Literature DB >> 32355555

COVID-19 must catalyse key global natural experiments.

Jasper V Been1,2, Aziz Sheikh2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355555      PMCID: PMC7179980          DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.010104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glob Health        ISSN: 2047-2978            Impact factor:   4.413


× No keyword cloud information.
The COVID-19 pandemic has in a matter of weeks fundamentally crippled health systems in many countries and is now threatening to cause a global economic depression [1]. This in turn is having an unprecedented impact on health care organisations’ ability to provide emergency care and on societies to provide core functions of the state. Even in such exceptionally challenging times, it is important to search for any possible glimmers of hope. One such glimmer comes from the unique opportunity to mount global natural experiments which, if we take, could ultimately contribute to deliberations that may result in the saving of more lives than are lost in this pandemic. We wish to highlight two key natural experiments that it is important to focus attention on. The first is countries’ responses to dealing with and mitigating the effects of the pandemic. There is considerable global variation in national responses ranging from immediate attempts to suppress the outbreak (as in China and South Korea, for example) to containment approaches aiming to promote the development of herd immunity (eg, as was initially the case in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands) [1]. These approaches will in due course need to be analysed to see which were in the round associated with the best overall population health and societal outcomes. A second major net of natural experiments that need to be undertaken is to establish on a global scale the impact of improvements in air quality on human and planetary health. The pandemic has resulted in the greatest restrictions in travel in human history, which have already led to very substantial reductions in ambient air nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter levels [2]. Given the range of potential adverse health outcomes associated with exposure to ambient air pollution [3,4], these observed reductions may have a major positive impact on population health, particularly in highly polluted areas pre-COVID-19. While still in the midst of the global turbulence caused by COVID-19, it is difficult to see any silver lining. We do however need to make the most of this adversity. We argue that mounting major international natural experiments to understand optimal approaches to national pandemic responses, and the effects of air quality improvements on human health represent very major opportunities to advance population health. Since such evaluations typically make use of routinely collected health care data [4-6], these efforts need not be disruptive to the immediate clinical need to address the pandemic. We must collectively seize these opportunities to help achieve a lasting benefit of the global tragedy now unfolding.
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Lancet Commission on pollution and health.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Richard Fuller; Nereus J R Acosta; Olusoji Adeyi; Robert Arnold; Niladri Nil Basu; Abdoulaye Bibi Baldé; Roberto Bertollini; Stephan Bose-O'Reilly; Jo Ivey Boufford; Patrick N Breysse; Thomas Chiles; Chulabhorn Mahidol; Awa M Coll-Seck; Maureen L Cropper; Julius Fobil; Valentin Fuster; Michael Greenstone; Andy Haines; David Hanrahan; David Hunter; Mukesh Khare; Alan Krupnick; Bruce Lanphear; Bindu Lohani; Keith Martin; Karen V Mathiasen; Maureen A McTeer; Christopher J L Murray; Johanita D Ndahimananjara; Frederica Perera; Janez Potočnik; Alexander S Preker; Jairam Ramesh; Johan Rockström; Carlos Salinas; Leona D Samson; Karti Sandilya; Peter D Sly; Kirk R Smith; Achim Steiner; Richard B Stewart; William A Suk; Onno C P van Schayck; Gautam N Yadama; Kandeh Yumkella; Ma Zhong
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Effect of tobacco control policies on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Timor Faber; Arun Kumar; Johan P Mackenbach; Christopher Millett; Sanjay Basu; Aziz Sheikh; Jasper V Been
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-09-05

3.  Improving air quality needs to be a policy priority for governments globally.

Authors:  Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic.

Authors:  Juliet Bedford; Delia Enria; Johan Giesecke; David L Heymann; Chikwe Ihekweazu; Gary Kobinger; H Clifford Lane; Ziad Memish; Myoung-Don Oh; Amadou Alpha Sall; Anne Schuchat; Kumnuan Ungchusak; Lothar H Wieler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Impact of London's low emission zone on air quality and children's respiratory health: a sequential annual cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ian S Mudway; Isobel Dundas; Helen E Wood; Nadine Marlin; Jeenath B Jamaludin; Stephen A Bremner; Louise Cross; Andrew Grieve; Alex Nanzer; Ben M Barratt; Sean Beevers; David Dajnak; Gary W Fuller; Anna Font; Grainne Colligan; Aziz Sheikh; Robert Walton; Jonathan Grigg; Frank J Kelly; Tak H Lee; Chris J Griffiths
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2018-11-15
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Natural experiments: A Nobel Prize awarded research design for strengthening causal inference on global health challenges.

Authors:  Famke Jm Mölenberg; Francisca Vargas Lopes
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 7.664

2.  Changes in fetal growth restriction and retinopathy of prematurity during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shumpei Obata; Riko Matsumoto; Masashi Kakinoki; Shunichiro Tsuji; Takashi Murakami; Takahide Yanagi; Yoshihiro Maruo; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.