Literature DB >> 32352387

Machine Learning Models for the Prediction of Postpartum Depression: Application and Comparison Based on a Cohort Study.

Wenjie Gong1, Weina Zhang1, Han Liu2, Vincent Michael Bernard Silenzio3, Peiyuan Qiu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a serious public health problem. Building a predictive model for PPD using data during pregnancy can facilitate earlier identification and intervention.
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study are to compare the effects of four different machine learning models using data during pregnancy to predict PPD and explore which factors in the model are the most important for PPD prediction.
METHODS: Information on the pregnancy period from a cohort of 508 women, including demographics, social environmental factors, and mental health, was used as predictors in the models. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale score within 42 days after delivery was used as the outcome indicator. Using two feature selection methods (expert consultation and random forest-based filter feature selection [FFS-RF]) and two algorithms (support vector machine [SVM] and random forest [RF]), we developed four different machine learning PPD prediction models and compared their prediction effects.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of the two feature selection methods in terms of model prediction performance, but 10 fewer factors were selected with the FFS-RF than with the expert consultation method. The model based on SVM and FFS-RF had the best prediction effects (sensitivity=0.69, area under the curve=0.78). In the feature importance ranking output by the RF algorithm, psychological elasticity, depression during the third trimester, and income level were the most important predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the expert consultation method, FFS-RF was important in dimension reduction. When the sample size is small, the SVM algorithm is suitable for predicting PPD. In the prevention of PPD, more attention should be paid to the psychological resilience of mothers. ©Weina Zhang, Han Liu, Vincent Michael Bernard Silenzio, Peiyuan Qiu, Wenjie Gong. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 30.04.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  depression; machine learning; postpartum; prediction model; random forest; support vector machine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32352387     DOI: 10.2196/15516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Med Inform


  11 in total

1.  Applying machine learning methods to psychosocial screening data to improve identification of prenatal depression: Implications for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Petar M Djurić; Marzieh Ajirak; Tong Chen; Vibha Mane; David J Garry; Cassandra Heiselman; Joseph Chappelle; Marci Lobel
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.405

2.  Predicting perinatal health outcomes using smartphone-based digital phenotyping and machine learning in a prospective Swedish cohort (Mom2B): study protocol.

Authors:  Alkistis Skalkidou; Fotios C Papadopoulos; Ayesha M Bilal; Emma Fransson; Emma Bränn; Allison Eriksson; Mengyu Zhong; Karin Gidén; Ulf Elofsson; Cathrine Axfors
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm for predicting the risk of postpartum depression among pregnant women.

Authors:  Yiye Zhang; Shuojia Wang; Alison Hermann; Rochelle Joly; Jyotishman Pathak
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 4.  Data-Driven Modeling of Pregnancy-Related Complications.

Authors:  Camilo Espinosa; Martin Becker; Ivana Marić; Ronald J Wong; Gary M Shaw; Brice Gaudilliere; Nima Aghaeepour; David K Stevenson
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 15.272

5.  Predicting women with depressive symptoms postpartum with machine learning methods.

Authors:  Sam Andersson; Deepti R Bathula; Stavros I Iliadis; Martin Walter; Alkistis Skalkidou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Postpartum Depression: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kiran Saqib; Amber Fozia Khan; Zahid Ahmad Butt
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2021-11-24

7.  Estimation of postpartum depression risk from electronic health records using machine learning.

Authors:  Guy Amit; Irena Girshovitz; Karni Marcus; Yiye Zhang; Jyotishman Pathak; Vered Bar; Pinchas Akiva
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Heart Rate Information-Based Machine Learning Prediction of Emotions Among Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Xue Li; Chiaki Ono; Noriko Warita; Tomoka Shoji; Takashi Nakagawa; Hitomi Usukura; Zhiqian Yu; Yuta Takahashi; Kei Ichiji; Norihiro Sugita; Natsuko Kobayashi; Saya Kikuchi; Yasuto Kunii; Keiko Murakami; Mami Ishikuro; Taku Obara; Tomohiro Nakamura; Fuji Nagami; Takako Takai; Soichi Ogishima; Junichi Sugawara; Tetsuro Hoshiai; Masatoshi Saito; Gen Tamiya; Nobuo Fuse; Shinichi Kuriyama; Masayuki Yamamoto; Nobuo Yaegashi; Noriyasu Homma; Hiroaki Tomita
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 9.  Technology-Based Approaches for Supporting Perinatal Mental Health.

Authors:  Andrew M Novick; Melissa Kwitowski; Jack Dempsey; Danielle L Cooke; Allison G Dempsey
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 8.081

Review 10.  Affective State Recognition in Livestock-Artificial Intelligence Approaches.

Authors:  Suresh Neethirajan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.