BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the ability of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging to detect myocardial ischemia in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory, and to compare this method with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE). METHODS: ATP-stress CTP and CFVR were performed in 50 patients with stable angina pectoris. Myocardial ischemia assessed from CTP imaging was defined as qualitative visual perfusion defects and reduced myocardial blood flow (MBF) based on quantitative assessment. A cut-off value of CFVR of 2.0 was used. RESULTS: The mean CFVR was 1.9 ± 0.6 in ischemic regions by CTP, whereas it was 2.9 ± 0.8 in non-ischemic regions (p < 0.001). CTP imaging could accurately predict CFVR <2.0 with 84.0% diagnostic accuracy (94.7% sensitivity, 77.4% specificity, 72.0% positive predictive value, and 96.0% negative predictive value). When receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the MBF data was performed to detect CFVR <2.0, the area under the curve was 0.89, and the optimal MBF cut-off value was 1.43 mL/g/min. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that qualitative and quantitative assessment of ATP-stress CTP exhibits a good correlation with CFVR for evaluation of myocardial ischemia.
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the ability of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-stress myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) imaging to detect myocardial ischemia in the left anterior descending artery (LAD) territory, and to compare this method with coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) measured by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE). METHODS:ATP-stress CTP and CFVR were performed in 50 patients with stable angina pectoris. Myocardial ischemia assessed from CTP imaging was defined as qualitative visual perfusion defects and reduced myocardial blood flow (MBF) based on quantitative assessment. A cut-off value of CFVR of 2.0 was used. RESULTS: The mean CFVR was 1.9 ± 0.6 in ischemic regions by CTP, whereas it was 2.9 ± 0.8 in non-ischemic regions (p < 0.001). CTP imaging could accurately predict CFVR <2.0 with 84.0% diagnostic accuracy (94.7% sensitivity, 77.4% specificity, 72.0% positive predictive value, and 96.0% negative predictive value). When receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the MBF data was performed to detect CFVR <2.0, the area under the curve was 0.89, and the optimal MBF cut-off value was 1.43 mL/g/min. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that qualitative and quantitative assessment of ATP-stress CTP exhibits a good correlation with CFVR for evaluation of myocardial ischemia.