| Literature DB >> 32351939 |
Marzia Fantauzzi1,2, Bernhard Elsener1,2,3, Federica Cocco1,2, Cristiana Passiu4, Antonella Rossi1,2.
Abstract
The present work focuses on the characterization of brass surfaces after contact with artificial saliva solution at pH 7.4 and phosphate buffer solution at pH 7 simulating two extreme conditions that might occur when playing ancient brass wind instruments in the context of historically informed performance practice. The composition and the morphology of the film formed following the contact with the solutions for 1, 3, and 16 h were investigated by ex situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to shed a light on the surface changes upon time. In situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to study the mechanism of corrosion and protection of the alloys. The results could be interpreted using a reliable equivalent electrical circuit; they provided evidence that the alloys behave differently when in contact to the various solutions. In saliva solution the formation on the brass surface of a thick surface film was observed, composed of crystallites of about 200 nm size mainly composed of CuSCN and Zn3(PO4)2. This layer hinders the alloy dissolution. The contact of the alloys with the buffer solution originated a much thinner layer composed of Cu2O, ZnO, and a small amount of Zn3(PO4)2. This film is rapidly formed and does not evolve upon time in a protective film.Entities:
Keywords: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM); brass alloys; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); nanostructured surface film; neutral solutions
Year: 2020 PMID: 32351939 PMCID: PMC7174669 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1SEM images acquired on the Cu37Zn and Cu38Zn2Pb alloys following the mechanical polishing procedure, after 16 h of exposure to the phosphate buffer and to the artificial saliva solutions.
Calculated fitting parameters for brass alloys after 1, 3, and 16 h of immersion in phosphate buffer solution; the standard deviation in percentage of the value is obtained from three replica measurements and is reported in parentheses.
| Cu18Zn | 1 | −59 | 614 (8) | 18 (30) | 0.87 (7) | 2 (16) | 88 (5) | 0.7 (3) | 37 (9) |
| 3 | −44 | 653 (8) | 10 (20) | 0.93 (7) | 5 (23) | 59 (6) | 0.7 (12) | 87 (20) | |
| 16 | −48 | 569 (1) | 8 (15) | 0.94 (3) | 4 (21) | 36 (3) | 0.7 (2) | 95 (5) | |
| Cu28Zn | 1 | −69 | 603 (6) | 22 (16) | 0.83 (2) | 4 (21) | 71 (19) | 0.7 (2) | 31 (20) |
| 3 | −49 | 683 (3) | 10 (17) | 0.92 (3) | 5 (20) | 47 (12) | 0.7 (1) | 12 (14) | |
| 16 | −63 | 514 (1) | 11 (15) | 0.89 (2) | 2 (25) | 54 (2) | 0.6 (2) | 70 (5) | |
| Cu37Zn | 1 | −83 | 652 (6) | 21 (33) | 0.88 (5) | 2 (27) | 90 (14) | 0.6 (3) | 32 (12) |
| 3 | −82 | 565 (10) | 18 (18) | 0.86 (7) | 3 (30) | 69 (16) | 0.6 (5) | 40 (27) | |
| 16 | −76 | 608 (1) | 12 (20) | 0.96 (3) | 1 (14) | 86 (2) | 0.7 (2) | 17 (3) | |
| Cu35Zn1Pb | 1 | −79 | 618 (1) | 31 (25) | 0.84 (7) | 3 (30) | 91 (17) | 0.6 (12) | 26 (25) |
| 3 | −66 | 661 (4) | 18 (30) | 0.83 (11) | 3 (22) | 53 (3) | 0.7 (5) | 56 (30) | |
| 16 | −61 | 651 (5) | 14 (20) | 0.91 (11) | 3 (18) | 53 (6) | 0.7 (5) | 78 (20) | |
| Cu38Zn2Pb | 1 | −86 | 623 (10) | 53 (6) | 0.80 (3) | 6 (16) | 90 (6) | 0.6 (12) | 23 (20) |
| 3 | −68 | 656 (6) | 17 (25) | 0.91 (8) | 4 (23) | 58 (13) | 0.6 (5) | 49 (32) | |
| 16 | −75 | 629 (1) | 11 (9) | 0.91 (1) | 3 (15) | 47 (1) | 0.6 (2) | 91 (4) |
Calculated fitting parameters for brass alloys after 1, 3, and 16 h of immersion in artificial saliva solution.
