| Literature DB >> 32355729 |
Xiaoping Fan1, Jihai Peng2, Liming Lei1, Jie He3, Jinsong Huang1, Dingwen Zheng4, Wenliu Xu5, Shihao Cai6, Jimei Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Progressive dilatation is responsible for significant mortality and morbidity in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs). Studies have shown that the development and progression of TAAs are closely related to immune regulatory pathways and genes. Therefore, it is important to understand the immune regulatory mechanisms and biomarkers of TAA dilatation.Entities:
Keywords: Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs); immunocyte infiltration; integrated bioinformatic analysis; pathway enrichment
Year: 2020 PMID: 32355729 PMCID: PMC7186702 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1The differential expression and genetic function enrichment analysis with regard to both aortic intima-media (AMed) and aortic adventitia (AAdv) dilation. The volcano plot in presents the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for the comparison of dilated and nondilated AMed or AAdv samples. presents the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed based on the clusterProfiler and MetaScape databases, respectively. The sizes of the dots represent the counts of enriched DEGs, and the colors of the dots represent the adjusted P value for the GO term enrichment, while the dot size represents the negative Log(P value) for KEGG maps.
Figure 2Co-differentially expressed gene identification and genetic function enrichment analysis. indicates the results of overlap for the co-differentially expressed genes (co-DEGs) for the comparison of dilated and nondilated AMed or AAdv samples. The principal component analysis (PCA) in shows a significant distribution for the dilated and nondilated AMed or AAdv samples, respectively. indicates the results of hierarchical clustering analysis of the co-DEGs for the comparison of dilated and nondilated samples, and the BP terms of the different clusters were also constructed.
Figure 3The construction of the protein-protein interaction (PPI) and KEGG pathway network. represents the KEGG pathway network. The dot size represents the negative Log(P value). After extracting the hub genes of the significant pathway, the PPI network was constructed via the STRING database for interesting modules with a threshold value >0.4 in . The size of the font represents the degree of gene interaction. shows the expression analysis of the candidate genes.
Figure 4Detection of immunocyte infiltration and the significant immunocyte subtypes. The hierarchical clustering map of shows the immunocyte infiltration difference between dilated and nondilated AMed or AAdv samples, respectively. The boxplots of presenting the significantly infiltrated immunocyte subtypes involved in AMed or AAdv dilatation.
Figure 5Interaction analysis of candidate genes and significantly infiltrated immunocyte subtypes. shows the relationship between immunocytes and hub genes was presented by a clustering heatmap and circus plot with regard to AMed or AAdv dilatation, respectively.