mmol/L) | 0.277 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.013 | |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 0.246 | 0.002 | 0.047 | 0.172 | |
| eGFR (mL/min per 1.73 m2) | −0.411 | <0.001 | −0.008 | 0.018 | |
| 24-h urine protein (g/d) | 0.232 | 0.001 | 0.015 | 0.669 | |
| K(mmol/L) | 0.209 | 0.002 | 0.133 | 0.445 | |
| Ca(mmol/L) | −0.144 | 0.031 | −0.187 | 0.687 | |
eGFR was calculated with the CKD-EPI equation. 24-h urine protein was missing in 10% of cases.
Correlations between plasma CXCL16 levels and the Oxford Classification in IgAN patients: univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis (N=230)
| Univariate linear regression | Multivariate linear regression* | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level of CXCL16 (ng/mL; median, IQR) | P | β (s.e.m.) | P | ||
| Mesangial hypercellularity | <0.001 | 0.127 (0.145) | 0.382 | ||
| Score ≤0.5 | 2.58, 2.22–3.05 | ||||
| Score >0.5 | 2.96, 2.40–3.53 | ||||
| Endocapillary hypercellularity | 0.638 | −0.113 (0.190) | 0.552 | ||
| Absent | 2.75, 2.30–3.35 | ||||
| Present | 3.02, 2.32–3.50 | ||||
| Segmental glomerulosclerosis | 0.313 | −0.153 (0.143) | 0.288 | ||
| Absent | 2.75, 2.28–3.15 | ||||
| Present | 2.78, 2.32–3.47 | ||||
| Tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis | <0.001 | 0.233 (0.101) | 0.023 | ||
| 0–25% | 2.52, 2.12–3.03 | ||||
| 26–50% | 2.85, 2.47–3.51 | ||||
| >50% | 3.24, 2.68–3.89 | ||||
| Crescents | 0.018 | 0.183 (0.101) | 0.070 | ||
| 0 | 2.728, 2.267–3.262 | ||||
| 1–25% | 2.720, 2.300–3.402 | ||||
| >25% | 3.320, 2.768–3.953 | ||||
*Multivariate model: multivariate with the 5 pathologic features (mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary hypercellularity, segmental glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, crescents) plus age, gender, mean arterial pressure, and 24-h urine protein.
Figure 2The renal IHC staining of CXCL16 in high and low levels of plasma CXCL16 (magnification ×200, scale bar =80 µm).
Figure 3The IHC staining of CD8+ T cells (A), CD4+ T cells (B), CD20+ B cells (C) and CD68+ macrophage (D) in high and low levels of plasma CXCL16 (magnification ×400, scale bar =40 µm).
Figure 4Kaplan-Meier curve of overall patient survival according to plasma CXCL16 level category. Patient survival was significantly better for the low CXCL16 group than for the high CXCL16 group (log-rank test, P=0.005).
Association between plasma CXCL16 levels and renal outcome in IgAN patients
| Multivariate Cox regression analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | P value | |
| Age | 1.029 | 0.971–1.090 | 0.333 |
| Gender | 0.537 | 0.189–1.530 | 0.244 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 1.002 | 0.967–1.039 | 0.898 |
| 24-h Urine protein | 1.188 | 1.032–1.367 | 0.016 |
| CXCL16 (ng/mL) | 1.873 | 1.012–3.468 | 0.046 |
HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. Renal outcome was defined as a 50% reduction in eGFR and ESRD.
