Literature DB >> 32355717

Molecular mechanisms underlying radioresistance: data compiled from isogenic cell experiments.

Takahiro Oike1,2, Tatsuya Ohno1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355717      PMCID: PMC7186667          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


× No keyword cloud information.
Radiotherapy is an essential component of cancer therapy. Theoretically, a sufficiently high dose of radiation should achieve complete tumor control. However, in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), which is a commonly used modality, the dose delivered to the tumor is often compromised to prevent adverse effects on normal tissues surrounding the tumor. Newer modalities such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and particle radiotherapy can achieve higher dose conformality than 3D-CRT, leading to a higher dose delivery to the tumor. However, these high-precision radiotherapy modalities are less prevalent than 3D-CRT. Therefore, to maximize the efficacy of medical resources for radiotherapy as a whole, stratification of tumors based on photon sensitivity is crucial. This would lead to the preferential use of high-precision modalities for the treatment of relatively radioresistant tumors. To this end, the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer cell radioresistance need to be elucidated. In a study published in January, 2020, in Annals of Translational Medicine (1), Zhou et al. performed fractionated X-ray irradiation of a breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231, and established a radioresistant subline as well as mouse xenografts. Comparison of gene expression profiles between the parental line and the radioresistant subline identified CDKN1A and SOD2 as upregulated genes in the radioresistant cells. The authors also demonstrated that high CDKN1A/SOD2 expression could predict a poor prognosis for breast cancer patients. These data provide insight into the response of breast cancer to radiotherapy. In addition, the models developed are a useful tool for further investigation into this issue. Zhou et al. (1) demonstrated that the establishment and analysis of isogenic radioresistant sublines is a powerful strategy to explore the mechanisms underlying cancer cell radioresistance, which has been the subject of research for decades (). Previous studies suggested resistance to apoptosis (2,8-10,14,21,23) and high DNA repair capacity (7,9,13,19,23) as candidate mechanisms. In addition, studies show an association between radioresistance and high cellular migration (8,23,24) and antioxidant (1,9,17) capacities. Regarding the signaling pathways involved, the MAPK (18,22,24), PI3K (18,20,22,24), and JAK-STAT (12,22) axes consistently show increased activity in radioresistant cells. Activation of molecules associated with multi-drug resistance (9,25) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (11), alterations of cell cycle profiles (1,23) and immune systems (16), and other mechanisms (3-6,15) have also been reported as possible mechanisms associated with radioresistance. These findings provide an important biological basis for understanding the mechanisms underlying radioresistance. However, there is considerable variation among studies in the establishment of radioresistant cell lines in terms of histology of the cell line and irradiation protocols (i.e., total dose, single dose, and irradiation interval) (). Cross-validation of the results is necessary in the future to build robust evidence that can be translated to the clinic.
Table 1

Summary of previous studies that established isogenic radioresistant human cancer cell lines

Cancer typeCell lineTD (Gy)SD (Gy)IR protocolMain findingsRef.
NeuroblastomaIMR3230–602Every 5–7 daysApoptosis↓(2)
H&N SCCOECM1, KB, SAS602NAGp96↑(3)
H&N SCCHep-276.446.37Every 2 wksTelomerase activity↑(4)
H&N SCCSCC15, SCC25602NANM23-H1↑(5)
Eso AdTE-2, TE-9, TE-13, KYSE170602IR upon regrowthExpression change in various genes(6)
Eso AdOE33502IR upon regrowthPost-IR γH2AX foci↓(7)
Eso SCCTE-1, Eca-109302NAApoptosis↓, migration↑(8)
SCLCHR6937.50.755 days, every 1–3 wksMRP1↑, MRP2↑, GSTð↑, Topoisomerase IIα↑, bcl-2↓(9)
NSCLCH460802Over 20 wksTP53I3↓(10)
NSCLCA549602Over 24 wksEMT-associated proteins↑(11)
NSCLCA549, H358, H157802BiweeklyJAK2↑, STAT3↑, Bcl2↑, Bcl-XL↑(12)
NSCLC Breast cancerA549, SK-BR-312–163–4Every 10–12 daysDNA-PKcs↑(13)
Breast cancerMDA-MB-231502–10Over 6 wksCDKN1A↑, SOD2↑(1)
Breast cancerMDA-MB-23140–642–4Weekly or biweeklyApoptosis↓(14)
Breast cancerMDA-MB-231, MCF-7, T47D402Over 40 wks26S proteasome↓(15)
Breast cancerMCF-7641–4VariousIFN-stimulating genes↑(16)
Breast cancerMCF-7602Over 6 wksPrxII↑(17)
Breast cancerMCF-7, ZR-751572–7.5WeeklyEGFR↑, AKT↑, ERK↑(18)
HCCHepG21,6000.5Every 12 hPost-IR γH2AX foci↓(19)
HCC, UCCHepG2, HeLa310.5Every 12 h, 6 days/wkCyclin D1↑, AKT↑(20)
Pancreatic cancerPANC-1, AsPC-165–1205WeeklyBcl-XL↑(21)
Prostate cancerLNCaP, PC3, Du145102DailyEGFR↑, MAPK↑, PI3K↑, JAK-STAT↑(22)
Prostate cancer22rv1602NAApoptosis↓, S-phase cells↑, DNA repair↑, migration↑(23)
Skin SCCA431850.75–3Over 28 wksMigration↑, AKT↑, ERK↑(24)
T-cell leukemiaCEM751.55 days, every 3 wksMRP↑(25)

H&N, head and neck; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma, Eso, esophageal; Ad, adenocarcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; UCC, uterine cervical cancer; TD, total dose; SD, single dose; IR, irradiation; NA, not accessible; wk, week; Ref, reference. ↑, upregulation or increase; ↓, downregulation or decrease.

