Literature DB >> 32355824

The genetic association between type 2 diabetic and hepatocellular carcinomas.

Zhan Shi1, Zunqiang Xiao1, Linjun Hu2, Yuling Gao3, Junjun Zhao4, Yang Liu2, Guoliang Shen5, Qiuran Xu6, Dongsheng Huang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are both major health problems throughout the world. It has been reported that T2DM is an independent risk factor for HCC, although the pathophysiology is still unclear.
METHODS: In order to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in T2DM and HCC, gene expression datasets for T2DM (GSE15653), HCC (GSE60502) and metformin-treated cells (GSE69850) were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database repository. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks for the DEGs were constructed and gene clusters selected for functional enrichment analysis. Ten genes with the highest degree of connectivity were selected as hub genes and prognostic analysis together with analysis of gene expression and protein distribution were performed for these genes. Lastly, we investigated associations between the hub genes and genes associated with metformin treatment in hepatocarcinoma cells.
RESULTS: In total, 256 common DEGs, including 155 up-regulated genes and 101 down-regulated genes, were identified. Enrichment analyses showed that the genes of the major module were largely associated with the cell cycle. All of the 10 hub genes (CCNA2, CCNB1, MAD2L1, BU1B, RACGAP1, CHEK1, BUB1, ASPM, NCAPG and TTK) have a strong association with lower overall survival in liver cancer patients and four genes (CCNA2, CCNB1, CHEK1 and BUB1) have reduced expression in metformin-treated samples.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a number of genes that may play important roles in the association of T2DM and HCC, including four genes which may be the target of metformin treatment for diabetes and HCC. The specific mechanisms involved remain to be identified. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metformin; Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); differentially expressed gene; hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355824      PMCID: PMC7186634          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Globally, liver cancers rank seventh for cancer incidence while their mortality ranks fourth among all types of cancer (1). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor originating from hepatocytes and it is the most common cancer in the liver. Chronic viral hepatitis and alcoholism are the two main causes of HCC. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is also recognized as an important risk factor for HCC due to the increasing prevalence of obesity and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (2). T2DM is a disease of the endocrine system and is common, with one T2DM patient per every 11 adults (3). Recently, there have been a number of reports researches showing that T2DM has a negative influence on the survival of HCC patients (4,5). Metformin is frequently used to treat hyperglycemia associated with T2DM and has also been reported to have anti-hepatocellular carcinoma effects (6). However, most of these studies have focused on epidemiology with only a few concentrating on possible genetic connections between HCC and T2DM. We, therefore, undertook this study to explore the specific mechanism of the association between T2DM and HCC. We analyzed the gene expression profiles of T2DM and HCC tissue to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in both diseases, followed by the construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks for genes observed to be up-regulated or down-regulated in both T2DM and HCC. After construction of the PPI network, a gene cluster would be selected for functional enrichment analyses. Ten genes with the highest degree of connectivity were selected as hub genes. Prognostic analysis, gene expression analysis and protein distribution analysis were performed on the hub genes. We also investigated associations between the hub genes and genes implicated in metformin treatment for HCC. Lastly, we discuss our results in relation to published findings in an attempt to elucidate the relationship between T2DM and HCC.

Methods

Microarray data

In order to avoid errors caused by platform differences, the datasets containing T2DM samples and HCC samples should use the same platform. Two gene expression datasets GSE15653 (GPL96; T2DM) and GSE60502 (GPL96; HCC) were chosen from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) database repository. In addition, the dataset GSE69850 (GPL13667), a HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cell dataset which contains metformin-treated samples, was also downloaded from the GEO ().
Table 1

Description of data used in this study

AccessionPlatformNormal/controlCancer/treatType
GSE15653GPL965 normal4 diabetesLiver tissues
GSE60502GPL9618 normal18 cancerHCC tissues
GSE69850GPL1366739 control9 Metformin treatedHepG2 cells

HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

Identification of DEGs

We used GRO2R (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/), a web tool that allows users to identify DEGs between two or more groups of samples in a GEO series, analyze gene expression in GSE15653 and GSE60502. |logFC| ≥1.0 and P<0.05 were the criteria used for gene selection as DEGs and statistical significance, respectively. Genes showing up-regulation or down-regulation in both T2DM and HCC were investigated by Venn diagram, using the Venn diagram web tool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/).

