Literature DB >> 32355632

VAST Clinical Trial: Safely Supplementing Tissue Lost to Degenerative Disc Disease.

Douglas P Beall1, Gregory L Wilson2, Randolph Bishop3, William Tally4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The function of the intervertebral disc is structural. Loss of tissue alters biomechanics, leads to subsequent disc degeneration, and is attributable to discogenic pain. A viable structural allograft was delivered into degenerate discs to determine whether intervention could safely stabilize anatomy, reduce pain, and improve function.
METHODS: Following institutional review board approval and patient consent, subjects were randomized to receive allograft or saline at either 1 or 2 levels or continue nonsurgical management (NSM). Data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Back pain with a visual analog scale (VAS) and disability by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were assessed, as were adverse events. This trial is registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03709901).
RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months, the VAS improved from 54.81, 55.25, and 62.255 in the allograft, saline, and NSM subjects, respectively, to 16.0 and 41.0 in the allograft and saline groups at 6 months, and 12.27 and 19.67, respectively, at 12 months. All subjects in the NSM cohort crossed over to allograft treatment. At 6 and 12 months, ODI improved from 53.73, 49.25, and 55.75 in the allograft, saline, and NSM subjects, respectively, to 18.47 and 28.75 in the allograft and saline groups 1 and 2 at 6 months, and 15.67 and 9.33, respectively, at 12 months. At 3 months the ODI of the NSM group was 62.75 and subjects reached 19.0 and 11.0 at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Adverse events were transient and resolved in all cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is supported by data demonstrating that improved pain and function at 12 months can be attained with a supplemental viable disc matrix. Subjects receiving the VIA Disc Matrix achieved improvements that were durable at 12 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Initial assessments indicate that a 1-level or 2-level treatment offers a reliable intervention that is safe and beneficial. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  back pain; disc degeneration; supplemental disc allograft; viable disc matrix

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355632      PMCID: PMC7188098          DOI: 10.14444/7033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  43 in total

1.  Classification of age-related changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo Award in basic science.

Authors:  Norbert Boos; Sabine Weissbach; Helmut Rohrbach; Christoph Weiler; Kevin F Spratt; Andreas G Nerlich
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The human lumbar intervertebral disc: evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration.

Authors:  J Antoniou; T Steffen; F Nelson; N Winterbottom; A P Hollander; R A Poole; M Aebi; M Alini
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Modulation of the biologic activity of the rabbit intervertebral disc by gene therapy: an in vivo study of adenovirus-mediated transfer of the human transforming growth factor beta 1 encoding gene.

Authors:  K Nishida; J D Kang; L G Gilbertson; S H Moon; J K Suh; M T Vogt; P D Robbins; C H Evans
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients.

Authors:  W S Zeegers; L M Bohnen; M Laaper; M J Verhaegen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Treatment of rabbit intervertebral disc degeneration with co-transfection by adeno-associated virus-mediated SOX9 and osteogenic protein-1 double genes in vivo.

Authors:  Shan Ren; Yongjun Liu; Jinfeng Ma; Yong Liu; Zezheng Diao; Deling Yang; Xu Zhang; Yongming Xi; Yougu Hu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.101

6.  The postoperative lumbar spine: enhanced MR evaluation of the intervertebral disk.

Authors:  J S Ross; R Zepp; M T Modic
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Biologic response of human intervertebral disc cells to gene therapy cocktail.

Authors:  Seong-Hwan Moon; Kotaro Nishida; Lars G Gilbertson; Hwan-Mo Lee; Hyang Kim; Ronald A Hall; Paul D Robbins; James D Kang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Vascular and neural pathology of lumbosacral spinal stenosis.

Authors:  R Watanabe; W W Parke
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Degeneration of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Jill P G Urban; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 10.  The potential of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing for the study and treatment of intervertebral disc pathologies.

Authors:  Olga Krupkova; Elena Cambria; Lenka Besse; Andrej Besse; Robert Bowles; Karin Wuertz-Kozak
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2018-03-15
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Development of Regenerative Medicine Targeted for Intervertebral Disc Disease.

Authors:  Daisuke Sakai; Jordy Schol; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 2.  Cell-based strategies for IVD repair: clinical progress and translational obstacles.

Authors:  Abbie L A Binch; Joan C Fitzgerald; Emily A Growney; Frank Barry
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 32.286

Review 3.  Application of stem cells in the repair of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Authors:  Wentao Zhang; Tianze Sun; Ying Li; Ming Yang; Yantao Zhao; Jing Liu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 6.832

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.