| Literature DB >> 32352043 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past several decades, rural and indigenous populations in Latin America have experienced abrupt and profound transformations in their lifestyles and economies, many having remarkable health consequences. Yet, these changes have had heterogeneous effects on the population's biology in different local contexts.Entities:
Keywords: Atacama Desert; Atacameño; Mapuche; Pehuenche; dietary change; food delocalization; indigenous health; nutrition transition; traditional food
Year: 2020 PMID: 32352043 PMCID: PMC7180001 DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Dev Nutr ISSN: 2475-2991
FIGURE 1Location of the communities of the study sites. (Figure was produced using the software QGIS, version 3.4.15-Madeira).
Risk classification according to age and sex for each biomarker
| Biomarkers | At-risk |
|---|---|
| BFP female | 18 y: ≥31%; 19 y: ≥32%; 20–39 y: ≥33%; 40–59 y: ≥34%; ≥60 y: ≥36% |
| BFP male | 18–39 y: ≥20%; 40–59 y: ≥22%; ≥60 y: ≥25% |
| WC female | ≥88 cm |
| WC male | ≥102 cm |
| BMI | ≥25 kg/m2 |
| CHOL | 18–19 y: ≥170 mg/dL; ≥20 y: ≥200 mg/dL |
| HDL CHOL | 18–19 y: ≤44 mg/dL; ≥20 y: ≤49 mg/dL |
| TRG | ≥150 mg/dL |
| SBP | Average of 3 reads: ≥130 mmHg |
| DBP | Average of 3 reads: ≥80 mmHg |
| GLU | >45 min after meal or beverage: ≥240 mg/dL |
1BFP, body fat percentage; CHOL, cholesterol; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GLU, glucose; HDL CHOL, HDL cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TRG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
Descriptive statistics of sample characteristics and confounders by ethnic group
| Characteristic | Total ( | Pehuenche ( | Atacameño ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex female | 134 (71%) | 64 (71%) | 70 (70%) | 0.993 |
| Age, y | 51.52 ± 17.1 | 48.5 ± 15.5 | 54.2 ± 18.1 | 0.020* |
| Smoking (at least 1 cigarette on 1 or more occasions per week) | 17 (8.9%) | 3 (3.3%) | 14 (14%) | — |
| MVPA, min/wk | 387.1 ± 631.6 | 488.5 ± 670.5 | 295.8 ± 582.7 | 0.037* |
| Any physical activity, min/wk | 616.9 ± 776.3 | 685.2 ± 750.0 | 555.5 ± 798.0 | 0.250 |
| Physical inactivity, min/wk | 358.7 ± 174.9 | 250.6 ± 119.8 | 456.0 ± 159.2 | <0.001* |
| % kcal carbohydrates | 55.2 ± 6.3 | 54.6 ± 5.9 | 55.7 ± 6.7 | 0.225 |
| % kcal protein | 12.9 ± 1.9 | 12.6 ± 2.0 | 13.1 ± 1.8 | 0.075 |
| % kcal lipids | 31.9 ± 5.8 | 31.5 ± 5.7 | 32.3 ± 5.8 | 0.375 |
| % kcal ultraprocessed foods | 13.7 ± 6.6 | 15.1 ± 6.9 | 12.4 ± 6.1 | 0.005* |
| % kcal refined carbohydrates | 26.0 ± 9.4 | 25.2 ± 9.7 | 26.8 ± 9.1 | 0.264 |
| % kcal traditional foods | 1.7 ± 2.7 | 1.3 ± 2.5 | 2.2 ± 2.7 | 0.012* |
| Food insecurity in childhood | 120 (63%) | 70 (78%) | 50 (50%) | <0.001* |
| Food insecurity mother | 147 (82%) | 81 (92%) | 66 (72%) | <0.001* |
| Food insecurity father | 130 (82%) | 77 (91%) | 53 (73%) | 0.006* |
| Body fat, % | 34.5 ± 8.2 | 35.7 ± 7.6 | 35.1 ± 7.9 | 0.291 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29.0 ± 4.5 | 29.4 ± 4.4 | 28.7 ± 4.5 | 0.243 |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 75.6 ± 9.2 | 76.5 ± 9.4 | 74.8 ± 9.0 | 0.217 |
| Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 118.8 ± 17.1 | 118.9 ± 16.8 | 118.6 ± 17.4 | 0.910 |
| Blood cholesterol, mg/dL | 163.0 ± 36.8 | 158.7 ± 37.7 | 166.8 ± 35.7 | 0.133 |
| Blood HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 44.1 ± 13.2 | 43.9 ± 11.1 | 44.3 ± 14.9 | 0.834 |
| Blood triglycerides, mg/dL | 222.1 ± 111.9 | 216.0 ± 116.6 | 227.7 ± 107.7 | 0.475 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 100.7 ± 11.5 | 102.0 ± 11.3 | 99.5 ± 11.6 | 0.156 |
| Blood glucose, mg/dL | 138.5 ± 59.3 | 134.9 ± 45.5 | 141.8 ± 69.6 | 0.412 |
| Diagnosed type 2 diabetes | 17 (8.9%) | 9 (10%) | 8 (8%) | 0.820 |
| Time since last meal, min | 174.2 ± 129.2 | 192.1 ± 159.5 | 158.8 ± 94.3 | 0.096 |
1Mean ± SD for continuous variables and frequency (%) for categorical variables. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05. MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
2Less than 5 observations per cell.
