| Literature DB >> 32355026 |
I Larin1,2, Y Zhang3,4, A Gasparian5, L Gan6, R Miskimen2, M Khandaker7, D Dale8, S Danagoulian9, E Pasyuk10, H Gao3,4, A Ahmidouch9, P Ambrozewicz9, V Baturin10, V Burkert10, E Clinton2, A Deur10, A Dolgolenko1, D Dutta11, G Fedotov12,13, J Feng6, S Gevorkyan14, A Glamazdin15, L Guo16, E Isupov12, M M Ito10, F Klein17, S Kowalski18, A Kubarovsky10, V Kubarovsky10, D Lawrence10, H Lu19, L Ma20, V Matveev1, B Morrison21, A Micherdzinska22, I Nakagawa23, K Park10, R Pedroni9, W Phelps24, D Protopopescu25, D Rimal16, D Romanov26, C Salgado7, A Shahinyan27, D Sober17, S Stepanyan10, V V Tarasov1, S Taylor10, A Vasiliev28, M Wood2, L Ye11, B Zihlmann10.
Abstract
The explicit breaking of the axial symmetry by quantum fluctuations gives rise to the so-called axial anomaly. This phenomenon is solely responsible for the decay of the neutral pion π0 into two photons (γγ), leading to its unusually short lifetime. We precisely measured the decay width Γ of the [Formula: see text] process. The differential cross sections for π0 photoproduction at forward angles were measured on two targets, carbon-12 and silicon-28, yielding [Formula: see text], where stat. denotes the statistical uncertainty and syst. the systematic uncertainty. We combined the results of this and an earlier experiment to generate a weighted average of [Formula: see text] Our final result has a total uncertainty of 1.50% and confirms the prediction based on the chiral anomaly in quantum chromodynamics.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID： 32355026 DOI： 10.1126/science.aay6641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Science ISSN： 0036-8075 Impact factor: 47.728