Zhuang-Shuang Li1, Felicity Hasson2. 1. School of Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Belfast BT37 0QB, Ireland. Electronic address: li-z17@ulster.ac.uk. 2. School of Nursing, Institute of Nursing and Health Sciences Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Belfast BT37 0QB, Ireland. Electronic address: f.hasson@ulster.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Synthesize the evidence relating to the interaction of resilience, stress, and well-being in undergraduate nursing students across countries. DESIGN: Systematic review DATA SOURCES: Peer reviewed studies published from 2008 to December 2018 were searched in CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline (OVID), PsycINFo and four biomedical databases originating from China (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, VIP and CMB). REVIEW METHODS: Adhering to the preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, eight databases were searched. Twelve studies, which met the inclusion criteria, were extracted, and subject to quality appraisal by two researchers. RESULTS: In total, 12 papers were included. Outcome analysis revealed the level of resilience as moderate; stress levels were high and the incidence of negative psychological health accounts for a proportion of nursing students. The interaction between resilience and stress and well-being was high. Resilience and low stress were found to better predict well-being. All the studies cited recommendations to inform educational policy and practice in relation to resilience, well-being, and stress among undergraduate nursing students. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first systematic review to synthesize the evidence relating to the interaction of resilience, stress, and well-being in undergraduate nursing students across cultural settings. Evidence confirms the importance of resilience in nursing students influencing stress and psychosocial morbidity. Nursing educational strategies that foster and enhance resilience is recommended.
OBJECTIVE: Synthesize the evidence relating to the interaction of resilience, stress, and well-being in undergraduate nursing students across countries. DESIGN: Systematic review DATA SOURCES: Peer reviewed studies published from 2008 to December 2018 were searched in CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline (OVID), PsycINFo and four biomedical databases originating from China (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, VIP and CMB). REVIEW METHODS: Adhering to the preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, eight databases were searched. Twelve studies, which met the inclusion criteria, were extracted, and subject to quality appraisal by two researchers. RESULTS: In total, 12 papers were included. Outcome analysis revealed the level of resilience as moderate; stress levels were high and the incidence of negative psychological health accounts for a proportion of nursing students. The interaction between resilience and stress and well-being was high. Resilience and low stress were found to better predict well-being. All the studies cited recommendations to inform educational policy and practice in relation to resilience, well-being, and stress among undergraduate nursing students. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first systematic review to synthesize the evidence relating to the interaction of resilience, stress, and well-being in undergraduate nursing students across cultural settings. Evidence confirms the importance of resilience in nursing students influencing stress and psychosocial morbidity. Nursing educational strategies that foster and enhance resilience is recommended.
Authors: Sharon M Fruh; Sarah E Taylor; Rebecca J Graves; Katey Hayes; Ryon McDermott; Caitlyn Hauff; Susan G Williams; Scott Sittig; Matthew Campbell; Geoffrey Hudson; Heather Hall; Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Jennifer L Barinas Journal: J Prof Nurs Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Ewa Kupcewicz; Elżbieta Grochans; Helena Kadučáková; Marzena Mikla; Marcin Jóźwik Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: K R Brouwer; L A Walmsley; E M Parrish; A K McCubbin; J D Welsh; C E C Braido; C T C Okoli Journal: Nurse Educ Today Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Stefan Bogaerts; Marianne van Woerkom; Yasemin Erbaş; Elien De Caluwé; Carlo Garofalo; Iris Frowijn; Ingeborg Jeandarme; Erik Masthoff; Marija Janković Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Marek Bartzik; Andreas Bentrup; Susanne Hill; Maria Bley; Eckart von Hirschhausen; Gerrit Krause; Peter Ahaus; Angelika Dahl-Dichmann; Corinna Peifer Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-07-02