Literature DB >> 32352318

Population Trends in Rates of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization for Acute Coronary Syndromes Associated With the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Raffaele Piccolo1, Dario Bruzzese2, Ciro Mauro3, Antonio Aloia4, Cesare Baldi5, Marco Boccalatte6, Giuseppe Bottiglieri7, Carlo Briguori8, Gianluca Caiazzo9, Paolo Calabrò10, Maurizio Cappelli-Bigazzi11, Ciro De Simone12, Emilio Di Lorenzo13, Paolo Golino11, Vittorio Monda14, Rocco Perrotta15, Gaetano Quaranta16, Enrico Russolillo17, Marino Scherillo18, Tullio Tesorio19, Bernardino Tuccillo20, Giuseppe Valva21, Bruno Villari22, Giuseppe Tarantini23, Attilio Varricchio24, Giovanni Esposito1,25.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; acute coronary syndrome; epidemiology; percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32352318      PMCID: PMC7294593          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


× No keyword cloud information.
A reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been observed globally in the aftermath of the pneumonia outbreak caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).[1] Despite the emergence of anecdotal reports, formal evaluation of the variation in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) rates during the COVID-19 outbreak has not yet been reported. Italy is one of the countries most heavily affected by the COVID-19 pandemic with 168 941 confirmed cases and 22 170 deaths as of April 5, 2020. We investigated the association between the outbreak of COVID-19 and PCI rates for ACS in the Campania region, which, with 5.8 million residents, represents ≈10% of the Italian population. Data were obtained from 20 of 21 PCI centers over an 8-week period, including 4 weeks before and 4 weeks after the COVID-19 outbreak corresponding with the first reported case declared by the Civil Protection Department on February 27, 2020. Incidence rates and their ratios were calculated by using Poisson regression analysis, and interactions for sex and age were estimated by adding the interaction term to the regression models.[2] Population denominators, which were used as offset, were obtained from the Italian census. The ratio change in PCI rates for the entire 8-week interval was estimated by adding a linear term to the Poisson regression. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy). From January 30, 2020, to March 26, 2020, a total of 1831 PCIs were performed in the Campania region; of them, 738 (40.31%) were elective PCIs (not included), 604 (32.99%) were PCIs for non–ST-segment–elevation acute ACS, and 489 (26.71%) were PCIs for ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Mean age was 65.7 years (SD, 12), and 804 of 1093 PCIs (73.56%) were performed in men. There were no differences in mean age (65.8±11.8 versus 65.6±12.2 years, P=0.78) and the proportion of men (72% versus 75%, P=0.29) in the 4 weeks before the COVID-19 outbreak in comparison with the subsequent 4 weeks. The incidence rate of PCI for ACS decreased from 178 to 120 cases per 100 000 residents per year during the 4-week period before in comparison with after the COVID-19 outbreak (Figure). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.68. The reduction was similar for both non–ST-segment–elevation ACS and STEMI (from 98 to 66 and from 80 to 54 PCI cases per 100 000 residents per year, respectively). The decrease in PCIs for ACS was more evident in women (IRR, 0.60) than in men (IRR, 0.70), resulting in a significant interaction (P<0.001). There was heterogeneity (P-interaction <0.001) in the decline of PCI rates across age categories, with patients <55 years of age less affected by the reduction (IRR, 0.75). Findings were consistent between PCI centers in the metropolitan (IRR, 0.72) versus nonmetropolitan areas (IRR, 0.62). Over the interval from week –4 to week +4, the ratio change in PCI rate was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.50–0.52) for ACS, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.53–0.56) for non–ST-segment–elevation acute ACS, and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.45–0.49) for STEMI (Figure). In comparison with the same period in 2019, PCI rates decreased from 190 to 120, from 107 to 66, and from 84 to 54 cases per 100 000 residents per year for ACS (IRR, 0.63), non–ST-segment–elevation acute ACS (IRR, 0.62), and STEMI (IRR, 0.64), respectively. PCI incidence rates during before and after the COVID-19 outbreak in the Campania region, Italy. A, Incidence rates before and after the first reported case of COVID-19 according to the type of ACS. Absolute numbers of PCI cases for ACS, NSTE-ACS, and STEMI were 652, 360, 292 and 441, 244, 197 in the 4 weeks before and the 4 weeks after the outbreak of COVID-19, respectively. In 2019, PCI volumes for the corresponding 4-week period after the outbreak of COVID-19 were 699, 392, 307 for ACS, NSTE-ACS, and STEMI, respectively. B, Incident rates by week according to the type of ACS. Weeks –4 to –1 represent the 4-week period before the first case of COVID-19 in the Campania region (February 27, 2020) and weeks 1 to 4 represent the 4-week period after the COVID-19 outbreak (data were collected until March 26, 2020). C, Incidence rates of PCI for ACS before and after the COVID-19 outbreak according to sex. D, Incidence rates of PCI for ACS before and after the COVID-19 outbreak according to age categories. ACS indicates acute coronary syndrome; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; IRR, incidence rate ratio; NSTE-ACS, non–ST-segment–elevation ACS; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; and STEMI, ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. In the third most populous region of Italy, we found evidence that the outbreak of COVID-19 was associated with a decline by 32% in the number of PCIs for ACS. In the last 2 weeks of the observational period, PCIs for ACS were reduced by 50%. In comparison with PCI volumes for the same time in 2019, the decline in PCI rates was of a similar magnitude (between 36% and 38%). Mechanisms underpinning this decrease are unknown, although several explanations might be involved. Chest pain might be underestimated or misestimated by patients because of the fear of exposure to COVID-19–affected subjects at hospital admission. This hypothesis might be supported by the stronger decline in PCI rates among women, in whom misdiagnosis and delayed revascularization are more likely to occur in an ACS setting.[3] Other explanations might be related to the unique situation of a country lockdown, potentially leading to less physical activity that might trigger an ACS, coupled with reduced air pollution. Our data indicate that the COVID-19 outbreak was associated with a remarkable decrease in the rates of PCI across the entire spectrum of ACS. Although we did not measure the hospitalization rates for ACS, PCI represents the most common revascularization modality for patients who have ACS. The Campania region has been less affected than others by the COVID-19 pandemic and, as a result, no changes occurred during the study period in the regional hub-and-spoke care system and in the management of patients with ACS. Therefore, PCI rates effectively reflect ACS rates. However, we cannot determine to what extent the observed trends reflect changes in patient or physician behavior versus incident ACS. The findings of this study might have important implications for healthcare systems and suggest that public campaigns aiming to increase awareness of ischemic symptoms should be reinforced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lack of appropriate and timely revascularization for patients with ACS might have other important clinical consequences, not yet measured, including increased risk for heart failure or sudden cardiac death.

