Joseph C Brinkman1, Benjamin G Domb2, Aaron J Krych3, Bruce A Levy3, Justin L Makovicka1, Matthew Neville1, David E Hartigan4. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A. 2. American Hip Institute, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A. 4. Twin Cities Orthopedics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A.. Electronic address: davidhartigan44@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether labral size is predictive of labral repair failure or shows an association with patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair. Labral size was measured in 4 quadrants with an arthroscopic probe. The average size across torn labral segments was assessed for failure as determined by the change in patient-reported outcomes, the rate at which subjects achieved the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state, and the need for additional surgery. Outcomes were evaluated for any continuous correlation as well as significant differences between the middle 50% of labral sizes and classes of labral sizes derived from upper and lower quartile and decile ranges. Included hips were those from patients aged between 18 and 55 years with 2-year postoperative follow-up and lateral center-edge angles between 25° and 40°. RESULTS: The study included 571 hips. Labral width did not show a significant difference between hips requiring revision and those not requiring revision (P = .4054). No significant correlation was found between labral width and the change in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (R2 = 0.05780), modified Harris Hip Score (R2 = 0.19826), or Nonarthritic Hip Score (R2 = 0.23543) from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. Hips with labral sizes in the upper decile of our cohort showed significantly decreased improvement in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (P = .0287) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (P = .0490) compared with the middle 50% of labral sizes. No statistically significant difference was found in the rate at which the groups achieved the minimal clinically important difference or patient acceptable symptomatic state. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertrophic labra in the largest 10th percentile showed lower postoperative outcome scores. However, no detectable clinical benefit was found in terms of patient-perceived clinical difference or acceptable symptomatic state. For most patients, labral size does not appear to significantly alter patient outcomes or the need for arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
PURPOSE: To assess whether labral size is predictive of labral repair failure or shows an association with patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair. Labral size was measured in 4 quadrants with an arthroscopic probe. The average size across torn labral segments was assessed for failure as determined by the change in patient-reported outcomes, the rate at which subjects achieved the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state, and the need for additional surgery. Outcomes were evaluated for any continuous correlation as well as significant differences between the middle 50% of labral sizes and classes of labral sizes derived from upper and lower quartile and decile ranges. Included hips were those from patients aged between 18 and 55 years with 2-year postoperative follow-up and lateral center-edge angles between 25° and 40°. RESULTS: The study included 571 hips. Labral width did not show a significant difference between hips requiring revision and those not requiring revision (P = .4054). No significant correlation was found between labral width and the change in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (R2 = 0.05780), modified Harris Hip Score (R2 = 0.19826), or Nonarthritic Hip Score (R2 = 0.23543) from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. Hips with labral sizes in the upper decile of our cohort showed significantly decreased improvement in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (P = .0287) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (P = .0490) compared with the middle 50% of labral sizes. No statistically significant difference was found in the rate at which the groups achieved the minimal clinically important difference or patient acceptable symptomatic state. CONCLUSIONS:Hypertrophic labra in the largest 10th percentile showed lower postoperative outcome scores. However, no detectable clinical benefit was found in terms of patient-perceived clinical difference or acceptable symptomatic state. For most patients, labral size does not appear to significantly alter patient outcomes or the need for arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Authors: David A Bloom; Daniel J Kaplan; David J Kirby; Daniel B Buchalter; Charles C Lin; Jordan W Fried; Nainisha Chintalapudi; Thomas Youm Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jonathan D Haskel; Daniel J Kaplan; Noah Kirschner; Jordan W Fried; Mohammad Samim; Christopher Burke; Thomas Youm Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-03-15