| Cu18Zn | 1 3 | −348 (1) −330 (2) | 170 (11) 139 (14) | – 24 (12) | – 0.51 (1) | – 22 (37) | 109 (2) 22 (9) | 0.81 (1) 0.82 (2) | 2 (1) 3 (7) |
| 16 | −159 (20) | 139 (16) | 93 (26) | 0.67 (20) | 17 (20) | 23 (4) | 0.83 (6) | 7 (30) | |
| Cu28Zn | 1 3 | −347 (1) −314 (3) | 164 (7) 160 (1) | – 23 (11) | – 0.51 (3) | – 36 (20) | 103 (1) 24 (20) | 0.82 (1) 0.83 (2) | 2 (2) 3 (13) |
| 16 | −230 (3) | 160 (2) | 11 (38) | 0.55 (5) | 371 (5) | 2 (40) | 0.86 (7) | 1 (37) | |
| Cu37Zn | 1 3 | −338 (3) −279 (4) | 150 (1) 176 (8) | – 15 (17) | – 0.51 (3) | – 72 (12) | 122 (14) 25 (24) | 0.77 (1) 0.80 (2) | 5 (4) 3 (22) |
| 16 | −320 (7) | 159 (2) | 21 (5) | 0.43 (5) | 77 (13) | 5 (5) | 0.80 (1) | 2 (6) | |
| Cu35Zn1Pb | 1 3 | −344 (1) −277 (12) | 158 (4) 164 (4) | – 2 (12) | – 0.52 (3) | – 77 (30) | 81 (19) 34 (15) | 0.81 (2) 0.77 (3) | 4 (16) 3 (19) |
| 16 | −187 (19) | 198 (2) | 12 (30) | 0.50 (3) | 427 (18) | 2 (33) | 0.85 (5) | 2 (24) | |
| Cu38Zn2Pb | 1 3 | −341 (1) −304 (2) | 154 (6) 208 (36) | – 10 (32) | – 0.51 (3) | – 44 (18) | 115 (2) 34 (22) | 0.78 (1) 0.77 (2) | 4 (2) 4 (23) |
| 16 | −167 (3) | 128 (1) | 8 (1) | 0.49 (1) | 743 (1) | 1 (4) | 0.86 (3) | 1 (10) |
The standard deviation in percentage of the value is obtained from three replica measurements and is reported in parentheses.
Figure 2Bode plots of all the brass alloys in contact with the phosphate buffer pH 7 for 1 h (A) and for 16 h (B).
Figure 3Bode plots of all the brass alloys in contact with the artificial saliva solution for 1 h (A) and for 16 h (B).
Figure 4Equivalent circuit used to analyse the impedance spectra of brass alloys in phosphate buffer solution and in artificial saliva solution.
Figure 5High-resolution spectra of Cu 2p3/2, Zn 2p3/2, and P 2p for the alloy Cu37Zn after 1, and 16 h of contact with the phosphate buffer solution.
Average binding energy (BE) of the most intense photoelectron peaks, kinetic energy of Auger peaks and quantitative composition (at %) of the main elements detected on Cu37Zn after exposure to the phosphate buffer solution.
