Literature DB >> 32353722

Air quality status during 2020 Malaysia Movement Control Order (MCO) due to 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) pandemic.

Samsuri Abdullah1, Amalina Abu Mansor2, Nur Nazmi Liyana Mohd Napi3, Wan Nurdiyana Wan Mansor3, Ali Najah Ahmed4, Marzuki Ismail5, Zamzam Tuah Ahmad Ramly6.   

Abstract

An outbreak of respiratory illness which is proven to be infected by a 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) officially named as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first detected in Wuhan, China and has spread rapidly in other parts of China as well as other countries around the world, including Malaysia. The first case in Malaysia was identified on 25 January 2020 and the number of cases continue to rise since March 2020. Therefore, 2020 Malaysia Movement Control Order (MCO) was implemented with the aim to isolate the source of the COVID-19 outbreak. As a result, there were fewer number of motor vehicles on the road and the operation of industries was suspended, ergo reducing emissions of hazardous air pollutants in the atmosphere. We had acquired the Air Pollutant Index (API) data from the Department of Environment Malaysia on hourly basis before and during the MCO with the aim to track the changes of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at 68 air quality monitoring stations. It was found that the PM2.5 concentrations showed a high reduction of up to 58.4% during the MCO. Several red zone areas (>41 confirmed COVID-19 cases) had also reduced of up to 28.3% in the PM2.5 concentrations variation. The reduction did not solely depend on MCO, thus the researchers suggest a further study considering the influencing factors that need to be adhered to in the future.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollutant index; Coronavirus disease; Fine particulate matter; Malaysia; Movement control order

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32353722      PMCID: PMC7184995          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


Introduction

Coronavirus is one of the significant pathogens that affects human respiratory system. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a novel CoV, namely severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which is formerly known as 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) (H. Li et al., 2020). The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 began at Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China in late December 2019 (Q. Li et al., 2020). Considering the global threat, the World Health Organization (WHO) has declared COVID-19 as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) (Sohrabi et al., 2020). It is a pandemic that is spreading in other parts of Asia, such as Japan, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Australia as well as Europe and North America (Rothan and Byrareddy, 2020). Older people with the age of >80 years old has a high mortality susceptibility, with the case-fatality rate of 21.9% once infected with COVID-19 (Koh and Hoeing, 2020). In Malaysia, the earliest COVID-19 cases were detected on 25 January 2020 (Ministry of Health Malaysia, 2020). The number of cases have since then kept on increasing, especially in March 2020. This escalating COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia has urged several measures to be taken, including putting surveillance system in place to detect cases immediately; carrying out rapid diagnosis; performing immediate case isolation and rigorous tracking; and quarantining close contacts of those who have been tested positive in COVID-19. Malaysian government has announced the implementation of Movement Control Order (MCO) with the aim to isolate the source of the COVID-19 outbreak. Statistically, the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases at the end of Phase I MCO is 2766 cases (31 March 2020) and for Phase II is 4987 cases (14 April 2020) (Ministry of Health Malaysia, 2020). During MCO, several activities, including operating business is not allowed, except for essential services (Malaysian National Security Council (NSC), 2020). Since people are working from home and several industries are suspended, the traffic density and industrial emissions have reduced. In Malaysia, the sources of air pollution are derived from motor vehicles, industrial emissions, and open burning (Latif et al., 2014; Abdullah et al., 2019). The air quality status is defined based on the Air Pollutant Index (API) of 6 criteria pollutants whereby the dominant pollutant in Malaysia is fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Therefore, in this study, the researchers will evaluate the variation of PM2.5 changes during and before MCO in Malaysia.