Associations between CXCL16 polymorphisms and clinical parameters
| Polymorphism | Genotype | N | CXCL16, ng/mL | Scr, umol/L | eGFR, ml/min per 1.73m2 | 24-h urine protein, g/d | Combine-event |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2304973 | CC | 191 | 2.869±0.820 | 90.85±43.21 | 89.78±29.85 | 1.506±2.077 | 13 (6.81%) |
| CT | 30 | 2.987±0.787 | 100.60±40.39 | 84.40±35.75 | 1.612±1.620 | 3 (10.0%) | |
| rs2250333 | CC | 109 | 2.806±0.744 | 93.97±39.27 | 87.04±30.10 | 1.475±2.183 | 6 (5.5%) |
| CT | 99 | 2.954±0.862 | 94.01±55.46 | 90.12±31.23 | 1.549±1.831 | 9 (9.1%) | |
| TT | 14 | 3.029±1.010 | 85.69±45.11 | 97.64±31.89 | 1.673±2.112 | 1 (7.1%) | |
| rs1050998 | CC | 79 | 2.892±0.807 | 96.75±41.96 | 84.98±30.08 | 1.812±2.540 | 5 (6.3%) |
| CT | 107 | 2.856±0.839 | 92.79±53.59 | 91.73±31.44 | 1.429±1.728 | 10 (9.3%) | |
| TT | 35 | 2.960±0.774 | 88.34±38.56 | 90.01±29.54 | 1.226±1.608 | 1 (2.9%) | |
| rs3744700 | GG | 174 | 2.927±0.855 | 94.43±50.20 | 89.05±30.94 | 1.694±2.205 | 13 (7.5%) |
| GT | 41 | 2.773±0.657 | 90.32±35.68 | 88.46±30.03 | 1.011±1.010 | 3 (7.3%) | |
| TT | 6 | 2.438±0.317 | 88.50±35.97 | 92.97±32.78 | 0.462±0.376 | 0 (0.0%) | |
| rs2234358 | GG | 97 | 2.909±0.752 | 94.27±47.50 | 88.49±31.16 | 1.323±1.494 | 9 (9.3%) |
| GT | 99 | 2.921±0.927 | 97.25±50.62 | 86.24±30.84 | 1.642±2.339 | 5 (5.1%) | |
| TT | 25 | 2.650±0.511 | 75.68±26.68 | 102.30±25.41 | 1.830±2.422 | 2 (8.0%) | |
| rs1876444 | CC | 80 | 2.899±0.805 | 96.40±41.81 | 85.39±30.11 | 1.790±2.525 | 5 (6.3%) |
| CT | 108 | 2.871±0.862 | 93.18±53.33 | 90.95±31.48 | 1.448±1.727 | 10 (9.3%) | |
| TT | 34 | 2.964±0.786 | 88.35±39.14 | 90.49±29.84 | 1.226±1.608 | 1 (2.9%) | |
| rs8123 | AA | 98 | 2.794±0.746 | 95.58±41.21 | 86.03±29.63 | 1.629±2.289 | 8 (8.1%) |
| AC | 108 | 2.954±0.889 | 91.77±52.79 | 91.77±31.20 | 1.455±1.784 | 7 (6.5%) | |
| CC | 15 | 3.110±0.874 | 90.67±45.21 | 90.25±32.22 | 1.467±1.926 | 1 (6.7%) | |
| rs2277680 | AA | 77 | 2.873±0.786 | 96.35±42.36 | 85.53±30.11 | 1.846±2.575 | 5 (6.5%) |
| AG | 111 | 2.883±0.877 | 93.3±52.76 | 90.38±31.23 | 1.429±1.704 | 10 (9.0%) | |
| GG | 34 | 2.987±0.770 | 88.35±39.14 | 91.53±30.65 | 1.213±1.614 | 1 (2.9%) | |
| rs1051009 | CC | 43 | 2.967±0.778 | 97.63±61.10 | 89.75±33.90 | 1.413±1.750 | 2 (4.6%) |
| CT | 121 | 2.913±0.871 | 91.22±43.56 | 90.16±30.06 | 1.363±1.614 | 10 (8.3%) | |
| TT | 58 | 2.806±0.775 | 95.57±43.63 | 85.55±29.91 | 2.018±2.881 | 2 (3.4%) |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, or number (percentage).