Disclosures

None.
  1 in total

Review 1.  Acute Myocardial Infarction in Women: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Laxmi S Mehta; Theresa M Beckie; Holli A DeVon; Cindy L Grines; Harlan M Krumholz; Michelle N Johnson; Kathryn J Lindley; Viola Vaccarino; Tracy Y Wang; Karol E Watson; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

  1 in total
  42 in total

1.  Rates of Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Matthew T Mefford; Jaejin An; Nigel Gupta; Teresa N Harrison; Steven J Jacobsen; Ming-Sum Lee; Paul Muntner; Chileshe Nkonde-Price; Lei Qian; Kristi Reynolds
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-12-13

2.  Medical Emergencies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Anna Slagman; Wilhelm Behringer; Felix Greiner; Matthias Klein; Dirk Weismann; Bernadett Erdmann; Mareen Pigorsch; Martin Möckel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  International Prospective Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Thomas A Kite; Peter F Ludman; Chris P Gale; Jianhua Wu; Adriano Caixeta; Jacques Mansourati; Manel Sabate; Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo; Luciano Candilio; Parham Sadeghipour; Angel M Iniesta; Stephen P Hoole; Nick Palmer; Albert Ariza-Solé; Alim Namitokov; Hector H Escutia-Cuevas; Flavien Vincent; Otilia Tica; Mzee Ngunga; Imad Meray; Andrew Morrow; Md Minhaj Arefin; Steven Lindsay; Ghada Kazamel; Vinoda Sharma; Aly Saad; Gianfranco Sinagra; Federico Ariel Sanchez; Marek Roik; Stefano Savonitto; Marija Vavlukis; Shankar Sangaraju; Iqbal S Malik; Sharon Kean; Nick Curzen; Colin Berry; Gregg W Stone; Bernard J Gersh; Anthony H Gershlick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Global effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the rate of acute coronary syndrome admissions: a comprehensive review of published literature.

Authors:  Ayman Helal; Lamis Shahin; Mahmoud Abdelsalam; Mokhtar Ibrahim
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-06

Review 5.  Cardiovascular Involvement in COVID-19: What Sequelae Should We Expect?

Authors:  Maria Vincenza Polito; Angelo Silverio; Michele Bellino; Giuseppe Iuliano; Marco Di Maio; Carmine Alfano; Patrizia Iannece; Nicolino Esposito; Gennaro Galasso
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2021-06-30

6.  [Decrease in the number of primary angioplasty procedures during the pandemic and its relationship with mortality from COVID-19. The role of competing risks].

Authors:  Guillermo Aldama; Fernando Rebollal; Xacobe Flores; Pablo Piñón; Oriol Rodríguez-Leor; José Manuel Vázquez
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.753

7.  The Impact of Covid-19 Lockdown on Stroke Admissions and Treatments in Campania.

Authors:  Paolo Candelaresi; Valentino Manzo; Giovanna Servillo; Mario Muto; Paolo Barone; Rosa Napoletano; Renato Saponiero; Vincenzo Andreone; Vincenzo Palma; Daniele Spitaleri; Florindo D'Onofrio; Giorgia Maniscalco; Simona Salvatore; Giuseppe Leone; Elisa Capone; Carla Schettino; Daniele Romano; Gioacchino Martusciello; Stefania Miniello; Maria Pia Mazzaferro; Salvatore Ascione
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Increased cardiovascular death rates in a COVID-19 low prevalence area.

Authors:  Rita Del Pinto; Claudio Ferri; Leondino Mammarella; Stefano Abballe; Sofia Dell'Anna; Sabrina Cicogna; Davide Grassi; Simona Sacco; Giovambattista Desideri
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Cardiovascular Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global Perspective.

Authors:  Marouane Boukhris; Ali Hillani; Francesco Moroni; Mohamed Salah Annabi; Faouzi Addad; Marcelo Harada Ribeiro; Samer Mansour; Xiaohui Zhao; Luiz Fernando Ybarra; Antonio Abbate; Luz Maria Vilca; Lorenzo Azzalini
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 6.614

10.  Heart failure management during the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy: a telemedicine experience from a heart failure university tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Andrea Salzano; Roberta D'Assante; Francesca M Stagnaro; Valeria Valente; Giulia Crisci; Federica Giardino; Michele Arcopinto; Eduardo Bossone; Alberto M Marra; Antonio Cittadini
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 17.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.