Methods

In Malaysia, the air quality is managed by the Department of Environment under the Ministry of Environment and Water. The researchers acquired the Air Pollutant Index (API) data from the website of Air Pollutant Index of Malaysia (available at http://apims.doe.gov.my/public_v2/home.html) on hourly basis from 14 March 2020 to 14 April 2020 to determine the relative changes (%) of air quality. These data covered the air quality status before MCO (14–17 March 2020) (n = 6445), during Phase I MCO (18–31 March 2020) (n = 22,848) and Phase II MCO (1–14 April 2020) (n = 22,835). Overall, there are 0.19% of missing data and the total data used in this study is 55,128. The missing data were omitted in this study. The API for each hour was then converted to PM2.5 concentrations (μg/m3) (available at http://apims.doe.gov.my/public_v2/aboutapi.html). The computation of API and PM2.5 concentrations is shown in Table 1 .
Table 1

Computation of API and PM2.5 concentration.

APIBreakpoint of concentrationEquation for API
X = PM2.5 (24 h average, unit: μg/m3)
0–500 ≤ X ≤ 12.0API = 4.1667 ∗ X
51–10012.1 ≤ X ≤ 75.5API = 0.7741 ∗ (X − 12.1) + 51
101–20075.5 ≤ X ≤ 150.4API = 1.3218 ∗ (X − 75.5) + 101
201–300150.5 ≤ X ≤ 250.4API = 0.9909 ∗ (X − 150.5) + 201
301–400250.4 ≤ X ≤ 350.4API = 0.9909 ∗ (X − 250.5) + 301
401–500350.5 ≤ X ≤ 500.4API = 0.6604 ∗ (X − 350.5) + 401

∗ is multiply.

Computation of API and PM2.5 concentration. ∗ is multiply. All 68 air quality monitoring stations in Malaysia were selected in this study, as shown in Table 2 . The stations are responsible of monitoring the air quality status in Malaysia comprehensively (available at http://apims.doe.gov.my/public_v2/aboutapi.html) to detect any significant changes in the environment quality that may be harmful to human health and the environment (Department of Environment Malaysia, 2020).
Table 2

Air quality monitoring stations in Malaysia.

StationRegionStateLocation
S1NorthPerlisKangar
S2KedahLangkawi
S3KedahAlor Setar
S4KedahSungai Petani
S5KedahKulim Hi-Tech
S6Pulau PinangSeberang Jaya
S7Pulau PinangSeberang Perai
S8Pulau PinangMinden
S9Pulau PinangBalik Pulau
S10PerakTaiping
S11PerakTasek Ipoh
S12PerakPegoh Ipoh
S13PerakSeri Manjung
S14PerakTanjung Malim
S15CentralKuala LumpurBatu Muda
S16Kuala LumpurCheras
S17PutrajayaPutrajaya
S18SelangorKuala Selangor
S19SelangorPetaling Jaya
S20SelangorShah Alam
S21SelangorKlang
S22SelangorBanting
S23SelangorJohan Setia Klang
S24SouthNegeri SembilanNilai
S25Negeri SembilanSeremban
S26Negeri SembilanPort Dickson
S27MelakaAlor Gajah
S28MelakaBukit Rambai
S29MelakaBandaraya Melaka
S30JohorSegamat
S31JohorBatu Pahat
S32JohorKluang
S33JohorLarkin
S34JohorPasir Gudang
S35JohorPengerang
S36JohorKota Tinggi
S37JohorTangkak
S38EastPahangRompin
S39PahangTemerloh
S40PahangJerantut
S41PahangIndera Mahkota Kuantan
S42PahangBalok Baru Kuantan
S43TerengganuKemaman
S44TerengganuPaka
S45TerengganuKuala Terengganu
S46TerengganuBesut
S47KelantanTanah Merah
S48KelantanKota Bharu
S49SabahSabahTawau
S50SabahSandakan
S51SabahKota Kinabalu
S52SabahKimanis
S53SabahKeningau
S54LabuanLabuan
S55SabahPoliteknik Kota Kinabalu
S56SarawakSarawakLimbang
S57SarawakILP Miri
S58SarawakMiri
S59SarawakSamalaju
S60SarawakBintulu
S61SarawakMukah
S62SarawakKapit
S63SarawakSibu
S64SarawakSarikei
S65SarawakSri Aman
S66SarawakSamarahan
S67SarawakKuching
S68SarawakIPD Serian
Air quality monitoring stations in Malaysia.

