Sebastian Zundler1,2, Verena Tauschek1, Markus F Neurath1,2. 1. Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kussmaul Campus for Medical Research & Translational Research Center, Erlangen, Germany. 2. Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An intact mucosal barrier is essential for homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract. Various pathological conditions such as infection or immune-mediated inflammation as well as therapeutic interventions like bowel surgery can result in injury of the intestinal mucosa. To counteract potential negative sequelae and to restore integrity of the tissue, a tightly regulated machinery of mechanisms exists, which crucially depends on the presence and absence of various immune cell subsets in different phases of intestinal wound healing. Cell trafficking is an increasingly acknowledged process that steers the localization of cells in tissues and the circulation. Thus, such cell circuits also crucially impact on the recruitment of immune cells in wound healing. SUMMARY: We performed a selective literature research. In our review, we will shortly delineate some basic principles of intestinal immune cell trafficking before discussing the contribution of different immune cells to wound healing. Finally, we will discuss potential clinical implications of immune cell trafficking and wound healing interactions in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and bowel surgery. KEY MESSAGES: Intestinal wound healing has immense importance in pathological conditions like IBD, anastomotic healing, and others. Immune cell trafficking is indispensable for the correct temporal and spatial interaction of the cells involved. Further research is required to understand the final consequences of interfering with immune cell trafficking for intestinal wound healing.
BACKGROUND: An intact mucosal barrier is essential for homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract. Various pathological conditions such as infection or immune-mediated inflammation as well as therapeutic interventions like bowel surgery can result in injury of the intestinal mucosa. To counteract potential negative sequelae and to restore integrity of the tissue, a tightly regulated machinery of mechanisms exists, which crucially depends on the presence and absence of various immune cell subsets in different phases of intestinal wound healing. Cell trafficking is an increasingly acknowledged process that steers the localization of cells in tissues and the circulation. Thus, such cell circuits also crucially impact on the recruitment of immune cells in wound healing. SUMMARY: We performed a selective literature research. In our review, we will shortly delineate some basic principles of intestinal immune cell trafficking before discussing the contribution of different immune cells to wound healing. Finally, we will discuss potential clinical implications of immune cell trafficking and wound healing interactions in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and bowel surgery. KEY MESSAGES: Intestinal wound healing has immense importance in pathological conditions like IBD, anastomotic healing, and others. Immune cell trafficking is indispensable for the correct temporal and spatial interaction of the cells involved. Further research is required to understand the final consequences of interfering with immune cell trafficking for intestinal wound healing.
Authors: Laura Cook; Martin Stahl; Xiao Han; Aisha Nazli; Katherine N MacDonald; May Q Wong; Kevin Tsai; Sara Dizzell; Kevan Jacobson; Brian Bressler; Charu Kaushic; Bruce A Vallance; Theodore S Steiner; Megan K Levings Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Jean M Daley; Samielle K Brancato; Alan A Thomay; Jonathan S Reichner; Jorge E Albina Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Amy L Lightner; Nicholas P McKenna; Sara Moncrief; John H Pemberton; Laura E Raffals; Kellie L Mathis Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Brian G Feagan; Paul Rutgeerts; Bruce E Sands; Stephen Hanauer; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; William J Sandborn; Gert Van Assche; Jeffrey Axler; Hyo-Jong Kim; Silvio Danese; Irving Fox; Catherine Milch; Serap Sankoh; Tim Wyant; Jing Xu; Asit Parikh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthias Nahrendorf; Filip K Swirski; Elena Aikawa; Lars Stangenberg; Thomas Wurdinger; Jose-Luiz Figueiredo; Peter Libby; Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2007-11-19 Impact factor: 14.307