Literature DB >> 32355459

A comparative analysis of mathematical methods for homogeneity estimation of the Lithuanian population.

Alma Molytė1,2, Alina Urnikytė1, Vaidutis Kučinskas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Population genetic structure is one of the most important population genetic parameters revealing its demographic features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the homogeneity of the  Lithuanian population on the  basis of the  genome-wide genotyping data. The comparative analysis of three methods - multidimensional scaling, principal components, and principal coordinates analysis - to visualize multidimensional genetics data was performed. The results of visualization (mapping images) are also presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The  data set consisted of 425 samples from six ethnolinguistic groups of the Lithuanian population. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole venous blood using either the phenol-chloroform extraction method or the automated DNA extraction platform TECAN Freedom EVO. Genotyping was performed at the Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania, with the Illumina HumanOmniExpress-12 v1.1 and the Infinium OmniExpress-24. For the estimation of homogeneity of the Lithuanian population, PLINK data file was obtained using PLINK v1.07 program. The  Past3 software was used to visualize the genotype data with multidimensional scaling and principal coordinates methods. The  SmartPCA from EIGENSOFT 7.2.1 program was used in the principal component analysis to determine the population structure.
CONCLUSIONS: Methods of multidimensional scaling, principal coordinate, and principal component for the genetic structure of the  Lithuanian population were investigated and compared. The principal coordinate and principal component methods can be used for genotyping data visualization, since any essential differences in the results obtained were not observed and compared to multidimensional scaling. The  Lithuanian population is homogenous whereas the points are strongly close when we use the principal coordinates or principal component methods. © Lietuvos mokslų akademija, 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genotypes data visualization; genotyping; multidimensional scaling; principal components; principal coordinate analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 32355459      PMCID: PMC7180405          DOI: 10.6001/actamedica.v26i4.4206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Med Litu        ISSN: 1392-0138


  3 in total

1.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding.

Authors:  S T Roweis; L K Saul
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Fast principal component analysis of large-scale genome-wide data.

Authors:  Gad Abraham; Michael Inouye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Population Structure Analysis and Genetic Diversity Detection of Four Chinese Indigenous Duck Breeds from Fujian Province.

Authors:  Ruiyi Lin; Jiaquan Li; Yue Yang; Yinhua Yang; Jimin Chen; Fanglu Zhao; Tianfang Xiao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.