Literature DB >> 32353905

The conditions of possibilities for recovery: A critical discourse analysis in a Danish psychiatric context.

Kim Jørgensen1, Jeanette Praestegaard2, Mari Holen3.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: This paper explores the conditions for the possibilities of recovery in a Danish mental healthcare practice, expressed from the perspective of nurses. The results and discussion of the study help to make visible and explore the muddle of conceptualisations of recovery in mental healthcare practice.
BACKGROUND: Few studies examine the possibilities of recovery for inpatients and outpatients in mental health centres from a nursing perspective.
DESIGN: A qualitative design using a critical social constructionist frame of understanding, in which the real world is considered as a series of social constructions.
METHOD: A Fairclough-inspired critical discourse analysis was chosen as the analytical strategy. The analysis is comprised of ten interviews in mental health care and notes, written by nurses, in medical records of ten patients with a mental illness admitted to a mental healthcare centre in 2016-2017. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used as a guideline to secure accurate and complete reporting of the study (See Appendix S1).
RESULTS: From the findings of the textual analysis and the analysis of the discourse practice, it seems clear that the social relations and structures relating to recovery in Danish psychiatry are steered and controlled by discourses that reflect, in general terms, the essence of the core of neoliberal ideology.
CONCLUSION: Recovery is generally articulated from an overall discourse of neoliberalism with its embedded discourses of paternalism, biomedicine, self-care and holism. All these discourses coexist in nursing practice, but the paternalistic discourse becomes the framework for the conditions for the possibility of how recovery is expressed in practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses need to be supported to seek clarity in the understanding and operationalisation of a recovery-oriented approach, if the agenda is to be truly adopted and strengthened.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical decision-making; clinical-research approaches; discourse analysis; mental health nursing; patient participation; recovery; user involvement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32353905     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  6 in total

1.  Healthcare Professionals' and Users' Experiences of Intersectoral Care between Hospital and Community Mental Healthcare.

Authors:  Kim Jørgensen; Mette Bonde Dahl; Jesper Frederiksen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Recovery-Oriented Intersectoral Care in Mental Health: As Perceived by Healthcare Professionals and Users.

Authors:  Kim Jørgensen; Tonie Rasmussen; Morten Hansen; Kate Andreasson; Bengt Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Measuring judiciarization of people with mental illnesses.

Authors:  Oxana Mikhaylova; Julia Naumova
Journal:  Crime Law Soc Change       Date:  2022-03-02

4.  Recovery-Oriented Practices in a Mental Health Centre for Citizens Experiencing Serious Mental Issues and Substance Use: As Perceived by Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Kim Jørgensen; Morten Hansen; Bengt Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  User Involvement in the Handover between Mental Health Hospitals and Community Mental Health: A Critical Discourse Analysis.

Authors:  Kim Jørgensen; Tonie Rasmussen; Morten Hansen; Kate Andreasson; Bengt Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Recovery-Oriented Cross-Sectoral Network Meetings between Mental Health Hospital Professionals and Community Mental Health Professionals: A Critical Discourse Analysis.

Authors:  Kim Jørgensen; Kate Andreasson; Tonie Rasmussen; Morten Hansen; Bengt Karlsson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.