H&N, head and neck; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma, Eso, esophageal; Ad, adenocarcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; UCC, uterine cervical cancer; TD, total dose; SD, single dose; IR, irradiation; NA, not accessible; wk, week; Ref, reference. ↑, upregulation or increase; ↓, downregulation or decrease. In summary, studies on isogenic radioresistant cell lines provide clues to understand the mechanisms underlying cancer cell radioresistance, which will facilitate personalization of radiotherapy.
  25 in total

1.  The generation and characterization of a radiation-resistant model system to study radioresistance in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  A G Pearce; T M Segura; A C Rintala; N D Rintala-Maki; H Lee
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  cDNA expression analysis of a human radiosensitive-radioresistant cell line model identifies telomere function as a hallmark of radioresistance.

Authors:  Fu-Xiang Zhou; Jie Xiong; Zhi-Guo Luo; Jing Dai; Hai-Jun Yu; Zheng-Kai Liao; Han Lei; Cong-Hua Xie; Yun-Feng Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Intracellular signaling pathways regulating radioresistance of human prostate carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Ira Skvortsova; Sergej Skvortsov; Taras Stasyk; Uma Raju; Bela-Andre Popper; Bernhard Schiestl; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Andreas Neher; Guenther K Bonn; Lukas A Huber; Peter Lukas
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Identifying genes related to radiation resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  S Y Lee; H R Park; N H Cho; Y P Choi; S Y Rha; S W Park; S H Kim
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Epithelial to mesenchymal transition is a determinant of sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yasushi Shintani; Akira Okimura; Katsutoshi Sato; Tomoyuki Nakagiri; Yoshihisa Kadota; Masayohi Inoue; Noriyoshi Sawabata; Masato Minami; Naoki Ikeda; Kunimistu Kawahara; Tomoshige Matsumoto; Nariaki Matsuura; Mitsunori Ohta; Meinoshin Okumura
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Selection of radioresistant tumor cells and presence of ALDH1 activity in vitro.

Authors:  Julia Mihatsch; Mahmoud Toulany; Petra M Bareiss; Sabrina Grimm; Claudia Lengerke; Rainer Kehlbach; H Peter Rodemann
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  The role of peroxiredoxin II in radiation-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Tieli Wang; Daniel Tamae; Thomas LeBon; John E Shively; Yun Yen; Jian Jian Li
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Interferon-Stimulated Genes Are Involved in Cross-resistance to Radiotherapy in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Annemarie E M Post; Marcel Smid; Anika Nagelkerke; John W M Martens; Johan Bussink; Fred C G J Sweep; Paul N Span
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Differential gene expression profiles of radioresistant non-small-cell lung cancer cell lines established by fractionated irradiation: tumor protein p53-inducible protein 3 confers sensitivity to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Young Sook Lee; Jung-Hwa Oh; Seokjoo Yoon; Myung-Sang Kwon; Chang-Woo Song; Ki-Hwan Kim; Moon-June Cho; Mohamad Lalmodin Mollah; Young Jin Je; Yoon-Dong Kim; Chang Deok Kim; Jeung-Hoon Lee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  mRNA and methylation profiling of radioresistant esophageal cancer cells: the involvement of Sall2 in acquired aggressive phenotypes.

Authors:  Judong Luo; Wenjie Wang; Yiting Tang; Dandan Zhou; Yi Gao; Qi Zhang; Xifa Zhou; Hui Zhu; Ligang Xing; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-02-25       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  2 in total

1.  Thymidine phosphorylase induction by ionizing radiation antagonizes 5-fluorouracil resistance in human ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lucas D Lee; Ioannis Pozios; Verena Liu; Silke B Nachbichler; Dirk Böhmer; Carsten Kamphues; Katharina Beyer; Christiane J Bruns; Martin E Kreis; Hendrik Seeliger
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.017

2.  Clinically relevant radioresistant rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines: functional, molecular and immune-related characterization.

Authors:  Francesco Petragnano; Ilaria Pietrantoni; Simona Camero; Silvia Codenotti; Luisa Milazzo; Francesca Vulcano; Giampiero Macioce; Ilenia Giordani; Paolo Tini; Sara Cheleschi; Giovanni Luca Gravina; Claudio Festuccia; Alessandra Rossetti; Simona Delle Monache; Alessandra Ordinelli; Carmela Ciccarelli; Annunziata Mauro; Barboni Barbara; Cristina Antinozzi; Amalia Schiavetti; Roberto Maggio; Luigi Di Luigi; Antonella Polimeni; Cinzia Marchese; Vincenzo Tombolini; Alessandro Fanzani; Nicola Bernabò; Francesca Megiorni; Francesco Marampon
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.410

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.