Results and discussion

The MCO has been found to reduce PM2.5 concentrations. Before the implementation of MCO and during the MCO (18 March–14 April 2020), the daily PM2.5 concentrations were in the range of 5.3–42.5 μg/m3 and 3.9–69.2 μg/m3, respectively. The New Malaysia Ambient Air Quality Standard (NMAAQS) has set the standard limit of PM2.5 to 35 μg/m3 for a 24-hour average (Department of Environment Malaysia, 2020) and the World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) has set a more stringent limit of PM2.5 to 25 μg/m3. Before MCO, one of the air quality monitoring stations that exceeded the limit was Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (S55) (42.5 μg/m3), while during MCO, the PM2.5 concentrations at Rompin (S38) exceeded the limit of NMAAQS with 69.2 μg/m3. Table 3 shows the variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before and during MCO. The reduction of PM2.5 concentrations occurred at 34 stations, which attributed for 50% of overall stations. The highest reduction was at Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (S55), with 58.5% (Before = 41.2 μg/m3; During MOC = 17.1 μg/m3), while the lowest reduction was at Miri (S58), with 0.6% (reduce at 0.1 μg/m3). Table 4 shows the variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before and during MCO I. The reduction of PM2.5 concentrations occurred at 29 stations, which attributed for 42.6% of overall stations. The highest reduction was at Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (S55), with 53.6% (Before = 41.2 μg/m3; MCO I = 19.1 μg/m3), while the lowest reduction was at Mindin (S8), with 0.8% (Before = 19.6 μg/m3; During MCO I = 19.7 μg/m3). Table 5 shows the variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations during MCO I and MCO II. Interestingly, the reduction of PM2.5 concentrations occurred at 52 stations, which attributed for 76.5% of overall stations. The highest reduction was at Seberang Perai (S7), with 35.1% (MCO I = 21.1 μg/m3; MCO II = 13.7 μg/m3), while the lowest reduction was at Mindin (S8), with 0.3% (reduce at 0.1 μg/m3). Fig. 1 shows the reduction average of PM2.5 based on different regions in Peninsular Malaysia (North, Central, South, East) and the East Malaysia of Sabah and Sarawak. High reductions were found in Peninsular Malaysia at the North (23.7%), Central (16.2%), South (15%), and East (11.3%) regions as well as the East Malaysia of Sabah (23.1%) and Sarawak (13.6%) at a different timeline before MCO, during MCO I and MCO II. The ranges of reduction were 6.5–23.7%, 8.8–16.2%, 11.0–13.3%, 7.7–11.3%, 15.8–23.1%, 9.5–13.6% for North, Central, South, and East of Peninsular Malaysia, followed by the East Malaysia of Sabah and Sarawak, respectively.
Table 3

Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before MCO and during MCO.

