Literature DB >> 32355630

Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical, Etiological, and Radiological Diagnosis.

Afonso Cardoso1, Luís Barbosa1, Ana Marta Coelho1, João Gonçalves Correia1, Hélder Larguinho Maurício1, Álvaro Lima1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spondylodiscitis is an uncommon disease, and due to its indolent nature, it is often a late diagnosis. Great stress is put on the etiologic diagnosis, but blood cultures do not always yield positive results. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), despite being the diagnostic method of choice, is not always available. Our aim was to characterize the clinical presentation and to identify and check the efficacy of the etiologic and radiological methods of diagnosis of spondylodiscitis used at our hospital.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in which spontaneous spondylodiscitis cases were identified. The clinical presentation and the results of etiologic and radiological methods of diagnosis were analyzed.
RESULTS: Over a period of 5 years, 34 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the study. Regarding days of complaints, we identified a median of 9.5 days (1-547 days), with back pain being the predominant symptom. Fever was present in half the patients. Blood cultures were positive in 16 patients (48.5%). Nineteen patients underwent a computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy (positive in 7 patients [36.8%]), and 10 patients underwent a surgical biopsy (positive in half of them). Overall, 27 patients (79.4%) had an etiologic diagnosis. The diagnostic work-up consisted mostly of an initial CT scan followed by a confirmatory MRI. Of note, in 5 patients the CT scan did not reveal changes that were later confirmed by MRI. A total of 29 patients (85.3%) underwent an MRI, with 28 being diagnostic.
CONCLUSIONS: Spondylodiscitis remain a difficult diagnosis. Blood cultures should always be obtained before antibiotic administration and a CT-guided or surgical biopsy should be done if needed. Our results confirm the importance of MRI as the imaging modality of choice and highlight the possibility of false-negative CT scans and the inability of CT to allow for a definitive diagnosis. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT-guided biopsy; computed tomography scan; diagnosis; magnetic resonance imaging; spondylodiscitis; surgical biopsy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355630      PMCID: PMC7188090          DOI: 10.14444/7019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Vertebral osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Werner Zimmerli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Recent advances: infections of the spine.

Authors:  Frank L Acosta; Luis F Galvez; Henry E Aryan; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Spondylodiscitis: update on diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Theodore Gouliouris; Sani H Aliyu; Nicholas M Brown
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  Tuberculosis of the spine: a historical review.

Authors:  S M Tuli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Spondylodiscitis severity code: scoring system for the classification and treatment of non-specific spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  L Homagk; N Homagk; J R Klauss; K Roehl; G O Hofmann; D Marmelstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  New classification for the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: validation study on a population of 250 patients with a follow-up of 2 years.

Authors:  Enrico Pola; G Autore; V M Formica; V Pambianco; D Colangelo; R Cauda; M Fantoni
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Pyogenic infection of the spine.

Authors:  S K Malawski; S Lukawski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis in Adults.

Authors:  Elie F Berbari; Souha S Kanj; Todd J Kowalski; Rabih O Darouiche; Andreas F Widmer; Steven K Schmitt; Edward F Hendershot; Paul D Holtom; Paul M Huddleston; Gregory W Petermann; Douglas R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: analysis of 20 cases and review.

Authors:  A J Torda; T Gottlieb; R Bradbury
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Pyogenic spondylitis.

Authors:  W Y Cheung; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-specific spondylodiscitis: a new perspective for surgical treatment.

Authors:  Nicola Giampaolini; Massimo Berdini; Marco Rotini; Rosa Palmisani; Nicola Specchia; Monia Martiniani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.