PPI network construction

We used STRING (https://string-db.org), a database of known and predicted protein-protein interactions, to construct the PPI network for genes that were up-regulated or down-regulated in both T2DM and HCC. Interactions with a score >0.7 were considered statistically significant. We visualized the PPI networks by Cytoscape, an open-source software platform for visualizing molecular interaction networks and biological pathways. Ten genes with the highest degree of connectivity were selected as hub genes. The MCODE plugin in Cytoscape was used to find clusters with the degree cut-off, haircut on, k-core, node score cut-off, max depth set as 10, 0.2, 2, 0.2 and 100 in PPI network. Modules with the highest scores were selected for functional enrichment analyses.

Functional enrichment analyses for module genes

The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) is a database resource for understanding high-level functions of biological systems from molecular-level information. The Gene Ontology (GO) resource can be used to perform enrichment analysis. We used DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) for both KEGG pathway and GO enrichment analysis, including Biological Process, Cellular Component and Molecular Function for the selected module genes.

Analysis of hub genes

To identify the prognostic values of the hub genes, we used Kaplan-Meier Plotter database (https://kmplot.com) to construct Kaplan-Meier survival plots for 10 hub genes. GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn), a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analysis, was used to analyze the expression of hub genes in HCC and normal tissue and to verify the prognostic values of hub genes in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Lastly, the Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org) was used to analyze the protein distribution of hub genes in HCC and normal liver tissue.

Analysis of genes associated with metformin treatment

Unpaired t-tests were used in GraphPad Prism to analyze the expression of 10 hub genes in GSE69850, which contains nine samples of HepG2 hepatocarcinoma cells treated with metformin and 39 control samples treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), in order to determine associations between the hub genes and metformin treatment for HCC. Results with P<0.05 were considered statistically significant ().
Figure 1

Graphical abstract.

Graphical abstract.

Results

Identification of DEGs in HCC and T2DM

In total, 2,462 DGEs were identified from four T2DM samples and five control samples in dataset GSE15653 and 1,760 DGEs were identified from 18 HCC samples and 18 adjacent non-tumorous liver samples in dataset GSE60502. Then, 256 genes were found to overlap between the T2DM and HCC DGEs, including 155 up-regulated genes and 101 down-regulated genes ().
Figure 2

Differentially expressed genes among diabetes DEGs and HCC DEGs. DEGs1 represents the genes that up-regulated in both diabetes and HCC. DEGs2 represents the genes that down-regulated in both diabetes and HCC. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

Differentially expressed genes among diabetes DEGs and HCC DEGs. DEGs1 represents the genes that up-regulated in both diabetes and HCC. DEGs2 represents the genes that down-regulated in both diabetes and HCC. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma. PPI network maps yielded 223 nodes and 531 edges, indicating the interactions between the 256 overlapping genes. The ten hub genes with the highest degree of connectivity were CCNA2, CCNB1, MAD2L1, BUB1B, RACGAP1, CHEK1, BUB1, ASPM, NCAPG, TTK (, ). We use the MCODE plugin in Cytoscape to analyze the PPI networks and choose the module which has a highest score to create a cluster network including 31 nodes and 433 edges ().
Figure 3

PPI network construction and module analysis on the DEGs1 and DEGs2. (A) PPI network on the DEGs1 and DEGs2, the red, orange and yellow nodes represent hub genes; (B) the chosen module which has a highest score using MCODE. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; PPI, protein-protein interaction.