| Cu 2p3/2 Cu (0) | 932.5 (0.1) | 5 (2) | 932.6 (0.1) | 1.7 (0.8) | 932.6 (0.1) | 0.9 (0.4) |
| Cu 2p3/2 Cu (I) | 932.5 (0.1) | 7 (2) | 932.6 (0.1) | 12 (3) | 932.6 (0.1) | 12 (1) |
| Cu 2p3/2 Cu (II) | 934.9 (0.1) | 5 (2) | 934.9 (0.1) | 5 (2) | 934.9 (0.1) | 6 (2) |
| Sat 1 | 944.1 (0.1) | 944.0 (0.1) | 944.0 (0.1) | |||
| Sat 2 | 941.8 (0.3) | 941.5 (0.1) | 941.5 (0.1) | |||
| O 1s | 530.7 (0.1) | 59 (7) | 530.6 (0.1) | 64 (6) | 530.7 (0.1) | 64 (7) |
| 531.7 (0.1) | 531.6 (0.1) | 531.7 (0.1) | ||||
| 533.2 (0.2) | 532.5 (0.2) | 533.1 (0.2) | ||||
| P 2p 3/2 | 133.0 (0.2) | 12 (3) | 132.8 (0.2) | 10 (2) | 133.0 (0.1) | 9 (3) |
| Zn 2p3/2 Zn (0) | 1022.1 (0.1) | 3 (1) | 1022.1 (0.1) | 1.7 (0.2) | 1022.2 (0.1) | 1.4 (0.3) |
| Zn 2p3/2 Zn (II) | 1022.1 (0.1) | 9 (2) | 1022.1 (0.1) | 5 (1) | 1022.2 (0.1) | 3.2 (0.6) |
| Cu L3M4, 5M4, 5 met | 918.8 (0.2) | 918.8 (0.1) | 918.9 (0.2) | |||
| Cu L3M4, 5M4, 5 Ox | 916.8 (0.1) | 916.9 (0.1) | 916.9 (0.2) | |||
| Zn L3M4, 5M4, 5 met | 992.3 (0.1) | 992.4 (0.1) | 992.3 (0.1) | |||
| Zn L3M4, 5M4, 5 Ox | 987.4 (0.2) | 987.7 (0.2) | 987.5 (0.1) | |||
| lc | 1.7 (0.3) nm | 1.9 (0.2) nm | 2.1 (0.1) nm | |||
| t | 0.9 (0.1) nm | 1.05 (0.03) nm | 0.7 (0.1) nm | |||
| Surface layer | Cu ox = 64 (22)% Zn ox = 36 (22)% | Cu ox = 75 (10)% Zn ox = 25 (10)% | Cu ox = 82 (2)% Zn ox 18 (2)% | |||
| Surface/bulk interface | Cu met = 47 (4)% Zn met = 53 (4)% | Cu met = 47 (9)% Zn met = 53 (9)% | Cu met = 30 (7)% Zn met = 70 (7)% | |||
The thicknesses of the contamination layer (lc) and of the surface layer (t), together with the composition of the surface layer and of the bulk/surface layer interface, estimated by the three-layer model (Rossi and Elsener, .
Figure 6High resolution spectra of Cu 2p3/2, Zn 2p3/2, P 2p, S 2p, and N 1s of the Cu37Zn sample after 1, 3, and 16 h of contact with the saliva solution.
Average binding energy (BE) of the most intense photoelectron peaks, kinetic energy of the Auger peaks and quantitative composition (at %) of the main elements detected on Cu37Zn after contact with the saliva solution.
| Cu 2p | 932.6 (0.1) | 13 (1) | 932.5 (0.1) | 13 (4) | 932.5 (0.1) | 6 (1) |
| N 1s | 398.6 (0.1) | 10 (2) | 398.5 (0.1) | 25 (16) | 398.5 (0.1) | 5 (1) |
| N 1s | 399.9 (0.2) | 400.0 (0.1) | 400.1 (0.1) | |||
| O 1s | 531.1 (0.2) | 40 (4) | 532.1 (0.2) | 29 (3) | 532.4 (0.1) | 50 (1) |
| O 1s | 532.3 (0.2) | 532.5 (0.2) | 533.6 (0.1) | |||
| O 1s | 533.3 (0.2) | 533.0 (0.1) | 531.7 (0.1) | |||
| P 2p 3/2 | 134.2 (0.2) | 7(1) | 134.3 (0.2) | 6 (1) | 133.8 (0.1) | 13 (2) |
| S 2p SCN | 163.3 (0.2) | 11 (1) | 163.3 (0.1) | 15 (7) | 163.2 (0.1) | 6 (1) |
| Zn 2p | 1022.9 (0.2) | 18 (1) | 1022.8 (0.1) | 12 (1) | 1022.7 (0.1) | 20 (3) |
| Cu L3M4, 5M4, 5 | 915.7 (0.1) | 915.5 (0.1) | 915.5 (0.1) | |||
| Zn L3M4, 5M4, 5 | 986.3 (0.1) | 986.2 (0.2) | 986.3 (0.1) | |||
Standard deviations are given in parentheses.
Figure 7Scatter plot of the film resistance Rfilm and the charge transfer resistance Rct vs. OCP for all alloys and immersion times in (A) artificial saliva and in (B) phosphate buffer solution.
Figure 8P2p3/2 binding energy of surface films formed on brass alloys in artificial saliva and in phosphate buffer solution together with phosphate compounds.