LocationBefore MCODuring MCOVariation
μg/m3%
Kangar11.312.61.3+11.8
Langkawi11.712.40.7+6.3
Alor Setar15.416.81.3+8.7
Sungai Petani20.818.2−2.6−12.5
Kulim Hi-Tech20.015.7−4.3−21.5
Seberang Jaya21.621.0−0.6−2.9
Seberang Perai19.217.4−1.8−9.4
Minden19.716.2−3.5−17.7
Balik Pulau19.320.31.0+5.2
Taiping20.316.4−3.9−19.2
Tasek Ipoh20.917.7−3.2−15.2
Pegoh Ipoh18.318.70.5+2.5
Seri Manjung21.217.7−3.5−16.3
Tanjung Malim11.59.3−2.3−19.7
Batu Muda16.918.81.9+11.4
Cheras14.415.71.4+9.4
Putrajaya15.017.62.5+16.9
Kuala Selangor18.815.5−3.3−17.5
Petaling Jaya22.116.7−5.4−24.3
Shah Alam18.517.3−1.3−6.8
Klang19.522.02.5+13.0
Banting12.615.02.4+18.7
Nilai14.115.81.7+11.8
Seremban10.112.01.9+18.9
Port Dickson11.213.82.6+23.0
Alor Gajah8.910.92.0+22.8
Bukit Rambai12.413.00.6+4.8
Bandaraya Melaka11.013.32.3+20.6
Segamat14.018.94.9+34.8
Batu Pahat9.411.72.2+23.9
Kluang9.19.60.5+5.0
Larkin13.613.90.3+2.0
Pasir Gudang9.310.91.6+17.1
Pengerang8.014.56.5+82.1
Kota Tinggi8.17.2−0.9−11.0
Tangkak12.613.71.1+8.8
Rompin8.619.210.5+122.4
Temerloh12.414.11.7+13.6
Jerantut12.512.90.3+2.7
Indera Mahkota Kuantan8.58.80.2+2.9
Balok Baru Kuantan10.39.6−0.7−7.0
Kemaman14.812.6−2.3−15.2
Paka8.79.20.5+5.8
Kuala Terengganu13.317.03.8+28.3
Besut11.013.32.3+21.0
Tanah Merah23.822.9−0.9−3.9
Kota Bharu12.018.86.8+57.0
Tawau8.77.2−1.6−17.8
Sandakan12.210.0−2.2−18.3
Kota Kinabalu13.711.7−2.0−14.3
Kimanis22.513.7−8.8−39.0
Keningau12.511.9−0.6−4.7
Labuan14.914.8−0.1−0.8
Limbang11.39.4−1.9−16.6
ILP Miri20.518.5−2.0−9.9
Miri12.012.0−0.1−0.6
Samalaju13.012.0−1.0−8.1
Bintulu13.913.5−0.3−2.4
Mukah7.77.3−0.3−4.2
Kapit7.46.8−0.6−8.4
Sibu11.39.5−1.8−15.9
Sarikei9.07.1−1.9−21.3
Sri Aman8.17.8−0.3−3.8
Samarahan8.18.60.5+6.5
Kuching8.99.80.9+10.4
Johan Setia Klang41.929.1−12.8−30.6
IPD Serian5.47.01.6+29.4
Politeknik Kota Kinabalu41.217.1−24.1−58.5
Table 4

Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before MCO and MCO I.

LocationBefore MCOMCO IVariation
μg/m3%
Kangar11.313.21.9+17.2
Langkawi11.712.91.3+10.9
Alor Setar15.420.24.7+30.7
Sungai Petani20.821.10.3+1.4
Kulim Hi-Tech20.018.6−1.3−6.7
Seberang Jaya21.625.43.8+17.6
Seberang Perai19.221.11.9+9.9
Minden19.719.6−0.1−0.8
Balik Pulau19.323.64.2+22.0
Taiping20.319.1−1.2−6.0
Tasek Ipoh20.920.1−0.8−3.9
Pegoh Ipoh18.319.21.0+5.3
Seri Manjung21.218.8−2.4−11.3
Tanjung Malim11.510.3−1.2−10.2
Batu Muda16.919.12.2+13.1
Cheras14.416.11.7+12.1
Putrajaya15.018.02.9+19.4
Kuala Selangor18.817.6−1.2−6.2
Petaling Jaya22.117.2−4.9−22.0
Shah Alam18.517.7−0.8−4.3
Klang19.523.43.9+19.9
Banting12.615.93.3+25.9
Nilai14.116.32.1+15.2
Seremban10.112.82.7+26.2
Port Dickson11.215.03.8+33.4
Alor Gajah8.911.32.4+27.4
Bukit Rambai12.413.10.7+5.5
Bandaraya Melaka11.013.92.9+26.7
Segamat14.017.33.3+23.2
Batu Pahat9.411.52.1+22.2
Kluang9.111.12.0+22.3
Larkin13.614.40.8+5.8
Pasir Gudang9.310.81.5+16.3
Pengerang8.017.19.1+115.0
Kota Tinggi8.16.9−1.2−15.0
Tangkak12.614.92.3+18.2
Rompin8.617.38.7+100.6
Temerloh12.414.62.2+17.6
Jerantut12.513.91.3+10.7
Indera Mahkota Kuantan8.58.90.3+4.0
Balok Baru Kuantan10.39.9−0.4−4.0
Kemaman14.812.8−2.0−13.8
Paka8.78.4−0.3−3.7
Kuala Terengganu13.318.85.5+41.7
Besut11.012.51.5+13.6
Tanah Merah23.824.00.2+0.8
Kota Bharu12.018.86.9+57.3
Tawau8.76.5−2.2−25.1
Sandakan12.29.0−3.3−26.6
Kota Kinabalu13.713.1−0.6−4.6
Kimanis22.516.1−6.4−28.4
Keningau12.512.60.1+0.4
Labuan14.916.61.7+11.4
Limbang11.39.2−2.1−18.5
ILP Miri20.521.20.6+3.1
Miri12.012.70.7+5.5
Samalaju13.012.1−0.9−7.3
Bintulu13.913.7−0.2−1.1
Mukah7.77.4−0.3−3.4
Kapit7.46.3−1.1−14.5
Sibu11.310.6−0.7−6.0
Sarikei9.07.0−2.0−22.1
Sri Aman8.17.3−0.8−9.5
Samarahan8.17.2−0.9−11.2
Kuching8.98.8−0.1−0.9
Johan Setia Klang41.932.0−9.9−23.6
IPD Serian5.46.91.527.2
Politeknik Kota Kinabalu41.219.1−22.1−53.6
Table 5

Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations during MCO I and MCO II.

LocationMCO IMCO IIVariation
μg/m3%
Kangar13.212.0−1.2−9.3
Langkawi12.911.9−1.1−8.3
Alor Setar20.213.4−6.8−33.6
Sungai Petani21.115.3−5.8−27.5
Kulim Hi-Tech18.612.7−5.9−31.8
Seberang Jaya25.416.6−8.8−34.8
Seberang Perai21.113.7−7.4−35.1
Minden19.612.9−6.7−34.1
Balik Pulau23.617.1−6.5−27.5
Taiping19.113.7−5.4−28.1
Tasek Ipoh20.115.4−4.7−23.6
Pegoh Ipoh19.218.2−1.0−5.2
Seri Manjung18.816.7−2.1−11.2
Tanjung Malim10.38.2−2.2−21.1
Batu Muda19.118.5−0.6−3.0
Cheras16.115.4−0.8−4.9
Putrajaya18.017.2−0.7−4.2
Kuala Selangor17.613.3−4.3−24.3
Petaling Jaya17.216.2−1.0−5.8
Shah Alam17.716.8−0.9−5.2
Klang23.420.7−2.7−11.5
Banting15.914.0−1.8−11.5
Nilai16.315.3−1.0−5.9
Seremban12.811.3−1.5−11.6
Port Dickson15.012.6−2.3−15.7
Alor Gajah11.310.5−0.8−7.1
Bukit Rambai13.112.9−0.2−1.5
Bandaraya Melaka13.912.6−1.3−9.6
Segamat17.320.53.2+18.8
Batu Pahat11.511.80.3+2.9
Kluang11.18.0−3.2−28.3
Larkin14.413.4−1.0−7.2
Pasir Gudang10.811.00.2+1.5
Pengerang17.111.9−5.2−30.6
Kota Tinggi6.97.50.6+9.3
Tangkak14.912.5−2.4−15.9
Rompin17.321.03.8+21.7
Temerloh14.613.6−1.0−6.8
Jerantut13.911.9−2.0−14.5
Indera Mahkota Kuantan8.98.7−0.2−2.1
Balok Baru Kuantan9.99.3−0.6−6.1
Kemaman12.812.4−0.4−3.2
Paka8.410.01.7+19.8
Kuala Terengganu18.815.3−3.6−19.0
Besut12.514.11.6+12.9
Tanah Merah24.021.8−2.3−9.4
Kota Bharu18.818.8−0.1−0.3
Tawau6.57.81.3+19.7
Sandakan9.011.02.0+22.7
Kota Kinabalu13.110.4−2.7−20.4
Kimanis16.111.3−4.8−29.6
Keningau12.611.3−1.3−10.2
Labuan16.613.0−3.6−21.9
Limbang9.29.70.4+4.7
ILP Miri21.215.8−5.3−25.2
Miri12.711.2−1.5−11.5
Samalaju12.111.9−0.2−1.7
Bintulu13.713.4−0.4−2.6
Mukah7.47.3−0.1−1.7
Kapit6.37.20.9+14.2
Sibu10.68.4−2.2−21.0
Sarikei7.07.10.1+2.0
Sri Aman7.38.20.9+12.6
Samarahan7.210.02.9+39.9
Kuching8.810.82.0+22.9
Johan Setia Klang (MCAQM)32.026.2−5.8−18.2
IPD Serian (MCAQM)6.97.10.2+3.5
Politeknik Kota Kinabalu (MCAQM)19.115.0−4.1−21.3
Fig. 1

