Literature DB >> 32353510

A comparative in vitro toxicity assessment of electronic vaping product e-liquids and aerosols with tobacco cigarette smoke.

R Wieczorek1, G Phillips2, L Czekala3, E Trelles Sticken1, G O'Connell3, L Simms3, K Rudd3, M Stevenson3, T Walele3.   

Abstract

The use of electronic vaping products (EVPs) continues to increase worldwide among adult smokers in parallel with accumulating information on their potential toxicity and relative safety compared to tobacco smoke. At this time, in vitro assessments of many widely available EVPs are limited. In this study, an in vitro battery of established assays was used to examine the cytotoxic (Neutral red uptake), genotoxic (In vitro micronucleus) and mutagenic (Bacterial reverse mutation) responses of two commercial EVPs (blu GO™ disposable and blu PLUS+™ rechargeable) when compared to smoke from a reference cigarette (3R4F). In total, 12 commercial products were tested as e-liquids and as aerosols. In addition, two experimental base liquids containing 1.2% and 2.4% nicotine were also assessed to determine the effect of flavour and nicotine on all three assays. In the bacterial reverse mutation (Ames) and in vitro micronucleus (IVM) assays, exposures to e-liquids and EVP aerosols, with and without nicotine and in a range of flavourings, showed no mutagenic or genotoxic effects compared to tobacco smoke. The neutral red uptake (NRU) assay showed significantly reduced cytotoxicity (P < .05) for whole undiluted EVP aerosols compared to tobacco smoke, which by contrast was markedly cytotoxic even when diluted. The reduced in vitro toxicological responses of the EVPs add to the increasing body of scientific weight-of-evidence supporting the role of high-quality EVPs as a harm reduction tool for adult smokers.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cigarette; Cytotoxicity; E-liquids; Electronic cigarette; Electronic vapour product; Genotoxicity; In vitro toxicity; Mutagenicity; Tobacco

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32353510     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  6 in total

Review 1.  DNA damage, DNA repair and carcinogenicity: Tobacco smoke versus electronic cigarette aerosol.

Authors:  Moon-Shong Tang; Hyun-Wook Lee; Mao-Wen Weng; Hsiang-Tsui Wang; Yu Hu; Lung-Chi Chen; Sung-Hyun Park; Huei-Wei Chan; Jiheng Xu; Xue-Ru Wu; He Wang; Rui Yang; Karen Galdane; Kathryn Jackson; Annie Chu; Elizabeth Halzack
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.015

2.  Differential impact of JUUL flavors on pulmonary immune modulation and oxidative stress responses in male and female mice.

Authors:  Terek Been; Hussein Traboulsi; Sofia Paoli; Bayan Alakhtar; Koren K Mann; David H Eidelman; Carolyn J Baglole
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.168

3.  The in vitro ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation extension assay as a tool in the assessment of relative genotoxic potential of e-liquids and their aerosols.

Authors:  Lukasz Czekala; Fiona Chapman; Liam Simms; Kathryn Rudd; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Lisa Maria Bode; Jutta Pani; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Inger Brandsma; Giel Hendriks; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Reductions in biomarkers of exposure to selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents following exclusive and partial switching from combustible cigarettes to myblu electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS).

Authors:  Paul Morris; Simon McDermott; Fiona Chapman; Thomas Verron; Xavier Cahours; Matthew Stevenson; Joseph Thompson; Nveed Chaudhary; Grant O'Connell
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Nicotine Exerts Cytotoxic Effects in a Panel of Healthy Cell Lines and Strong Irritating Potential on Blood Vessels.

Authors:  Doina Chioran; Adrian Sitaru; Ioana Macasoi; Iulia Pinzaru; Cristian Andrei Sarau; Cristina Dehelean; Stefania Dinu; Camelia Szuhanek; Irina Nicoleta Zetu; Andra Cristine Serafin; Mircea Rivis; Marioara Poenaru; Razvan Dragoi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Multi-endpoint analysis of human 3D airway epithelium following repeated exposure to whole electronic vapor product aerosol or cigarette smoke.

Authors:  Lukasz Czekala; Roman Wieczorek; Liam Simms; Fan Yu; Jessica Budde; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Kathryn Rudd; Thomas Verron; Oleg Brinster; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.