Table 2

Top 10 hub genes

RankName
1 CCNA2
2 CCNB1
3 MAD2L1
3 BUB1B
3 RACGAP1
6 CHEK1
7 BUB1
7 ASPM
9 NCAPG
9 TTK
PPI network construction and module analysis on the DEGs1 and DEGs2. (A) PPI network on the DEGs1 and DEGs2, the red, orange and yellow nodes represent hub genes; (B) the chosen module which has a highest score using MCODE. DEGs, differentially expressed genes; PPI, protein-protein interaction. We used DAVID to make functional enrichment analyses for the 31 module genes selected by MCODE. The major biological processes identified for these genes are “mitotic sister chromatid segregation” and “mitotic cell cycle phase transition” (). Cellular component analysis indicated that these genes are mainly enriched in “spindle” and “nuclear chromosome part” (). In terms of molecular function, these genes are mainly associated with “microtubule-binding” and “tubulin-binding” (). Lastly, through KEGG pathway analysis, we observed that these genes are mostly enriched in “cell cycle” () ().
Figure 4

Functional enrichment analysis for module genes. (A,B,C,D) Represent the results of biological process, cellular component, molecular function and KEGG pathway analyses for module genes.

Table 3

KEGG pathway analysis

TermP valueGenes
Cell cycle2.30E-15 CCNA2; CCNB1; CCNE2; CHEK1; BUB1B; MCM4; TTK; CDC25C; BUB1; MAD2L1
DNA replication2.69E-07 FEN1; PRIM1; POLE2; MCM4
Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation4.12E-07 CCNA2; CCNB1; CDC25C; BUB1; MAD2L1
Oocyte meiosis1.31E-06 CCNB1; CCNE2; CDC25C; BUB1; MAD2L1
p53 signaling pathway4.51E-06 CCNB1; CCNE2; CHEK1; GTSE1
Human T-cell leukemia virus 1 infection2.03E-05 CCNA2; CCNE2; CHEK1; BUB1B; MAD2L1
Cellular senescence1.05E-04 CCNA2; CCNB1; CCNE2; CHEK1
Base excision repair0.0011914 FEN1; POLE2
Hepatitis B0.0020202 CCNA2; CCNE2; BIRC5
Viral carcinogenesis0.0036535 CCNA2; CCNE2; CHEK1
Table 4

GO biological process analysis

TermP valueGenes
Mitotic sister chromatid segregation (GO:0000070)3.97E-11 CCNB1; KIF18B; KIF14; NUSAP1; NCAPG; NCAPH; DLGAP5
Mitotic cell cycle phase transition (GO:0044772)1.29E-09 PLK4; CCNA2; CCNB1; CCNE2; PRIM1; POLE2; MCM4; CDC25C
Spindle assembly checkpoint (GO:0071173)1.11E-08 CENPF; BUB1B; TTK; BUB1
Mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (GO:0007094)1.11E-08 CENPF; BUB1B; TTK; BUB1
Mitotic spindle checkpoint (GO:0071174)1.11E-08 CENPF; BUB1B; TTK; BUB1
regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transition (GO:1901990)1.13E-08 PLK4; CCNB1; CENPF; KIF14; BUB1B; HMMR; MAD2L1
Positive regulation of cell cycle process (GO:0090068)1.42E-08 FEN1; CCNB1; RACGAP1; KIF14; NUSAP1; MAD2L1
DNA metabolic process (GO:0006259)1.99E-08 WDHD1; FEN1; PRIM1; POLE2; CHEK1; MCM4; KPNA2; CDC25C
DNA replication (GO:0006260)2.82E-08 WDHD1; FEN1; POLE2; CHEK1; MCM4; CDC25C
Regulation of G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycle (GO:0010389)1.02E-07 PLK4; CCNB1; CENPF; KIF14; HMMR; DTL
Table 5