3Sample of 8 refined carbohydrate foods.
4Nonfasting blood glucose.
FIGURE 2Percentage of population “at-risk” for each biomarker by population. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups at P < 0.05 for any biomarker. BFP, body fat percentage; CHOL, cholesterol; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GLU, glucose; HDL, HDL cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TRG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
Logistic regression for each biomarker risk outcome using multiple predictors
| Predictors | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomarkers | Age, y | Sex: male | Ethnicity: Pehuenche | Food insecurity | UP foods | MVPA | Time meal |
| BFP “at-risk” | 0.99 (0.96, 1.02) | 0.69 (0.26, 1.90) | 0.82 (0.29, 2.27) | 1.99 (0.70, 5.74) | 0.96 (0.88, 1.03) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | — |
| BMI “at-risk” | 0.99 (0.96, 1.01) | 0.42 (0.19, 0.93)* | 1.02 (0.44, 2.37) | 1.51 (0.64, 3.60) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) | 1.00 (1.00, −1.00) | — |
| WC “at-risk” | 0.98 (0.95, 1.00) | 0.089 (0.04, 0.19)* | 1.01 (0.44, 2.34) | 0.96 (0.39, 2.34) | 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | — |
| SBP “at-risk” | 1.05 (1.02 −1.08)* | 2.36 (1.09, 5.13)* | 1.28 (0.57, 2.94) | 0.74 (0.31, 1.73) | 1.12 (1.05 −1.20)* | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | — |
| DBP “at-risk” | 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) | 3.2 (1.58, 6.64)* | 1.29 (0.59, 2.46) | 1.23 (0.58, 2.46) | 1.02 (0.97, 1.08) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | — |
| CHOL “at-risk” | 1.03 (1.01, 1.06)* | 0.64 (0.23, 1.61) | 1.01 (0.43– 2.41) | 1.11 (0.45, 2.86) | 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) |
| TRG “at-risk” | 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) | 0.97 (0.47, 2.07) | 0.79 (0.39, 1.58) | 0.87 (0.41, 1.84) | 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)* | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) |
| HDL CHOL “at-risk” | 0.96 (0.94, 0.99)* | 0.38 (0.18, 0.79)* | 0.68 (0.33, 1.39) | 1.43 (0.66, 3.12) | 1.00 (0.95, 1.06) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) |
| GLU “at-risk” | 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) | 0.79 (0.27, 2.09) | 1.38 (0.56, 3.49) | 2.81 (0.98, 9.36) | 0.95 (0.88, 1.02) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 1.01 (1.00, 1.01)* |
| Quintile risk score | 1.01 (0.99, 1.02) | 1.55 (0.83, 2.89) | 0.88 (0.48, 1.61) | 1.41 (0.75, 2.67) | 1.02 (0.97, 1.07) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)* | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) |
1Results displayed as ORs (95% CIs). Risk categories were defined according to the cutoffs indicated in Table 1. *Statistically significant at P < 0.05. BFP, body fat percentage; CHOL, cholesterol; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; GLU, glucose; HDL CHOL, HDL cholesterol; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous activity; SBP, systolic blood pressure; Time meal, minutes since last meal; TRG, triglycerides; UP, ultraprocessed; WC, waist circumference.
2Nonfasting glucose “at-risk” category was adjusted by time of last meal according to the cutoffs indicated in Table 1.
3Ordinal logistic regression.
Multivariate linear regression for log-transformed Framingham risk scores
| Predictor | Coefficient (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.05 (0.05, 0.06) | <0.001* |
| Sex: male | 1.14 (0.94, 1.35) | <0.001* |
| Ethnicity: Pehuenche | −0.06 (−0.25, 0.14) | 0.5735 |
| Food insecurity | 0.10 (−0.11, 0.30) | 0.3595 |
| UP foods | 0.01 (−0.01, 0.02) | 0.3399 |
| MVPA | −0.00 (−0.00, 0.00) | 0.0722 |
1Results displayed as ORs (95% CIs). *Statistically significant at P < 0.05. MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; UP, ultraprocessed.