Reduction average based on different regions.

Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before MCO and during MCO. Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations before MCO and MCO I. Variation of daily PM2.5 concentrations during MCO I and MCO II. Reduction average based on different regions. The MCO in Malaysia included several prohibitions of mass movement and gathering; Malaysians travelling abroad; tourists and visitors' entry; and educational institutions, government and private agencies (except for essential services) closure (Malaysian National Security Council (NSC), 2020). These restrictions indirectly reduce the air pollution in Malaysia, although a detailed study needs to be conducted by considering other influencing factors, including local meteorology and anthropogenic emissions. Based on the results, the MCO had successfully reduced pollutants emission, particularly PM2.5 concentrations, as there were less motor vehicles and industry activities during the MCO. There were several red zone areas with >41 cases of confirmed COVID-19 (Crisis Preparedness and Response Centre, 2020). Some red zone areas were then enforced under the Enhanced Movement Control Order (EMCO). The red zone areas included Kluang (S32) (28.3% reduction of PM2.5 concentrations, MCO I and MCO II), Jerantut (S40) (14.5%, MCO I and MCO II), Kota Bharu (S48) (0.3%, MCO I and MCO II), Petaling Jaya (S19) (24.3%, before and during MCO), Klang (S21) (11.5%, MCO I and MCO II), Cheras (S16) (4.9%, MCO I and MCO II), Seremban (S25) (11.6%, MCO I and MCO II), Bandaraya Melaka (S29) (9.6%, MCO I and MCO II), Tawau (S49) (25.1%, before and during MCO I), Kuching (S67) (0.9%, before and during MCO I), and Samarahan (S66) (11.2%, before and during MCO I). The researchers observed that the decreasing of PM2.5 concentrations mostly occurred after the MCO I. The movements and activities of residents living in the red zone area may have been restricted; however, pollutant emissions, especially from mobile sources had indirectly reduced in such areas. In Malaysia, Jerantut (S40) is considered as the background station (rural). Unfortunately, it did not show the lowest PM2.5 concentrations as expected whereby the PM2.5 concentrations before MCO was 12.5 μg/m3 and during MCO was 12.9 μg/m3 with an additional of 2.7%. The variation of PM2.5 concentrations was further increased with the increment of 10.7% when the researchers compared the PM2.5 concentrations before MCO (12.5 μg/m3) and during MCO I (13.9 μg/m3). It showed a decreasing variation (14.5%) between MCO I and MCO II, with 13.9 μg/m3 and 11.9 μg/m3, respectively. The researchers observed that this station did not show the lowest PM2.5 concentrations as a representative background station, thus a further study needs to be conducted by considering the other factors, including meteorological and the anthropogenic sources to justify the variation of PM2.5 at this station as compared with other stations. Previously, Latif et al., (2014) clarified that there is an emergence of development around 10 km radius from the station. This could affect the condition of the station as a background. A background station must be located at a remote area which has minimal influence of anthropogenic sources.