GO cellular component analysis

TermP valueGenes
Spindle (GO:0005819)3.30E-10 CCNB1; CENPF; RACGAP1; KIF14; NUSAP1; BUB1B; TTK; MAD2L1
Nuclear chromosome part (GO:0044454)5.48E-09 WDHD1; FEN1; CCNB1; PRIM1; POLE2; BUB1B; MCM4; BUB1; NCAPH
Chromosomal region (GO:0098687)1.16E-07 CENPF; DSCC1; CHEK1; BIRC5; OIP5
Spindle midzone (GO:0051233)1.44E-07 KIF18B; RACGAP1; KIF14; BUB1B
Mitotic spindle (GO:0072686)1.92E-07 ASPM; KIF18B; RACGAP1; NUSAP1; MAD2L1
Condensed nuclear chromosome kinetochore (GO:0000778)5.52E-07 CCNB1; BUB1B; BUB1
Chromosome, centromeric region (GO:0000775)1.03E-06 CENPF; DSCC1; BIRC5; OIP5
Condensed chromosome kinetochore (GO:0000777)3.21E-06 BUB1B; BIRC5; BUB1
Condensed chromosome, centromeric region (GO:0000779)9.62E-06 BUB1B; BIRC5; BUB1
Spindle pole (GO:0000922)2.26E-05 ASPM; CCNB1; CENPF; DLGAP5
Table 6

GO molecular function analysis

TermP valueGenes
Microtubule binding (GO:0008017)1.19E-05 KIF18B; RACGAP1; KIF14; NUSAP1; BIRC5
Tubulin binding (GO:0015631)4.28E-05 KIF18B; RACGAP1; KIF14; NUSAP1; BIRC5
Kinase binding (GO:0019900)4.27E-04 CCNA2; CCNB1; RACGAP1; KIF14; CDC25C
Protein kinase binding (GO:0019901)9.17E-04 CCNA2; CCNB1; RACGAP1; KIF14; CDC25C
Protein kinase activity (GO:0004672)0.0010748 PLK4; CCNA2; CHEK1; BUB1B; BUB1
ATP-dependent microtubule motor activity, plus-end-directed (GO:0008574)0.0011202 KIF18B; KIF14
cyclin-dependent protein kinase activity (GO:0097472)0.0013400 CCNA2; CCNB1
ATP-dependent microtubule motor activity (GO:1990939)0.0026130 KIF18B; KIF14
Microtubule motor activity (GO:0003777)0.0040194 KIF18B; KIF14
DNA-dependent ATPase activity (GO:0008094)0.0057059 DSCC1; MCM4
Functional enrichment analysis for module genes. (A,B,C,D) Represent the results of biological process, cellular component, molecular function and KEGG pathway analyses for module genes.

Hub genes analysis

The results of the prognostic analysis showed that all of the 10 hub genes (CCNA2, CCNB1, MAD2L1, BU1B, RACGAP1, CHEK1, BUB1, ASPM, NCAPG and TTK) have strong associations with a lower overall survival rate in liver cancer patients (P<0.05) (). Likewise, GEPIA analysis showed that the 10 hub genes are all overexpressed in HCC (). Lastly, using The Human Protein Atlas, we investigated the protein distribution data of six genes: CCNA2, CCNB1, MAD2L1, RACGAP1, NCAPG, TTK. All were found to be overexpressed in HCC ().
Figure 5

Prognostic analysis for hub genes. Using the Kaplan-Meier plotter database to make overall survival time analyses of the hub genes. (A) ASPM; (B) BUB1; (C) BUB1B; (D) CCNA2; (E) CCNB1; (F) CHEK1; (G) MAD2L1; (H) NCAPG; (I) RACGAP1; (J) TTK; (A-J) is in kmplot database. (K) APSM; (L) BUB1; (M) BUB1B; (N) CCNA2; (O) CCNB1; (P) CHEK1; (Q) MAD2L1; (R) NCAPG; (S) RACGAP1; (T) TTK; (K-T) is in TCGA database.

