| Literature DB >> 32353433 |
Aijaz Parray1, Yongli Ma2, Mustafa Alam3, Naveed Akhtar1, Abdul Salam1, Fayaz Mir4, Shahnaz Qadri5, Sajitha V Pananchikkal1, Ruth Priyanka1, Saadat Kamran1, Ian R Winship6, Ashfaq Shuaib7.
Abstract
Remote ischemic perconditioning (RIPerC) results in collateral enhancement and a reduction in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) induced ischemia. RIPerC likely activates multiple metabolic protective mechanisms, including effects on matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and protein kinases. Here we explore if RIPerC improves neuroprotection and collateral flow by modifying the activities of MMP-9 and AMPK/e-NOS. Age matched adult male Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to MCAO followed one hour later by RIPerC (3 cycles of 15 min ischemia). Animals were euthanized 24 h post-MCAO. Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining 24 h post-MCAO revealed a significant (p < 0.02) reduction in the infarction volume in RIPerC treated animals (24.9 ± 5.4%) relative to MCAO controls (42.5 ± 4.2, %). TUNEL staining showed a 42.6% reduction in the apoptotic cells with RIPerC treatment (p < 0.01). Immunoblotting in congruence with RT-PCR and Zymography showed that RIPerC significantly reduced MMP-9 expression and activity in RIPerC + MCAO group compared to MCAO group (218.3 ± 19.1% vs. 148.9 ± 12.05% (p < 0.01). Immunoblotting revealed that RIPerC was associated with a significant 2.5-fold increase in activation of p-AMPK compared to the MCAO group (p < 0.01) which was also associated with a significant increase in the e-NOS activity (p < 0.01). RIPerC resulted in reduction of infarction volume, decreased apoptotic cell death and attenuated MMP-9 activity. This together with the increased activity of p-AMPK and increase in p-eNOS may, in part explain the neuroprotection and sustained increase in blood flow observed with RIPerC following acute stroke.Entities:
Keywords: 5′ adenosine monophosphate-activated protein; Endothelial nitric oxide synthase; Focal ischemia; Remote ischemic perconditioning
Year: 2020 PMID: 32353433 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN: 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252