Literature DB >> 32353805

Sugammadex versus neostigmine for reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade: A randomized, double-blinded study of thoracic surgical patients evaluating hypoxic episodes in the early postoperative period.

Tiffany S Moon1, Scott Reznik2, Taylor Pak3, Kathryn Jan3, Jessica Pruszynski2, Agnes Kim3, Katelynn M Smith3, Rachael Lu3, Joy Chen3, Irina Gasanova3, Pamela E Fox3, Babatunde Ogunnaike3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: This objective of this study was to determine if reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex versus neostigmine results in a decreased number of hypoxic episodes in the early postoperative period in patients undergoing thoracic surgery with single lung ventilation.
DESIGN: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, two-arm clinical trial.
SETTING: Operating room and postanesthesia care unit. PATIENTS: 92 subjects aged ≥18, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-IV, and undergoing a thoracic operation necessitating single lung ventilation.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received either 2 mg/kg sugammadex or 50 μg/kg neostigmine with 8 μg/kg glycopyrrolate for reversal of moderate neuromuscular blockade. MEASUREMENTS: For the first 90 min postoperatively, all episodes of hypoxia were recorded. Neuromuscular monitoring was performed with acceleromyography (TOF-Watch® SX) and the train of four (TOF) was recorded at 2, 5, 10, and 15 min after administration of the neuromuscular reversal agent. MAIN
RESULTS: Subjects who received neostigmine had a median of 1 episode (interquartile range IQR: 0-2.2) of hypoxia versus subjects who received sugammadex who had a median of 0 episodes (IQR: 0-1) (p = 0.009). The mean time to recovery of TOF ≥ 0.9 was significantly faster with sugammadex at 10 min (95% confidence interval CI: 5-15) compared with neostigmine at 40 min (95% CI: 15-53) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In thoracic surgical patients necessitating single lung ventilation, sugammadex provides faster reversal of moderate neuromuscular blockade and results in a decreased number of postoperative hypoxic episodes compared with neostigmine.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypoxia; Neuromuscular blockade; Sugammadex; Thoracic surgery; Train of four

Year:  2020        PMID: 32353805     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  3 in total

1.  Sugammadex in awakening from general anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adriano Anzai; Armelin Utino; Giuliano Tosello; Haroldo Katayama; Ighor Alexander Zamuner Spir; Luca Schiliró Tristão; Mary Martins Nery; Mauricio Anhesini; Osvaldo Silvestrini Tiezzi; Patricia Rodrigues Naufal Spir; Pericles Otani; Wanderley Marques Bernado
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.712

2.  A Clinical and Budgetary Impact Analysis of Introducing Sugammadex for Routine Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in a Hypothetical Cohort in the US.

Authors:  Yiling Jiang; Lori D Bash; Leif Saager
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Sugammadex for reversing neuromuscular blockages after lung surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Li Yang; Kuen-Bao Chen; Mei-Ling Shen; Wei-Ti Hsu; Yu-Wen Lai; Chieh-Min Hsu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.