Figure 6

mRNA expression of hub genes. mRNA expression of hub genes in HCC tissue (red; n=369) and normal tissues (black; n=50). (A) CCNA2; (B) CCNB1; (C) MAD2L1; (D) BUB1B; (E) RACGAP1; (F) CHEK1; (G) BUB1; (H) ASPM; (I) NCAPG; (J) TTK; * represents P value <0.05.

Figure 7

Protein expression of CCNA2, CCNB1, MAD2L1, RACGAP1, NCAPG, TTK. The tissue microarray using paired tumor tissue and adjacent normal tissue from the margin of the tumor. Immunohistochemistry of tissue microarray was performed by using the antibody (CAB000114, CAB003804, HPA003348, HPA043912, HPA039613, CAB013229, Abcam). (A) Protein expression of CCNA2 in normal tissue (not detected); (B) protein expression of CCNA2 in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: strong; quantity: <25%); (C) protein expression of CCNB1 in normal tissue (not detected); (D) protein expression of CCNB1 in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: strong; quantity: <25%); (E) protein expression of MAD2L1 in normal tissue (not detected); (F) protein expression of MAD2L1 in tumor tissue (staining: low; intensity: weak; quantity: 75–25%); (G) protein expression of RACGAP1 in normal tissue (not detected); (H) protein expression of RACGAP1 in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: moderate; quantity: 75–25%); (I) protein expression of NCAPG in normal tissue (not detected); (J) protein expression of NCAPG in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: moderate; quantity: >75%); (K) protein expression of TTK in normal tissue(not detected); (L) protein expression of TTK in tumor tissue (staining: low; intensity: moderate; quantity: <25%).

Prognostic analysis for hub genes. Using the Kaplan-Meier plotter database to make overall survival time analyses of the hub genes. (A) ASPM; (B) BUB1; (C) BUB1B; (D) CCNA2; (E) CCNB1; (F) CHEK1; (G) MAD2L1; (H) NCAPG; (I) RACGAP1; (J) TTK; (A-J) is in kmplot database. (K) APSM; (L) BUB1; (M) BUB1B; (N) CCNA2; (O) CCNB1; (P) CHEK1; (Q) MAD2L1; (R) NCAPG; (S) RACGAP1; (T) TTK; (K-T) is in TCGA database. mRNA expression of hub genes. mRNA expression of hub genes in HCC tissue (red; n=369) and normal tissues (black; n=50). (A) CCNA2; (B) CCNB1; (C) MAD2L1; (D) BUB1B; (E) RACGAP1; (F) CHEK1; (G) BUB1; (H) ASPM; (I) NCAPG; (J) TTK; * represents P value <0.05. Protein expression of CCNA2, CCNB1, MAD2L1, RACGAP1, NCAPG, TTK. The tissue microarray using paired tumor tissue and adjacent normal tissue from the margin of the tumor. Immunohistochemistry of tissue microarray was performed by using the antibody (CAB000114, CAB003804, HPA003348, HPA043912, HPA039613, CAB013229, Abcam). (A) Protein expression of CCNA2 in normal tissue (not detected); (B) protein expression of CCNA2 in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: strong; quantity: <25%); (C) protein expression of CCNB1 in normal tissue (not detected); (D) protein expression of CCNB1 in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: strong; quantity: <25%); (E) protein expression of MAD2L1 in normal tissue (not detected); (F) protein expression of MAD2L1 in tumor tissue (staining: low; intensity: weak; quantity: 75–25%); (G) protein expression of RACGAP1 in normal tissue (not detected); (H) protein expression of RACGAP1 in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: moderate; quantity: 75–25%); (I) protein expression of NCAPG in normal tissue (not detected); (J) protein expression of NCAPG in tumor tissue (staining: medium; intensity: moderate; quantity: >75%); (K) protein expression of TTK in normal tissue(not detected); (L) protein expression of TTK in tumor tissue (staining: low; intensity: moderate; quantity: <25%).

