Literature DB >> 32353486

Do nociceptive stimulation intensity and temporal predictability influence pain-induced corticospinal excitability modulation?

Cécilia Neige1, Clémentine Brun1, Martin Gagné1, Laurent J Bouyer2, Catherine Mercier3.   

Abstract

Temporal predictability and intensity of an impending nociceptive input both shape pain experience and modulate laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) amplitude. However, it remains unclear whether and how these two factors could influence pain-induced corticospinal excitability modulation. The current study investigated the influence of nociceptive stimulation intensity and temporal predictability on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) modulation, in parallel to their effect on pain perception and LEPs amplitude. Twenty participants completed electroencephalographic and transcranial magnetic stimulation experiments during which two laser nociceptive stimulation intensities (high and low) were either unpredictably delivered (random delay) or preceded by a fixed-timing cue (fixed delay). The amplitude of the conditioned MEPs was significantly reduced only for the high nociceptive stimulation and was not affected by the temporal predictability of pain (despite the fact that temporal predictability modulated the amplitude of P2 LEP component amplitude). However, a posteriori analyses based on patterns of pain-induced MEPs modulation revealed that participants in which nociceptive stimulation resulted in an increase in corticospinal excitability were more affected by the predictability of pain (i.e. increasing corticospinal excitability even more when pain occurrence was predictable), regardless of the nociceptive stimulation intensity; whereas participants in which nociceptive stimulation resulted in a decrease in corticospinal excitability were sensitive to the intensity of the stimulation but not its predictability. These results suggest a potential influence of cognitive factors such as temporal predictability on the response of the motor system in the presence of pain for some participants, contributing to explain, at least in part, the high variability highlighted in a number of previous studies.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipation; Electroencephalography; Motor evoked potentials; Pain modulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32353486     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  2 in total

1.  Impact of Experimental Tonic Pain on Corrective Motor Responses to Mechanical Perturbations.

Authors:  Elodie Traverse; Clémentine Brun; Émilie Harnois; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Does musculoskeletal pain interfere with motor learning in a gait adaptation task? A proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Frédérique Dupuis; Benoit Pairot de Fontenay; Jason Bouffard; Marc Bouchard; Laurent J Bouyer; Catherine Mercier; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.