Conclusion

In this study, the researchers concluded that the MCO has significant effects in reducing the PM2.5 concentrations in Malaysia. It should be noted that other factors, such as weather conditions, traffic density, industrial activities, and biomass burning should be considered for further investigations. The MCO has been continued in Phase III, which started on 15 April 2020, and the PM2.5 concentrations are expected to continue to stay low, as several areas have been placed under enhanced MCO.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Samsuri Abdullah: Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Amalina Abu Mansor: Investigation, Formal analysis. Nur Nazmi Liyana Mohd Napi: Investigation, Formal analysis. Wan Nurdiyana Wan Mansor: Methodology. Ali Najah Ahmed: Methodology. Marzuki Ismail: Methodology. Zamzam Tuah Ahmad Ramly: Investigation, Formal analysis.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  6 in total

1.  Long term assessment of air quality from a background station on the Malaysian Peninsula.

Authors:  Mohd Talib Latif; Doreena Dominick; Fatimah Ahamad; Md Firoz Khan; Liew Juneng; Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah; Mohd Shahrul Mohd Nadzir
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia.

Authors:  Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 176.079

Review 3.  The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak.

Authors:  Hussin A Rothan; Siddappa N Byrareddy
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 7.094

4.  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Heng Li; Shang-Ming Liu; Xiao-Hua Yu; Shi-Lin Tang; Chao-Ke Tang
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  How Should the Rehabilitation Community Prepare for 2019-nCoV?

Authors:  Gerald Choon-Huat Koh; Helen Hoenig
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 6.  World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19).

Authors:  Catrin Sohrabi; Zaid Alsafi; Niamh O'Neill; Mehdi Khan; Ahmed Kerwan; Ahmed Al-Jabir; Christos Iosifidis; Riaz Agha
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 6.071

  6 in total
  28 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal impact of COVID-19 on Taiwan air quality in the absence of a lockdown: Influence of urban public transportation use and meteorological conditions.

Authors:  Yong Jie Wong; Huan-Yu Shiu; Jackson Hian-Hui Chang; Maggie Chel Gee Ooi; Hsueh-Hsun Li; Ryosuke Homma; Yoshihisa Shimizu; Pei-Te Chiueh; Luksanaree Maneechot; Nik Meriam Nik Sulaiman
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 11.072

2.  How Covid-19 pandemic and partial lockdown decisions affect air quality of a city? The case of Istanbul, Turkey.

Authors:  Erkan Celik; Muhammet Gul
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.219

Review 3.  Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on air quality: a study based on Air Quality Index.

Authors:  Sadhan Gope; Subhojit Dawn; Shreya Shree Das
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.190

4.  Unveiling the changes in urban atmospheric CO2 in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Florence (Italy).

Authors:  Stefania Venturi; Antonio Randazzo; Franco Tassi; Beniamino Gioli; Antonella Buccianti; Giovanni Gualtieri; Francesco Capecchiacci; Jacopo Cabassi; Lorenzo Brilli; Federico Carotenuto; Riccardo Santi; Carolina Vagnoli; Alessandro Zaldei; Orlando Vaselli
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Improvement in air quality and its impact on land surface temperature in major urban areas across India during the first lockdown of the pandemic.

Authors:  Bikash Ranjan Parida; Somnath Bar; Gareth Roberts; Shyama Prasad Mandal; Arvind Chandra Pandey; Manoj Kumar; Jadunandan Dash
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 8.431

6.  Decrease in Ambient Fine Particulate Matter during COVID-19 Crisis and Corresponding Health Benefits in Seoul, Korea.

Authors:  Changwoo Han; Yun-Chul Hong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  The implications of COVID-19 in the ambient environment and psychological conditions.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Qingwang Xue
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2021-01-12

8.  COVID-19 pandemic persuaded lockdown effects on environment over stone quarrying and crushing areas.

Authors:  Indrajit Mandal; Swades Pal
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Air quality changes in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Shelby Zangari; Dustin T Hill; Amanda T Charette; Jaime E Mirowsky
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 10.753

10.  Do air pollutants as well as meteorological factors impact Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Evidence from China based on the geographical perspective.

Authors:  Lin Pei; Xiaoxia Wang; Bin Guo; Hongjun Guo; Yan Yu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.