Association between hub genes and metformin treatment

The GSE69850 dataset contains nine HepG2 samples treated by metformin and 39 controlled samples treated by DMSO. After analyzing the expression of the 10 hub genes in metformin-treated and control samples, we found that four genes, CCNA2, CCNB1, CHEK1 and BUB1, have a significantly lower expression in metformin-treated samples (P<0.05) (), suggesting that these genes may be involved in the mechanism of metformin treatment for T2DM and HCC.
Figure 8

Changes of gene expression of HepG2 cell lines after Metformin treatment. (A-J) Represent the gene expression in 9 Metformin-treated HepG2 cell lines (black) and 39 controlled HepG2 cell lines (grey). (A) CCNA2; (B) CCNB1; (C) MAD2L1; (D) BUB1B; (E) RACGAP1; (F) CHEK1; (G) BUB1; (H) ASPM; (I) NCAPG; (J) TTK. * represents P value <0.05; ** represents P value <0.01.

Changes of gene expression of HepG2 cell lines after Metformin treatment. (A-J) Represent the gene expression in 9 Metformin-treated HepG2 cell lines (black) and 39 controlled HepG2 cell lines (grey). (A) CCNA2; (B) CCNB1; (C) MAD2L1; (D) BUB1B; (E) RACGAP1; (F) CHEK1; (G) BUB1; (H) ASPM; (I) NCAPG; (J) TTK. * represents P value <0.05; ** represents P value <0.01.

Discussion

Both T2DM and HCC are globally epidemic diseases that place a huge burden on the patients and health services throughout the world. Many reports have indicated that T2DM is an independent risk factor for HCC. In this study, we have identified 256 genes that overlapped between T2DM DGEs and HCC DGEs, including 155 up-regulated genes and 101 down-regulated genes. Enrichment analyses show that the genes of the major module are largely associated with the cell cycle. Considering the ten identified hub genes, Cyclin A2, encoded by the cyclin A2 (CCNA2) gene, is a regulator of cell division and which activates Cdk1 and Cdk2, playing an important role in G1/S transition (7). Several studies have found that high levels of Cyclin A2 may be associated with carcinogenesis (8,9). It has also been reported that CCNA2 affects β-Cell proliferation (10) in the pancreas. Cyclin B1 (CCNB1) is a mitotic regulatory protein which complexes with CDK1 (CDC2) to form the maturation phase-promoting factor (MPF) and induces the G2/M phase transition in G2 phase cells (11). A meta-analysis has suggested that elevated expression of cyclin B1 may be associated with poor outcomes in lung cancer and esophageal carcinoma (12). It has also been found that increased cyclin B1 may promote the proliferation of HCC cells (13) and that it may be a biomarker and therapeutic target for recurrent HBV-related HCC (14). Mitotic arrest deficient 2 protein (MAD2L1) is an essential part of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint that ensures the proper alignment of chromosomes, strongly suggesting that MAD2L1 has a function in tumor suppression (15). Many studies have shown that the overexpression of MAD2L1 promotes the proliferation and metastasis of HCC (16). In addition, interactions between MAD2L1 and the insulin receptor have been reported, suggesting that MAD2L1 may influence the progression of diabetes (17,18). Genes budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles homolog 1 (BUB1) and budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 1 homolog beta (BUB1B) encode serine/threonine protein kinases that play important roles in mitosis and are also essential components of the spindle checkpoint (19), with most studies suggesting both BUB1 and BUB1B may contribute to the proliferation and metastasis of some types of cancer including HCC (20-22). Gene Rac GTPase activating protein 1 (RACGAP1) encodes a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) which is an essential component of the central spindle complex and plays an important role in cytokinesis its GAP activity (23). RACGAP1 can maintain cell survival (24) and has been reported to be associated with several cancers including HCC, particularly with the migration and invasion process (25-28). Gene non-SMC condensin I complex subunit G (NCAPG) encodes a subunit of the condensin complex, which plays a central role in mitotic chromosome assembly and segregation (29). Recently, some studies have suggested that NCAPG is overexpressed in HCC and suppression of NCAPG inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in HCC cells (30-32), while normal hepatocytes show low expression of NCAPG (31). CHEK1 encodes a serine/threonine kinase, which is required for checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage or the presence of unreplicated DNA. It is reported that CHEK1 plays an essential role in cell cycle progression and survival whether in the presence or absence of DNA damage (33). CHEK1 is reported to be significantly overexpressed in HCC (34), which may be the result of reduced miR-497 in HCC (35). Interestingly, another study has suggested that CHEK1 may induce the overexpression of CCNB1 to promote tumor growth in human colorectal cancer (36), while a CHEK1 inhibitor has been observed to have a significant effect in treating tumors (37). Abnormal spindle microtubule assembly (ASPM), a key gene for microcephaly (38), plays an essential role in regulating spindle poles (39). Several studies have suggested that ASPM is closely related to HCC and can be used as a marker for HCC metastasis and early recurrence (40,41). Gene TTK encodes a dual-specificity protein kinase with the ability to phosphorylate tyrosine, serine and threonine. It is an essential component of the spindle assembly checkpoint and is commonly overexpressed in many human tumors (42). TTK has been shown to have significant effects on HCC proliferation and sorafenib resistance, and it can serve as a biomarker and potential target for HCC treatment (43,44). We found that all ten hub genes are overexpressed in cancers, including HCC, and most of them play an important role in cell division. However, there are few reports of an association between these genes and T2DM. Metformin is a commonly used hyperglycemic drug. It has been reported to have inhibiting effect on many types of tumors including colorectal cancer, prostate cancer (45), lung cancer (46), pancreatic cancer (47) and HCC (6). It appears that its anti-tumorigenic effect may be related to the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (48). In this study, we found that four of the hub genes, CCNA2, CCNB1, CHEK1 and BUB1, may participate in the metformin treatment mechanism for T2DM and HCC and that these genes are all enriched in cell cycle control. It is possible that T2DM could promote the genesis of HCC via insulin resistance (49), over-activation of mTOR and chronic inflammation caused by adipokines (50). Besides, T2DM can also lead to NAFLD and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which are the main causes of HCC (51). Very few studies discuss the specific mechanism of the correlation between T2DM and HCC. Li et al. has suggested that high glucose promotes HCC cell proliferation and migration through the MEG3-MiR-483-3p-ERp29 pathway (52). The current study is the first exploration of the role of these 10 genes implicated in the combination of HCC and T2DM together with genes associated with metformin treatment for T2DM and HCC using a bioinformatics analysis. This study has several limitations. Firstly, the sample sizes of the datasets we used are small and, secondly, our findings still need to be verified in clinical practice. In conclusion, we have identified 256 DEGs and selected 10 genes (CCNA2, CCNB1, MAD2L1, BUB1B, RACGAP1, CHEK1, BUB1, ASPM, NCAPG and TTK) which may function biomarkers in both HCC and T2DM. We found four genes (CCNA2, CCNB1, CHEK1 and BUB) which may be the target of metformin treatment for T2DM and HCC. The specific mechanisms of action of these genes, however, require further investigation.
  52 in total

1.  Metformin and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Chin-Hsiao Tseng
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.828

2.  Autosomal recessive primary microcephaly due to ASPM mutations: An update.

Authors:  Pascaline Létard; Séverine Drunat; Yoann Vial; Sarah Duerinckx; Anais Ernault; Daniel Amram; Stéphanie Arpin; Marta Bertoli; Tiffany Busa; Berten Ceulemans; Julie Desir; Martine Doco-Fenzy; Siham Chafai Elalaoui; Koenraad Devriendt; Laurence Faivre; Christine Francannet; David Geneviève; Marion Gérard; Cyril Gitiaux; Sophie Julia; Sébastien Lebon; Toni Lubala; Michèle Mathieu-Dramard; Hélène Maurey; Julia Metreau; Sanaa Nasserereddine; Mathilde Nizon; Geneviève Pierquin; Nathalie Pouvreau; Clothilde Rivier-Ringenbach; Massimiliano Rossi; Elise Schaefer; Abdelaziz Sefiani; Sabine Sigaudy; Yves Sznajer; Yusuf Tunca; Sophie Guilmin Crepon; Corinne Alberti; Monique Elmaleh-Bergès; Brigitte Benzacken; Bernd Wollnick; C Geoffrey Woods; Anita Rauch; Marc Abramowicz; Vincent El Ghouzzi; Pierre Gressens; Alain Verloes; Sandrine Passemard
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  Interaction of MAD2 with the carboxyl terminus of the insulin receptor but not with the IGFIR. Evidence for release from the insulin receptor after activation.

Authors:  T J O'Neill; Y Zhu; T A Gustafson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-04-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Sylvia H Ley; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  ASPM is a novel marker for vascular invasion, early recurrence, and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shih-Yeh Lin; Hung-Wei Pan; Shu-Hsiang Liu; Yung-Ming Jeng; Fu-Chang Hu; Shian-Yang Peng; Po-Lin Lai; Hey-Chi Hsu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  CHEK again: revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapy.

Authors:  S McNeely; R Beckmann; A K Bence Lin
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 12.310

7.  Opposing prognostic roles of nuclear and cytoplasmic RACGAP1 expression in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Chung-Min Yeh; Wen-Wei Sung; Hung-Wen Lai; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Hsu-Heng Yen; Tzu-Cheng Su; Wei-Hsiang Chang; Chia-Yu Chen; Jiunn-Liang Ko; Chih-Jung Chen
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  CHK1 targets spleen tyrosine kinase (L) for proteolysis in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jian Hong; Kaishun Hu; Yunfei Yuan; Yi Sang; Qiangui Bu; Guihua Chen; Longjun Yang; Binkui Li; Pinzhu Huang; Dongtai Chen; Yi Liang; Ruhua Zhang; Jingxuan Pan; Yi-Xin Zeng; Tiebang Kang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Exendin-4 stimulation of cyclin A2 in beta-cell proliferation.

Authors:  Woo-Jin Song; Weston E Schreiber; Enhong Zhong; Fei-Fei Liu; Benjamin D Kornfeld; Fredric E Wondisford; Mehboob A Hussain
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Overexpression of BUB1B contributes to progression of prostate cancer and predicts poor outcome in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xin Fu; Guo Chen; Zhi-Duan Cai; Cong Wang; Ze-Zhen Liu; Zhuo-Yuan Lin; Yong-Ding Wu; Yu-Xiang Liang; Zhao-Dong Han; Jun-Chen Liu; Wei-De Zhong
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms Underlying Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Tingting Shi; Hideki Kobara; Kyoko Oura; Tsutomu Masaki
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-02-11

2.  Association of Polymorphisms within HOX Transcript Antisense RNA (HOTAIR) with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Laboratory Characteristics: A Preliminary Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Saman Sargazi; Mahdiyeh Ravanbakhsh; Milad Heidari Nia; Shekoufeh Mirinejad; Roghayeh Sheervalilou; Mahdi Majidpour; Hiva Danesh; Ramin Saravani
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.434

3.  Erratum to the genetic association between type 2 diabetic and hepatocellular carcinomas.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-08

4.  Development of a Predictive Immune-Related Gene Signature Associated With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient Prognosis.

Authors:  Jiasheng Lei; Dengyong Zhang; Chao Yao; Sheng Ding; Zheng Lu
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.